加载中...
共找到 40,156 条相关资讯
Stella David: Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Entain's 2025 Results Presentation. I'm delighted to be here to present a strong set of results. I'm joined this morning on stage by Rob Wood, our CFO and Deputy CFO. And I also have members -- by the way, can you hear me? Good, good. Okay. Always helps in a presentation to be heard, I think. Anyway, I'm also joined by the IR team here in the audience. We also have senior members of the executive team in the audience as well. And we have our new CFO designate, Michael Snape, who's in the front row as well. So welcome to everybody. And now on to the agenda. I'm going to start with the headlines and some of the highlights of our strong progress. After that, Rob will then take you through the financials and provide you with the guidelines for 2026. And then it's going to be back to me to discuss our strategic delivery, how our priorities are evolving to further accelerate our performance and why we have confidence in our pathway to earnings growth, margin expansion and cash generation, including our conviction that we are going to hit at least GBP 500 million of annual adjusted cash flow from 2028. And then finally, I will briefly wrap up before we open everything to your questions. But before I actually do move on to 2025 financial performance, this is the first time that I have spoken publicly since the U.K. budget back in November. The U.K. government's decision to dramatically increase taxes on the gambling sector was extremely disappointing. It opens the door to the illegal black market who pay no tax, do not have a license and offer no player protections. However, during this period of turmoil, we will invest wisely in the U.K., and we will seize the opportunity to gain share from the long tail of subscale operators who, quite frankly, are ill-equipped to withstand this impact. Okay. Now turning to our results. 2025 has been a good year for the group. We delivered against our strategic priorities and achieved a strong financial performance with EBITDA for both Entain and BetMGM ahead of expectations. Importantly, growth was broad-based and underpinned by strong volume growth, which demonstrates the underlying health of the business. Online volumes were up 7% year-on-year in 2025. And impressively, it was up 9% in Q4. Throughout 2025, online business consistently delivered growth, and we now have 7 consecutive quarters of revenue growth online, and that is despite starting to lap some tough comps. The U.K. continues to be a standout performance, but also there are markets like Spain, Canada, Greece, Georgia, New Zealand, all showing strong double-digit growth. And our joint venture, BetMGM, produced an excellent year of strong and profitable growth. We also enjoyed efficiency improvements. Entain's EBITDA was up 8% year-on-year to GBP 1.16 billion. And including our share of BetMGM, EBITDA was up an impressive 28% to GBP 1.244 billion. The EBITDA outperformance is stronger than expected and -- the EBITDA performance and the stronger-than-expected cash return from BetMGM has driven a meaningful improvement in our adjusted cash flow, again, ahead of expectations. So our improvement journey is working and it is delivering. Our diversified portfolio of podium positions provides resilience and scale advantages that matter more than ever now. Building on this momentum, we have evolved our strategic priorities to further optimize how we work, enhance profitability, drive meaningful cash generation. So in summary, 2025 has been a strong year. The business is in good shape, and we're confident in our ability to not only navigate the challenges, but to emerge stronger. And with that, I'll temporarily hand over to Rob. Rob Wood: Thanks, Stella. Good morning, everyone. So for the eighth and final time, I'm delighted to be delivering the full year results presentation, and it's a pleasure to present strong numbers again before I hand over the baton to Mike. It's a familiar format for me this morning, so let me jump straight in. And as usual, all revenue and EBITDA growth numbers that I quote are in constant currency unless stated otherwise. So starting with revenue, and I'm really pleased with the growth we delivered across the whole group. Total revenue, including 50% of BetMGM, was up by nearly GBP 0.5 billion to GBP 6.4 billion or up 8% year-on-year. Within that, online NGR ex U.S. was up -- was GBP 3.9 billion, up 6% year-on-year. And barring adverse sports results in Q4, that growth number would have been 7%, in line with volume growth for the year. On to EBITDA, which came in ahead of expectations for both BetMGM and Entain. Ex U.S. EBITDA of GBP 1.16 billion beat our guidance and was up 8% year-on-year despite digesting new taxes from Brazil following their new regulatory regime. Online EBITDA margin also beat guidance, and I'm delighted to say it was up 0.4 percentage points year-on-year despite a 1.4 percentage point drag from Brazil taxes. So that means that our scaled growth and improving operational execution drove an underlying 1.8 percentage point margin improvement, which is a key highlight of the year. So with EBITDA beats from both Entain and BetMGM, total group EBITDA was GBP 1.24 billion, which was up a very strong 28% on the prior year. And that EBITDA growth led to equally impressive EPS growth, which more than doubled to 62p. Moving on to adjusted cash flow, which is a key measure for us, and I'm delighted to report a strong year-on-year improvement from an outflow in 2024 to an inflow of GBP 151 million in 2025. GBP 151 million is comfortably ahead of expectations and was driven by both the Entain EBITDA beats and higher-than-expected cash from BetMGM. On to dividends, we've declared a final dividend of 9.8p per share, up 5% year-on-year, which is consistent with the half year and our progressive dividend policy. Finally, leverage. We've added a look-through leverage metric, which better reflects the group's leverage position. What do we mean by look-through? On the debt side of the equation, we include the outstanding DPA payments and the balance sheet value of the CEE minority. And on the EBITDA side, we include our 50% share of BetMGM. And as the slide shows, look-through leverage at year-end was 3.6x, which is down significantly from 4.3x at the end of 2024 due to both EBITDA growth, but also paying down the DPA. On a reported basis, leverage has come in at 3.1x, flat year-on-year as expected, and available cash remains strong at over GBP 900 million. Let's turn now to our online revenue performance ex U.S. over recent quarters. And this chart shows 2 lines: one for NGR growth, which includes volatility from sports margin and one for volume growth, which adjusts NGR to remove any impact from sports margin and is therefore a clear measure of underlying growth. Two particularly satisfying callouts. Firstly, we've now delivered 7 consecutive quarters of growth, all on an organic basis, evidencing the structural growth in our business model. And secondly, we maintained strong volume growth into the second half of the year despite lapping the voluntary code in the U.K. in the summer. No doubt there'll be some recycling benefit to volumes in H2, given margin was below expectation in both Q3 and Q4, but volumes were consistently strong and grew 7% across the year. So that means we're growing at least in line with our markets, and we enter 2026 with continued momentum. Now for the eagle eyed amongst you, you'll note this chart is not quite the same as we've shown previously. The prior version normalized for Euro 2024 and it adjusted the current year margin to a normalized margin, meaning that volatility from the prior year margin still impacts the picture, but that version is included in the appendix. Now to our usual market breakdown. And again, it's a strong picture with growth coming from across the portfolio. Our largest market, UK&I, continues to be a standout performer, delivering growth of 15% in online, well in excess of market growth as we continue to regain market share. We also saw sustained double-digit volume growth in the U.K. throughout every quarter of 2025. And U.K. Retail also saw market share gains as we were flat like-for-like across the year in a market which declined by mid-single digits. International online NGR grew 2%, slightly behind volume growth of 4% due to soft margins, especially in Brazil and also Australia. Importantly, the second half saw an acceleration in volumes from 1% in H1 to 7% in H2, helped by lapping the regulatory changes in 2024 from Belgium and Netherlands. If we look now by market within international, Brazil had a tough sport margin in H2, falling 3 percentage points year-on-year. So consequently, NGR declined in H2 and brought growth for the year down to flat. However, on the plus side, volumes were up 13% over the year. Market share was maintained over H2, so we know other operators were hit by a poor margin, too. And we delivered a positive contribution to EBITDA despite the new regulation and high competition. Australia next, where customer-friendly results at several tentpole events suppressed NGR, particularly in the second half of the year. Volume growth fared better with 3% growth in H2 as our refreshed management team have been a catalyst for improving performance and improving profitability. Italy online was up 5%, growing NGR consistently by mid-single digits in every quarter of the year. And Italy retail also fared well with 7% NGR growth over the year. Other large markets in International continued to see double-digit growth, including New Zealand, Georgia and Spain on this page, but also Canada, Greece and parts of the Baltics and Nordics as well. CEE next and both Croatia and Poland delivered growth in both NGR and EBITDA and retained their market leadership positions in those markets. And finally, BetMGM also reported an outstanding performance with 34% growth in online revenue. The key takeaway from this slide should be the unrivaled broad-based growth that Entain enjoys across the diversified portfolio. Looking forward, we're targeting growth across every one of these online markets in 2026, which positions us very well for '26 and beyond. Moving on now to EBITDA, which came in ahead of expectations for both Entain and BetMGM. This slide shows our year-on-year bridge with EBITDA excluding BetMGM on the left and then EBITDA including BetMGM on the right. Starting on the left, Entain's EBITDA grew 7% or up GBP 71 million on a reported basis, that 7% becomes 8% on a constant currency basis, and it would be 14% excluding the new Brazil taxes. As usual, as the left-hand side chart shows, our online business is the main growth engine, adding GBP 136 million year-on-year. Where did that come from? Three things. Firstly, NGR growth, as we've looked at on the prior slides. Two, efficiency savings, particularly within cost of sales as our online gross profit margin increased a whole percentage point before Brazil tax. And thirdly, improved marketing returns, enabling us to hold spend broadly flat year-on-year in absolute terms, thereby improving margin. Retail now, and we saw EBITDA up GBP 16 million year-on-year, helped by a favorable margin versus our expectations. Then in addition to Entain's GBP 71 million year-on-year increase from the left-hand side, the right-hand chart adds our share of BetMGM's significant EBITDA improvement of GBP 178 million year-on-year as it inflected to profitability, which gives an all-in total group EBITDA of GBP 1.244 billion, up almost GBP 250 million year-on-year. That's an impressive 25% growth on a reported basis and a touch higher at 28% in constant currency, and that's all organic growth. And as I mentioned earlier, that EBITDA growth is the primary driver of why EPS more than doubled last year. Let's now take a closer look at cash flow and leverage. And as always, there's a detailed cash flow provided in the appendix. As a reminder, adjusted cash flow is effectively our distributable cash, i.e., cash flow pre-equity dividends, and we also exclude working capital noise and strip out M&A and debt movements. In 2025, we delivered adjusted cash flow of GBP 151 million, which is meaningfully ahead of expectations. You'll remember a year ago, I had guided adjusted cash flow to be broadly neutral. And then by Q3, we were ahead of plan, particularly thanks to BetMGM. And so guidance effectively moved from neutral to GBP 75 million, and then we beat that too. So what drove the outperformance? Firstly, Entain's EBITDA beat guidance. And secondly, BetMGM returned more cash to parents than guided, $270 million in total for 2025, which far exceeded expectation. And finally, a net favorable movement across other cash items, including lower interest costs following our debt refinancing efforts last year. Net debt ended the year at GBP 3.6 billion, with the improvement in adjusted cash flow offset by an FX translation bad guy of over GBP 100 million and the working capital outflow that was as expected. So overall, reported leverage of 3.1x is in line with where we expected it to be, but more insightfully, look-through leverage of 3.6x saw a meaningful improvement, down from 4.3x in the prior year, reflecting EBITDA growth, improved cash flow and a reduction in the remaining DPA balance. So our cash flow and look-through leverage improved significantly. Our available cash remains strong at over GBP 900 million, and we have a healthy debt maturity profile with our next significant maturity of around 20% of the debt not falling due until 2028. A few quick comments on BetMGM now. It won't be new news, but it's still important given its significance to the group's priorities, particularly cash generation. BetMGM had a fantastic year and delivered ahead of its upgraded expectations with total revenues up 33% and EBITDA up over $460 million year-on-year as it moved into profitability. This inflection triggered the start of cash returns to parents with $270 million distributed in 2025, including excess cash from the 2024 year-end. The strong performance last year was driven by BetMGM's disciplined execution, underpinned by a leading iGaming offering and BetMGM remains on track to deliver approximately $500 million of adjusted EBITDA in 2027. Since we created BetMGM around 8 years ago, total net investment between parents now sits at almost exactly $1 billion. So with approximately $500 million of EBITDA next year, it's easy to see that the ROI on that investment has been excellent. Now last slide from me, the outlook for 2026. And remember, the appendix includes a detailed guidance slide for modeling purposes as well as a slide on the BetMGM parent fee mechanics. To be consistent with prior years, when I refer to Entain EBITDA, this is before parent fee income, which does start in 2026. So for 2026, we expect online NGR growth of 5% to 7% on a constant currency basis with broad-based growth across the portfolio. Online EBITDA margin is expected to drop to 23% to 24% in 2026 following the increase in U.K. gaming taxes, including our expectation of mitigating approximately 25% of that cost in 2026. Stella will talk about it more shortly, but our upgraded mitigation expectation today is to improve cost mitigation to over 50% of the U.K. tax impact from 2027 onwards. The efficiency plans, which Stella will take you through, will support an upward trajectory for both EBITDA and EBITDA margin from 2027. So with 5% to 7% online NGR growth and 23% to 24% online EBITDA margin, we're comfortable with current market expectations for 2026 Entain EBITDA, which represents a small decline year-on-year. However, when combined with growth in the U.S., EBITDA, including the U.S., will be broadly stable year-on-year. And broadly stable, of course, represents significant underlying growth before absorbing the U.K. gambling tax rises. Another consequence of the U.K. tax rise is that we lose a year on a deleveraging profile because now look-through leverage will be broadly stable in 2026 before resuming deleveraging thereafter. Two more bits of guidance to touch on. Firstly, marketing phasing because 2026 is a World Cup year, we expect approximately 55% of marketing spend to be in the first half, consistent with previous tournament years. And then secondly, now that BetMGM is sustainably profitable, our ETR guidance going forward is on an including U.S. basis. And the new ETR, so effective tax rate, the new number is 30%. This is higher than 2025 due to the U.K. tax increase as we'll now have less profits in the U.K., which are taxed at a below average ETR. And so that adverse change in geographical mix pushes up the group's blended ETR. In addition, there's a slide in the appendix, which takes you through expected tax accounting treatment of our share of the $1 billion of available brought forward losses in BetMGM. In short, a deferred tax asset is expected to be recognized in 2026, which will give a boost to EPS in 2026, but then available losses are no longer benefiting EPS in the following 2 to 3 years. Cash tax is not impacted. So in summary from my section, we expect 2026 total group EBITDA, including BetMGM, to be stable year-on-year despite digesting the significant increase in U.K. taxes. How do we achieve that? We operate in growth markets where we have the most diverse set of podium positions globally. So we have structural sustained growth built into our model. We also have a gaming-led business in the U.S. without material exposure to prediction markets. So those combined give us confidence that underlying growth will continue into 2026 and beyond. And on a final note, I'm proud to say that our EBITDA of just under GBP 1.25 billion is now twice the size of the first EBITDA number that I reported 7 years ago and is many multiples bigger than my early days at Gala Coral. It's been quite a journey. It's been hugely eventful. It's been highly rewarding, and I'm delighted to be leaving the business with great momentum across an outstanding global footprint, yet still with so many growth opportunities ahead. And it's also clear that in Mike, we have -- I'll be handing over the CFO reins to a hugely capable replacement. With that, I'll hand back to Stella. Stella David: Thank you, Rob. It's difficult to beat that because he's got all the numbers, and I've got all the fluffy stuff. So -- and this is the audience for fluffy stuff. You like numbers. So I'll do my best, okay? So look, Entain in 2025 did deliver strategically and financially. So that is a really good starting point. But now our priorities have to evolve because we have to reflect the next stage in our journey, and it's an improvement journey. And we have to build on some of those achievements, but we also have to be bolder in our mindsets. We have to address the significant challenges from the dramatic tax increases in the U.K. So what are we doing about it? Well, we're intensifying our focus on cash generation and disciplined capital allocation. And importantly, today, we reiterated our confidence in delivering at least GBP 500 million in annual adjusted cash flow from 2028. Cash generation being a key component of long-term value creation. And as you can see from this slide -- yes, good, you see from this slide, it is now an explicit strategic priority, called out in our bonusing for our people, called out in our long-term incentive plans, it's a very important part of where we're trying to go. But before discussing our achievements and progress during '25 in detail, these next 2 slides are an important reminder of Entain's foundations. We are a global leader in an industry that is in long-term growth, and we are well positioned. This slide is a powerful visual representation of the breadth and the quality of our business. In Entain's 16 largest online markets, we have a podium position in 13 of them. And we're in the top 4 in all 16. And excitingly, many of these positions have the opportunity for significant growth. So for example, if you take New Zealand, where we are the partner with the New Zealand government for sports betting. We now have a great opportunity in iGaming when it becomes regulated at the end of '26 beginning of '27. And in Spain, we have a great revitalization of our beautiful bwin brand. And we're really hopeful that by the end of 2026, it will also have a podium position. And this next slide is also going to be familiar. I'm a bit boring. I keep showing the same slides, but that's consistency for you. Consistency is good. The left-hand bar chart shows that over 98% of our NGR is locally licensed. And 97% of our online revenue is from markets estimated to grow at least by mid-single-digit CAGR. That is a truly impressive statistic, 97% of revenue coming from markets in good, sustained long-term growth. And the pie charts on the right showcase the diversity of the portfolio by both geography and by product. And it's the combination of all of these things that gives our business the resilience that it needs, underpinning our ability to deliver long-term shareholder value. And now I'm going to share a few of the highlights from across our portfolio in 2025. In the U.K., one of our many initiatives was refining our bonusing, using real-time player data to increase segmentation, reduce bonusing as a percentage of GGR while increasing player value. This bonus optimization on our central platform is also driving benefits in markets like Brazil, Spain, Portugal and Canada. Our U.K. retail team continued to raise the bar with a state-wide rollout of our group bet stations. And this has driven an increase in our market share as well as an increase in our Bet Builder staking. In Australia, our new leadership team adopted a disciplined and returns-led approach, retiring some of the inefficient legacy marketing initiatives whilst also leaning into AI to produce high-quality creative assets more quickly and at a fraction of the cost. Across the group, we've also reduced nonworking marketing spend, centralized performance marketing and improved our allocation of investment. Our strong performance in Spain reflects that reawakening of the bwin brand and also markets like Canada, Brazil, Georgia, all benefiting from refining how our brands engage with our customers. And also some things on product and tech. In Poland, STS migrated onto our Croatia Sportsbook, rebuilt its mobile app and now has a slicker, faster user experience. And in Brazil, we launched Sporting bot for the Club World Cup, an AI personalized assistance to help our customers enjoy the product more. And it's proved to be such a success that it's being rolled out across more markets and more sports this year. So that's just a flavor of the strategy in action. We're seeing improvements to the portfolio because we have shared learnings that generate a powerful multiplier effect, supporting our momentum and our operational efficiency. Moving on now to customer acquisition and retention. And again, this slide will be familiar. Net revenue retention is holding strong. It's above the 85% benchmark, and it has been north of 90% for the entirety of 2025. And this reflects the work that has been done to close product gaps and improve our customer journeys. You'll see there's a slight drop-off in Q4, but that is due to customer-friendly sports results, and it's nothing structural. Customer acquisition also remains comfortably above the 15% level. So if you get the combination of strong net revenue retention and healthy acquisition, that underpins our sustainable growth. And these metrics remain strong as we enter into 2026. As I mentioned with our strategic priorities, Entain is now in the next phase of its improvement journey to accelerate forward. Project Romer delivered over GBP 100 million in savings annually. But we can and we have to do more by continuing to improve on our cost of sales, by optimizing marketing rates as a percentage of NGR and a continued focus on operating efficiencies. We already have multiple work streams identified to deliver against these 3 key levers. And we're also excited by the opportunities that our continued AI enablement program will have for improving the customer experience, the colleague experience and importantly, for increasing our bandwidth, whether that's resolving legacy issues with old -- can't say that, old code. You know what I mean. I hope you know what I mean. Speeding up development cycles to improve the user experience, improving our customer care handling, automating low-quality contracts and legal work or dramatically cutting the cost of asset generation in our marketing areas. So delivery of these type of group-wide initiatives support our expectations to now offset over 50% of the U.K. tax increases from 2027, up from our previous estimate of 25%. I just want to do a slight call out on that. When the tax rates went up, we said immediately, we would mitigate 25%. That was the right thing to say because we haven't done the work at that stage. You need to take the time to add up the numbers and go through the figures to have the confidence. So we didn't come out of the block shouting it's going to be 50% or 60% because that would have been quite frankly, a made-up number. Now we've done the work, and we've got increasing confidence in our ability to deliver against that. And that is the right way to do these things, engage into the business, build the confidence and start to solidify those initiatives. So I just wanted to give that flavor. We're not being dramatic and changing our minds. We're just building on what we started to do immediately after the tax increases, really important points. So let's bring this all together. Despite the jump in those taxes in the U.K., we now remain comfortable with the market expectations for 2026. And when you combine BetMGM and Entain, that means we are delivering a stable set of numbers in '26 versus '25. From '27 onwards, organic growth and those optimization initiatives means that we're going to grow both EBITDA and cash flow and both on a year-on-year basis and importantly, versus 2025. And by 2028, we've got the building blocks in place to achieve at least GBP 500 million in annual adjusted cash flow. And therefore, that will support our journey to getting our leverage back to our target range of 2 to 3x. So let me briefly wrap up before we go into Q&A. 2025 was definitely a strong year. We delivered growth across the portfolio, and that is a highly attractive portfolio that is well diversified. And our relative scale means that we will be winners in the U.K. because we will gain meaningful share from the regulated market. So execution is definitely improving. There's definitely a lot more to do. There always is. That's how you keep being competitive. And we have a clear pathway ahead. So we are confident in it. We are getting more disciplined, and we are accelerating forward. And on that note, I would like to open the floor to your questions, and I will return back over here. Operator: [Operator Instructions]. Monique Pollard: It's Monique Pollard here from Citi. So 2 questions from me. Firstly, on the UK&I, obviously, you've delivered a pretty amazing performance today. You're now materially outperforming, let's say, your main competitor and largest competitor in the market, both on iGaming and sports and even including the comp, so on a 2-year stack, outperforming on both those metrics and taking material market share. Just wanted to get a sense from you of whether you think that can continue as we go into 2026, given some of the initiatives that you've taken on. Second question I had was when we think about the Q4 win margin and that was down 1.4 percentage points in the fourth quarter online sports margin and year-on-year. But obviously, the online EBITDA has come in really good. So what are the sort of measures you've taken to protect that online EBITDA margin despite the unfavorable sports results in the quarter? Stella David: Okay. Great. Well, I think that's 2 questions. So I'll answer one, and Rob will answer the other one. Which one should I do? Okay. I'll take the U.K. and Ireland one because it's been great actually, the revitalization that we've seen in the U.K. And I actually have the U.K. team here. So they are in the audience, so I have to be nice to them. But they genuinely have done a great job. We've done lots of things, improved customer journeys, innovated, more innovation yet to come. We're putting a whole new Ladbrokes experience together before the start of the World Cup. We innovated with the first Bet Builder in horse racing. So there's a lot of focus and there's a lot of energy. And it's energy is really important in these journeys, that belief and that willing to lean in and get it done. So we think there are lots of opportunities, both online where we definitely think we will win share once the new taxes come in place. But let's not forget, we have the best retail estate in the U.K. It's 2,400 shops, great shop colleagues. You would be amazed about their motivation. When we do our global employment engagement survey, they score amazingly. And you think about -- they're not high paid people, but their motivation and their customer care is just outstanding. And those things make a difference to how you perform and how you are relative winners in a marketplace that is going through change. So we're very optimistic. And I can say this because it's true, the U.K. has got off to a great start in 2026. Rob Wood: And then on to the online question. So yes, as you say, win margins below expectations. So in the end, NGR only plus 3%, but volumes plus 9%. How did we still get there on the EBITDA delivery? The main answer is within that gross profit margin point that I made earlier. We've seen great success, particularly this year sort of the continuation of Project Romer. Hugo sat in front of me, his team working on things like payment service providers where we've generated material savings. I referenced it earlier, if you take out Brazil tax, gross profit margin was up about a percentage point. And actually, there were some other tax rises at Netherlands and others that meant that it was even more on an underlying basis. So 1 point across the whole online revenue base, that's GBP 40 million, and actually, it's more like GBP 50 million, GBP 60 million. So that's the primary answer. It wasn't marketing. We spent exactly as we intended to in the second half of the year. We spent GBP 20 million more than we did in the first half, which is what we guided to last summer. So it's really the cost of sales margin or gross profit margin that delivered the catch-up against the NGR miss. Benjamin Shelley: It's Ben Shelley from UBS. Two for me, if I may. One, could you talk about the growth outlook for the U.K. iGaming business, specifically amid the tax changes in that market? And then secondly, on New Zealand, can we expand a bit more on that opportunity? I appreciate it's very early, but what kind of upside do you think that can present to medium-term revenue guidance? Stella David: Okay. Well, we'll try and do them sort of -- I say a bit, you say a bit. Rob Wood: Okay. Stella David: So growth in iGaming, I mean, clearly, there is a market share opportunity here when the taxes go up. If you look at the shape of the business, the bottom 25% share of the iGaming market is through competitors, which are very subscale, 1% percentage share -- 1% share of the market. And they're just ill-equipped to ride the storm with this. So we feel very confident that we will gain share during that journey of the regulated market. Clearly, the black market is going to grow. At the moment, there aren't enough barriers in the way of the black market. And there are still 4 black market operators advertising on the front of football shirts on the Premier League. I spent a letter expressing my concern about that. There is a consultation that's taking place with government. But quite frankly, that should be dealt with now because for all the reasons, the level of interest in the black market is going to go up. But we are in a very strong position. We're very strong in gaming. We have the scale to significantly increase share, which I think we will do. And we factored that partly into our numbers. Anything else on the U.K. before I go into New Zealand? Rob Wood: I mean we also extended the coin economies to Gala and Foxy. So it's not just about Ladbrokes and Coral driving growth in gaming in the U.K. So those brands are responding well, too. Stella David: Yes, that's great. And then on to New Zealand, just as a kind of a bit of background for everybody in case everybody isn't fully up to speed. We are the partner of government in New Zealand. We are the only licensed sports betting operator, and we have that long-term license agreement. Going forward, towards the end of '26, maybe the beginning of '27, there will be licensed operators for iGaming. They're going to be giving out 15 licenses. We are confident that we'll probably get 3 of those licenses. And I think the opportunity for us is significant because we'll be the only player who will be able to do cross-sell, yes. And so therefore, it's too early to say. We haven't explicitly factored it into our numbers, but we have put it forward as one of those opportunity areas that could be significant for us as we go forward. So really exciting. And what's great about the team over in Australia and New Zealand under the leadership of Andrew Boris is they're really leaning into this that they're working very closely with our partners over there. We have 2 brands. Actually, we do under our licensing agreement. We have the TAB brand, but we also have betcha. Betcha is more focused on sports in general, whereas the TAB brand is more focused on horse racing. So we have lots of opportunities going forward. Rob Wood: And maybe put some numbers on it. Andrew probably won't appreciate this, but the opportunity is big. And we estimate that there's around a GBP 600 million marketplace. And currently, we're less than GBP 200 million. So if we have all of sports and a reasonable share of gaming, why can't that below GBP 200 million number go to, say, GBP 300 million. So an opportunity for significant growth over a number of years. Estelle Weingrod: Estelle Weingrod from JPMorgan. I've got 2 questions as well. The first one on your online organic growth revenue guidance. Could you perhaps provide more granularity, more color on the different geographies, what you're baking in like between U.K. and IAC and international? And the second one on the Netherlands. I know it's a small market for you now. But just to understand a bit better how is your -- how was the exit rate and maybe what you're seeing right now in the market because you -- I think you're now lapping some of the affordability check comps that were implemented last year in February. Just to see if you're seeing an inflection in the market now. Stella David: You go and then I'll chip in. Rob Wood: Okay. We'll do it the other way around. So first question, the 5% to 7% guidance, where does it come from? I mean, unusually, I think it's going to be pretty uniform across our segments. So I mentioned it earlier, but international, for example, was below in 2025, but it had the drag from Netherlands and Belgium. I'll come back to Netherlands. So that's now washed through and it exited with 7% volume growth in the second half of the year. And U.K. incredible in '25 with 15% growth. Of course, it won't be 15% in 2026. And so I'd expect those segments to be much more uniform. Plus I mentioned earlier, if you look at the negatives, I'll come back to Netherlands in a moment. But Australia, we do expect Australia to return to growth in '26. And Brazil, when we annualize against those poor margins in the second half of the year, you'd expect growth in Brazil as well. So I think you'll see a more uniform picture. And then the second part of the question, Netherlands. So as at Q3, we were minus 30% at the end of Q3. Then Q4, I think I'm right saying was minus 2%, so you can see a massive difference in performance. So the objective now is to get back into a little bit of growth. But even if we don't, the key thing is we've washed out that minus 30% that we were carrying for 4 quarters. Stella David: Yes. And just one thing to add on Netherlands. It's a kind of -- it's a terrible combination as a market because not only have the gambling taxes gone up significantly, but there's huge amounts of friction for players with very low thresholds in terms of deposit limits, et cetera. And I think I'm right that there's just another tweak up that's going to go on in duty rates, I think from January. Is that right? Yes. I think it's going from 34% to 37.5%, which is, again, a little bit more friction for players there. Richard Stuber: Richard Stuber from Deutsche Bank. Can I ask just a couple of questions on the optimization plan. You talked about it's going to be effective from 2027. I was just wondering whether there are any opportunities to accelerate that? Why don't you sort of start those plans now? And the second question on that as well is, I guess, the initial guidance you gave in terms of U.K. tax mitigation was looking at the U.K. market. So how much of the optimization plan do you think is related to the U.K. and how much is sort of more of a global initiatives? Stella David: Thanks very much. I'll take the first, you take the second. Rob Wood: Yes. Stella David: So I hope I haven't miscommunicated. Optimization plans take place every single day. So it's an ongoing journey. And I think the way that I would describe it is prior to the U.K. taxes going up, we had areas that we were continually thinking about what are the next areas we can improve, whether that's payment service providers, whether it's automation, removing the processes, whether it's using AI to cut down our marketing production costs. So it's an ongoing journey. And if you think about the hit in 2026, we take the big hit from gaming, which is the big increase from 21% to 40% bang first of April. And so without mitigation, we'd obviously have a lower run rate. So we are mitigating and optimizing in 2026 to get to the numbers we have. But some of these other initiatives, they organically happen sequentially over time. And so it will continue to build as we go forward. So it isn't a wait and see. I think everybody is very active in the company looking for those improvements in run rate that come from multiple activities. There isn't one big silver bullet. And I think if I were you, I'd be horrified if there was a silver bullet because why haven't we shot it. So therefore, it is literally multiple activities that go into how we improve the customer experience, how we improve the colleague experience, so we get more efficiency out of them, how we generally cut costs using the tools that are available to us and how we use AI, which is a huge game changer if it's done in the right way, to increase our bandwidth and our capability. A lot of people say AI is about this or that. AI is about enabling us to do more with the resources that we have to help protect us in the future. Rob Wood: And perhaps the only thing I'd add from a modeling perspective, put it through in '27. We're happy with where the market sits for '26 as it stands. And in terms of where is it coming from, where is that initial 25% that we announced last November, that was U.K. focused. The second 25% is a global view for all the reasons Stella has just said, primarily all online, but you can assume it's uniform or proportionate with the segments. There will be a little bit of corporate benefit as well, but the lion's share would be online across all the segments. I think that was the question. Adrien de Saint Hilaire: Adrien de Saint Hilaire from Bank of America, please. A couple of questions. First of all, can you talk about the risk in your view of prediction market platforms coming into your markets and I say your markets beyond the U.S., obviously. And then, Rob, maybe an easy one as the last question. I can see your cash flow Slide 21. You have it down in '26, and I'm not too sure why because you've got stable EBITDA, declining CapEx, declining interest and so on and so forth. So what's the moving part? Stella David: Okay. I'll take the first question on prediction markets outside the U.S. I might even comment on it in the U.S. as well. So in the U.S., there is a unique set of circumstances. It doesn't get taxed like sports betting, and it is not approved by the state regulators. which means that there is a huge amount of prediction markets goes through nonregulated states, particularly California and Texas. I think the percentage going through those 2 states is it's -- I don't know, it's something like 80% of the total volume. There's also a huge amount of play of underage players. So in the U.S., you're going to be 21 to play. So 18- to 21-year olds are playing prediction markets, and they're playing prediction markets in non Luno regulated states. It doesn't touch us that much in the U.S. because we are very much stronger in iGaming, and we never had a business to protect in those nonregulated states. So it is a bit of an anomaly in the U.S. And let me be clear. When people play the prediction markets in sports, it looks like a sports bet, it sounds like a sports bet, and it acts like a sports bet. So I don't think anybody should be any doubt it's sports betting. Now what happens to that legally in the U.S. and have a strong relationship with the regulators. We are in Nevada. Other sports players are not in Nevada. It is a key part of our offering. It's just what I wanted to say that. If you look outside the U.S., equivalents to prediction markets, effectively like betting exchanges with Betfair in the U.K. have existed for decades, and it takes a small single-digit share of the market. There are not the structural reasons for prediction markets to be the hot topic, the flavor of the month in other markets. And indeed, in some countries, they've already come out and said, it's illegal. I think the Netherlands have said, polymarket you're out, otherwise, it's going to cost you $450,000 a week in fines. France has come out against it. So it is a much smaller threat than I think it is -- than people perceive it to be in the U.S. But in the U.S., we're quite comfortable with our position, if that helps. Sorry for the long answer, but I thought it was going to come up at some time. Do you want to take the easy question? Rob Wood: I'll take the easy one. It's easy if I keep it simple. There is more complexity to it. But the simple part of it is Entain EBITDA does go backwards a little bit, as we referenced earlier. So consensus right now is GBP 1,126 million. We delivered GBP 1,160 million in 2025. So there's a little bit of a drop there. The second part of the answer is BetMGM. Even though BetMGM EBITDA does grow, remember, in 2025, we had an outsized cash distribution, including the 2024 surplus. So from a cash perspective, BetMGM is broadly neutral, whereas Entain EBITDA is down a little bit. That's the bulk of the answer. There are some other puts and takes. CapEx is down a bit, interest is down a bit. But that ETR point that I mentioned earlier, that's an offset against that. So the 2 primary drivers, Entain EBITDA down a little bit and BetMGM cash not up, just flat because of the 2024 credit that came through in '25. Luis Chinchilla: I'm Ricardo Chinchilla from Deutsche Bank. I was hoping if you could give us a little bit more of a breakdown of the different buckets for the mitigation strategy for 2026 and 2027. Is it going to be mostly marketing reductions? Do you guys anticipate operational efficiencies from the use of AI? And if you could also comment on how you anticipate the promotional environment to be in the U.K., given that all of the large players have actually referenced the fact that 25% of the market is not going to be able to compete. So we anticipate that there is going to be competition to take that share back. Stella David: Okay. So let me just talk a little bit about mitigation. There are many initiatives. The way we try and sort of bundle them up in the business, we probably put them into probably 8 key buckets of opportunity. It ranges from optimizing our marketing expenditure. It ranges to looking at our cost structure to make sure we're more efficient. It ranges to looking at procurement, lots of opportunity in the very large amount of third-party spend we have. So third-party spend is a very interesting area because we get lots and lots of feeds externally. We have lots of licenses externally. We have lots of external legal fees. I'm just adding them up, giving you a flavor of the different areas that we have. And then the devil's in the detail going down to specific line-by-line item activities. We also see that there is opportunities in terms of hopefully increasing our trading margin sequentially over time. But it takes -- it's a long-run thing, reducing fraud, taking the opportunity to get rid of bonus abusers. There's lots of things that build those buckets up to where they need to be. But I think the thing that I was trying to say is we have a detailed road map. We have sponsors behind that. We have targets that are being set. And we also have specific targets for how we increase the bandwidth from AI, which means that if you think about it, everybody who works in a corporate role or an in-market role or a finance role, they all have to become competent with AI so we can increase efficiency and make those people actually highly employable for the future. But again, efficiencies flow out of doing those kind of things. So there are just many, many initiatives that build up to the total number, yes. Promotional costs, do you want to have a stab at that? Rob Wood: Yes, sure. I'll have a go. So I think you're right. I think the 2 obvious large competitors in the U.K. will lean in as well as ourselves. The fourth largest probably not so much. But then there is such a long tail, as we've touched on earlier. And when you look at one of these staggering numbers as a consequence of these U.K. gambling tax increases, when you look at the tax that we'll now pay in the U.K. as a percentage of profit before tax, it's over 80%. So in how many sectors and how many parts of the world you operate in an environment where your income tax rate is over 80%. That's an astonishing number, which essentially means how can subscale operators possibly want to do business and spend money here. So I think with the exception of the 3 larger operators who I fully expect to want to, just like us, capitalize on it and seize the moment to take market share, I think you will see a lot less promos from mid- to smaller firms. The sort of the unknown dynamic is the black market. Of course, they'll be aggressive, why wouldn't they be? And quite what the impact of that is, we'll see from April onwards. Operator: We're just coming up to time. I'm going to -- just one last question on Italy from Andrew Tam from Rothschild. It wasn't touched on a huge amount in the presentation. Obviously, it remains a key market. So a bit of color on the performance this year and then actually opportunities and actually how you're thinking about going forward. Stella David: Well, I'm happy to just talk about some of the opportunities, and I'll let Robbie okay, just talk about some of the performance at the moment. So we are a distant #3 in Italy, but we do have some exciting plans coming up in 2026. I don't want to share the confidential information. But if you watch this space in the next few weeks, I think we'll be announcing some nice initiatives that will give some more high-profile presence for our business in Italy. There is quite a detailed plan that has been developed to help optimize our position, recognizing that we are disadvantaged in terms of our footprint because we don't do retail gaming. And that is something that is not available to us because we don't have the license and the license isn't open for that. But there are some other things that we can definitely do, but I don't want to spoil the surprise. So, talk about the numbers. Rob Wood: Can I just clarify, these are organic plans in Italy. Stella David: Sorry, definitely organic plans, yes. Rob Wood: So in terms of performance of the business, the way we look at it, we grew online 5% last year, mid-single digits. Retail grew 7%. EBITDA grew 8%. It's a healthy business that's growing nicely year after year after year. That's very well run, tight ship. And so yes, there's a gap to the top 2 operators, but we have a great healthy business in the #3, particularly with Eurobet, which is a very strong brand. Stella David: Are we -- any more questions? Or are we having to wrap now? There was one there. Unless it's a hard one. Pravin Gondhale: I'm Pravin from Barclays. Firstly, on the marketing expense, you sort of mostly answered that, but 45% in second half, given -- I appreciate its mitigation in U.K. seems a bit low given it's World Cup year. So do you think is there any scope in your guidance to sort of raise that if the market demands that, if competitors sort of market hard in second half? And then secondly, on regulation, is the worst behind us or you are still hearing anything in any of your markets there? Stella David: So on the marketing expense, we're investing well throughout the year. We're just shifting it forward because it's World Cup year. So World Cup, even though it's sort of June, July, it goes over 39 days, which is the longest World Cup there's ever been and there's more teams than there's ever been, means that the activity for acquisition, which is one of the things you really want to do in the World Cup comes quite a lot before then. So you're doing -- you do a buildup in terms of marketing. So it does pull investment through into H1. But hopefully, that acquisition then rolls through into H2. But I'm a marketeer by training. If we have any spare money, I'll always put more money into marketing. But we have to deliver the numbers, too. I realize that. So that's obviously an area that we'd always look at going forward. But I think World Cup is a great opportunity. I think it's going to be a bit of a roller coaster ride because there's so many teams playing. In the early days, the margins may be volatile. But hopefully, net-net, the whole thing is going to be an amazing thing, particularly for some of our markets. So given it's in the Americas, our business in Brazil will be really engaged in it. Our business in Canada -- by the way, Canadians, they love betting on soccer. Yes, absolutely love betting on soccer. And also, we've got quite a lot of our markets have teams already in the World Cup final. So we have a high overlap. So I think it will be good for us. And of course, and BetMGM, that small company in the U.S., BetMGM, yes. Regulation. Look, I think it is -- it's our duty to flag the challenges of the increase in taxes and the increase in regulation that it does fuel the black market. I think we talked about the Netherlands earlier. I mean that is the perfectly worst mix. You have highly frictionful regulation and high taxes and their own government or the regulator says that over 50% of their market is black. That is a place that no sensible government would want to go into, in my view, because actually, it's just fueling profits in a different part of the world. And so I think it is the job of people like ourselves to flag the dangers of the black market to try and dissuade other places going like where the Netherlands has gone. Rob Wood: Yes. Can I just make one point of clarification on marketing. So we do expect marketing to increase in absolute terms. You can probably model broadly in line with revenue. So the marketing rate holding firm. It's just the weighting that's H1 related. Yes. And then on regulation, aside from the U.K., then everything else looks a lot more of a balanced picture, which is nice. I know the Republic of Ireland, we have to do a wallet decoupling, which is a small adverse move there. But in Germany, it looks like touchwood, this might be the year that we get an increase in the slots cap, which, as you'll know, has driven the slots market to be 70%, 80% black. So that could be significant for us. We have New Zealand iGaming and other examples of clamping down on the black market as well. So aside from the U.K., and that's a big an aside, but aside from the U.K., it's a more balanced regulatory outlook, I would say. Operator: I draw your attention to the 2 slides that started about the podium positions and our quality of our foundations of our portfolio, which gives us that resilience and the ballast to absorb any regulatory changes. Stella David: I think we're going to have to wrap it up now. But before we do, I just wanted to say a huge thanks to Rob for his huge dedication and passion for this business. He's been in it for 13 years, I think. And I do think if I chopped his arm off, it would actually say Entain. Rob Wood: Glad. Stella David: Should try. No, no. But genuinely, thank you so much, Rob. I really, really appreciate it. And I'm sure everybody in the room, along with all your Entain colleagues, is wishing you the very best in your new ventures when you eventually start them. But he's not going anywhere just yet. He's helping us out on some things until the end of June, but Mike takes over formally as the CFO tomorrow. But Rob is still with us, and we just say thank you so much. Rob Wood: Thank you. Stella David: I'm just going to say something. Rob soak that in. You never get clapped at one of these events ever. This will be the first and last time you get a round of applause. Rob Wood: Thank you very much, everyone. I do really appreciate it. As I said earlier, it's been quite a ride. And you can tell I've been here a long time and also I don't wear suits very often because I looked this morning, and I've got GVC business card. Yes. Thanks, everyone. Stella David: That's funny. Thank you very much. Thank you.
Stephanie Luyten: Good morning. Thank you for joining us as we present Elia Group's Full Year Figures and have a look at what 2026 will bring for the Group. I'm joined today with our CEO, Bernard Gustin; and Marco Nix. Bernard Gustin: Good morning. Stephanie Luyten: Good morning, both. Before we start, please take a moment to review the on-screen disclaimer. It contains some important information you should take note of. And as always, the slides will be and the script will be published on our live stream afterwards. Bernard, I'll let you kick off. Bernard Gustin: Thank you, Stephanie. I want to start by saying how proud I am of what we've achieved this year. Three achievements stand out. First, we secured financing for significant growth and reestablished market trust. When I took on this role, there were questions about our capacity to fund ambitious growth and deliver on our promises. Addressing this was my main focus. And I'm pleased to say that we are back on track. Second, we delivered operationally investing EUR 5.2 billion in CapEx this year, more than triple our historical annual average. And third, we are attracting exceptional talent. Despite challenges, people want to join us because they see Elia Group as a place to make a real difference and help build the energy infrastructure of the future. That tells me we have the right people and the right vision. Stephanie Luyten: Thank you, Bernard. Before Marco takes us through the financials, let's have a look together at the major highlights that defined the year. [Presentation] Bernard Gustin: Well, 2025 was indeed a year marked by major milestones, collective achievements and moments that shaped who we are and where we are heading. When it comes to project execution, 2025 was a year of real tangible progress. In Belgium, we continued to advance on several strategic infrastructure projects that form the backbone of the country's future electricity system. Ventilus and the Boucle du Hainaut, both critical missing links in connecting large volumes of offshore wind and reinforcing Belgium's North-South transmission corridor progressed through key regulatory and construction milestones. These projects are essential for integrating the Princess Elisabeth zone, strengthening system reliability and ensuring Belgium can transport renewable energy efficiently across the country. BRABO III also entered its final stretch, further reinforcing the Antwerp region and enhancing cross-border capacity with the Netherlands. The construction of the Princess Elisabeth Island also continued to advance steadily. The installation of the concrete caisson made solid progress with 11 of the 23 caisson already installed at the sea. And the remaining units are ready for deployment as soon as weather conditions allow it. This brings Belgium another step closer to achieving its decarbonization targets. And in Germany, we also saw real progress. On SuedOstLink+, one of the country's most important North-South transmission corridors with permitting moving ahead and technical preparation advancing, the project is now getting much closer to implementation. At the same time, offshore progress stayed on track. We successfully completed the cable laying for Ostwind 3, the link for the next wave of wind projects at the German Baltic Sea, securing future capacity to integrate more renewable energy. And on Bornholm Energy Island, Germany and Denmark signed a landmark agreement for 3 gigawatts of offshore wind connected through new hybrid grid links to both countries. It's a major step forward future toward future cross-border offshore grids in the Baltic Sea and support Germany's vision for a more meshed and resilient offshore system. We also put 2 new high-voltage lines into service, each over 100 kilometers, boosting our transmission capacity and strengthening stability across key parts of the German grid. So overall, it was a year of strong delivery with our teams moving forward the strategic projects, but at the same time, congestion is becoming more visible. As more renewables connect to the system, and that's a good thing, our consumption patterns also evolve and that is putting pressure on our grid. And this isn't just a Belgian or a German challenge, it's a European one. Our recent study on storage shows just how quickly the landscape is changing. Storage and batteries, in particular, will be a cornerstone of the future system. But equally important is the question, how, where and when storage operates. Today, the current wave of connection request isn't always a healthy growth. We are seeing a huge number of speculative projects across Europe. In Germany alone, TSOs are facing requests equivalent to the load of 100 million households. That's not sustainable. It strains the grid, dodge the queue and delays more mature investments that society actually needs. This is why we advocate for a new approach. We need to prioritize system relevant mature projects and move away from a first come, first serve logic that is now being exploited and risk driving up cost for all consumers. This is where the EU grid package helps set the direction. It supports anticipatory investment and clearer rules so that flexibility, renewables and storage can work together as aligned pillars of a sustainable, affordable and secure system. Marco Nix: And another key factor for our long-term investment needs is the right regulatory frameworks. Based on what we know so far about the German regulation, we welcome BSR's ambition and its recognition that the full package matters for investors. However, the draft framework still does not provide the balanced and internationally competitive returns needed to attract the level of capital required for the grid expansion. Key adjustments are still necessary, particularly on return on equity level, debt cost coverage, OpEx predictability and the effectiveness of the incentive schemes to ensure the framework truly supports the unprecedented investment effort ahead. We remain committed to constructive dialogue to help shape the final determination that safeguards investments capability and supports Germany's long-term energy goals. To speak about 50Hertz goals, we will now share a short video from the CEO of 50Hertz, Stefan Kapferer, on the progress made and the milestones still ahead of us. Stefan Kapferer: With a new focus on resilience of the energy infrastructure and affordability of energy transition, it became clear in 2025 that an overarching responsibility for the electricity system is urgently needed. This can only be delivered by companies like Elia Group with 2 national TSOs, ETB in Belgium and 50Hertz in Germany. In 2026, 50Hertz will once again invest a record high amount of money in additional grid infrastructure, substations and new connections for consumers, EUR 5.1 billion. So affordability of the energy transition will be key. We have to harvest efficiency potential, and we have to take care that only those projects are included in the next grid expansion development plan, which are really needed to make the energy transition happen. And to finance these challenges, the current review of the regulatory framework in Germany has to deliver an internationally competitive return on equity to guarantee that the engagement of the investors will be the same also in the upcoming years. Stephanie Luyten: 2026 will be a year in which significant regulatory developments and grid planning milestones emerge in both our countries, giving us much more clarity on the investment landscape and its associated returns. To build on that, I'd like to turn to the CEO of Frederic Dunon. He will walk us through the challenges and opportunities shaping our next steps. Frederic Dunon: Discussions will begin on our regulatory framework for the period '28, '31. Two major objectives are at stake. First, to ensure that market parties have the right incentives to allow safe and efficient system development and operation. And second, to ensure that Elia has a financial and human means to realize the plans approved by the authorities. The design of our '27, '37 federal development plan will be at the center of attention of our authorities. Indeed, it will define the boundaries of possible futures in terms of energy, industrial and economical policies. Whereas development plans were seen in the past as an administrative process, it is now well understood that they are the foundation of our major society for the coming decades. Stephanie Luyten: Now that we've looked at Belgium and Germany, let's shift to what's happening internationally. As you know, we took a minority investment in energyRe Giga at the end of 2023 with a clear understanding that this is a long development cycle model and that progress would not be linear. Since then, the U.S. environment has evolved. At federal level, the current administration has created uncertainty for offshore wind with slower permitting and approvals while at the same time, many states continue to actively push for grid expansion. In parallel, the U.S. power system is facing rapidly rising electricity demand driven by electrification and data centers, which reinforces the structural need for additional transmission capacity. Last year, we also saw the acceleration of the phaseout of the wind and solar tax credits. This puts pressure on the developers to bring the projects forward and required adjustments in project structures and portfolios across the sector. Against this backdrop, we have taken a disciplined approach, prioritizing value protection over speed. As a result, contributions from energyRe Giga to the Group results will come later than initially expected, but we remain supportive of the investment and of its long-term strategic rationale. As we already flagged at our Q3 results, Clean Path New York faced a setback. For SOO Green, the picture is more positive. Permitting is close to completion and land acquisition is largely secured. Finally, the offshore project, Leading Light Wind is, as you know, currently on hold under the present federal administration. Translated in financials, this means the group recognizes an impairment on its U.S. assets of EUR 99.1 million. This consists of 2 elements. On the one hand, a EUR 70.8 million write-off on the energyRe Giga portfolio, an additional provision of EUR 28.3 million, reflecting the group's remaining commitment to invest USD 150 million to reach its 35.1% ownership stake. Let me remind you that this impairment is a noncash and reflects a prudent reassessment of, on the one hand, value and timing, and it's not at all a change in our discipline or our financial strength. Our exposure remains well controlled. Our commitments are fully manageable within our balance sheet, and we retain flexibility on the pace of future capital deployment. Marco Nix: Thank you, Stephanie. Let me now elaborate on some of the headline figures for '25. We delivered strong progress across all fronts in 2025. Our 5-year CapEx plan remains fairly on track. We invested EUR 5.2 billion, EUR 1.4 billion in Belgium and EUR 3.8 billion in Germany. As a result, our regulatory asset base expanded to EUR 22.6 billion. Our hiring drive in '25 was also a success. We welcomed again more than 760 new employees, strengthening our operational capabilities and supporting the growth objectives we laid out during the Capital Markets Day. On the operational side, system performance remained outstanding. Grid reliability reached 99.9% in Belgium and 99.8% in Germany, positioning our TSOs among the most reliable grid operators in Europe. These figures highlight our continued focus on operational excellence and the effectiveness of our investments in technology, infrastructure and talent. In terms of financial results, the group delivered a strong performance with net profit attributable to Elia Group shareholders of EUR 556.6 million. This corresponds to an adjusted return on equity of 7.3% and earnings per share of EUR 5.51 per share. As shown on the slide, we indeed had a busy year on funding as well. We proactively secured the funding needed to support our strategic priorities in Belgium and Germany. We executed a well-diversified financing program across entities and instruments, reflecting the greater flexibility we have embedded into our funding strategy. A key focus early in the year was strengthening the balance sheet. We completed a EUR 2.2 billion equity package, which reinforced our capital base, broadened our strategic partnerships and provided significant financial flexibility. On the debt side, we raised EUR 3.6 billion in green financing through loans and bonds and both Elia and Eurogrid issued their first EU-labeled green bonds, an important milestone that broadened again our investor base and reinforced the central role of sustainable finance within our capital structure. At the start of the year, Standard & Poor's reaffirmed the credit ratings of all entities. We also strengthened liquidity, bringing the total available funds at year-end at EUR 11.9 billion, which underpins our prudent risk profile and supports our investment-grade ratings. Overall, the group's investment plan is backed by a robust financial framework designed to maintain its current ratings, ensuring continued strong access to capital markets and providing funding flexibility. Finally, the group is progressing on the various options of the funding toolkit as outlined to the market. Elia Group delivered strong operational and financial results reflected in a sharp increase in adjusted net profit. These figures excludes material one-offs and reflects the group's underlying performance. Adjusted net profit rose by 39.8% to EUR 716.5 million, driven by CapEx execution, higher equity remuneration and solid operations. Additionally, the third segment benefited from the first time of a tax benefit linked to the application of tax consolidation in Belgium. Germany remained the largest contributor, delivering just over 60% of the group adjusted result. Belgium added around 38%, while nonregulated activities and Nemo Link contributed EUR 5 million, including EUR 33.4 million in one-off adjustments, the reported net profit reached EUR 683 million. After noncontrolling interest and hybrid costs, net profit attributable to Elia Group shareholders increased by 32% to EUR 556.6 million. On this slide, we show that the reported figures include several nonrecurring items, both in Germany and in the nonregulated activities. We adjust for those to show the underlying performance. Starting with Germany, the reported net profit includes a EUR 46.5 million deferred tax impact. This relates to the revaluation of deferred taxes following the planned reduction in the German federal corporate tax rate from 15% down to 10% between the years '28 to '32. Turning to the third segment. There are 2 main adjusted items. As said by Stephanie, the U.S. impairment amounting to EUR 99.1 million negatively. On the positive side, the tax consolidation had a positive impact due to the application of the Belgium tax consolidation mechanism and linked to the tax periods prior to '25. It is there of a one-off effect, not reflected of a recurring tax benefit. After adjusting for all these items, adjusted net profit amounts to EUR 716.5 million at Group level. Stephanie Luyten: The RAB remains the core driver of the group's regulated remuneration. Supported by the execution of our investment program, Elia Group's RAB increased by 22.5% year-on-year, reaching EUR 22.6 billion at the end of '25, up from EUR 18.5 billion in 2024. This increase reflects the acceleration of major infrastructure projects in both Belgium and Germany that are critical to integrating growing volumes of renewable generation, reinforcing cross-border capacity and strengthening the overall system resilience. These investments ensure we can deliver the energy transition at the lowest societal costs, while contributing to Europe's long-term energy autonomy. When we look ahead, we expect an average annual RAB growth of over 20% for the period '24 to 2028, supported by around EUR 21.6 billion of cumulative CapEx over the next 3 years. As we have invested EUR 5.2 billion across our Belgium and German grids, the impact on our funding metrics remains well under control. Net financial debt increased by around EUR 1 billion, bringing the total to EUR 14.1 billion. This limited increase reflects the successful capital increase and the fact that a large share of our investment was funded through operating cash flows. Our average cost of debt rose slightly to 2.9%, and the portfolio remains very well protected from interest rate volatility with 98% of our debt held at fixed rates. Finally, our credit profile remains solid. Standard & Poor's reaffirmed our BBB rating with a stable outlook, underscoring the resilience of our financial structure and the strength of our funding strategy. Marco Nix: As this concludes the group overview, let me guide you through into the segments, starting with Belgium. In '25, adjusted net profit rose by 27% to EUR 272 million. This was mainly driven by a EUR 30 million increase in fair remuneration, reflecting continued RAB growth, higher equity and improved risk-free rate to 3.2% Incentives were up slightly by EUR 1.1 million. Beyond the regulatory result, the outcomes was also influenced by IFRS restatements. These were mainly driven by higher capitalized borrowing costs from the larger portfolio of assets under construction as well as tariff compensation for the costs linked to the capital increase. This compensation is recorded as equity under IFRS, but these costs are fully passed through to the tariffs under the embedded debt principle. In total, the Belgium segment delivered a return on equity of 6.2% for the year. For Germany, the adjusted net profit rose to EUR 439 million, up 42%. This strong performance is the result of several key factors. First, asset growth continues to be the biggest driver of the result, combined with imputed depreciation and cost of debt coverage. This was further supported by a slight increase in the allowed equity remuneration on new investments, reaching 5.7% for the year. On the cost side, the onshore OpEx outperformance declined slightly by EUR 3 million. The inflation index-based year revenues helped to offset most of the operational cost increases, associated with our expanding activity footprint. At the same time, a number of offsetting effects also incurred. Depreciation increased as several major projects were successfully commissioned and brought online. Financial costs rose due to the higher interest expenses from debt financing. This was balanced by capitalized interest during construction, which increased and interest income from a prefinancing agreement. After including a one-off deferred tax revaluation gain of EUR 46.5 million, net profit reached EUR 485 million. Considering the adjusted net profit, 50Hertz achieved a total return on equity of 11.1% for the year. Finally, the nonregulated activities and Nemo Link segment delivered an adjusted net profit of EUR 5.3 million in '25. This performance was mainly driven by the application of group contributions for the '25 financial year, which contributed EUR 24.7 million to the result. This reflects the Belgian tax consolidation mechanism that allows to utilize a tax loss at the group level and Eurogrid International. The positive impact followed a legislative change adopted at year-end, which removed the discriminatory treatment previously applicable when combining the group contribution regime with the dividend received deduction regime. This positive effect was partly offset by several factors, mainly higher holding company costs, a lower contribution of our consultancy business, EGI. Finally, Nemo Link contributed slightly less to the result. After taking into account net adjusted items, the net loss amounts to minus EUR 74.5 million. Stephanie Luyten: Before we move to the final part of the presentation, our financial guidance for 2026, I'd like to briefly touch on the group's dividend policy. Elia Group proposes a dividend of EUR 2.05 per share. This dividend proposal will be submitted for approval at the Annual General Meeting and is expected to be paid in June 2026. Marco Nix: Ending with the outlook for '26, Elia Group expects a net profit at Elia Group share in the range between EUR 690 million and EUR 740 million. In Belgium, we plan to invest around EUR 1.7 billion, delivering an adjusted net profit between EUR 290 million and EUR 320 million. While in Germany, we plan to invest around EUR 5.1 billion and an adjusted net result in the range of EUR 585 million and EUR 625 million. The nonregulated and Nemo Link segment is expected to report an adjusted loss of minus EUR 10 million to EUR 30 million. Bernard Gustin: Well, thank you, Stephanie. Thank you, Marco. Before we move into our Q&A session, let me share some closing remarks with you. Earlier this year, the Hamburg North Sea Summit highlighted the urgency of building an integrated offshore grid with European TSOs presenting a joint framework for hybrid interconnections and shared cost models capable of enabling up to 1,000 terawatt hour of clean energy by 2050. At the same time, the Hamburg declaration committed key North Sea countries to delivering 100 gigawatts of joint offshore wind projects, underscoring that system security and sovereignty will increase, increasingly depend on collaborative offshore development rather than isolated national solutions. Complementing this, Mrs. von der Leyen, underscored at the recent Antwerp Industry Summit that Europe's continued dependence on fossil fuels exposes industry to volatile price swings and highlighted the urgent need to reduce this exposure by accelerating the shift towards stable homegrown clean energy sources. The current war in the Middle East underlines once again how vulnerable Europe remains to external shocks. Strengthening and interconnecting the European grid is, therefore, essential, not only to expand access to affordable clean electricity, but also to reinforce Europe's energy sovereignty and reduce dependence on increasingly unstable fossil fuel supply. In this context, Elia Group stands out as the only international electricity transmission group in Europe, combining a multi-country footprint, deep operational presence in both the North and Baltic Seas and a public-private capital structure capable of aligning public anchors with long-term private investors behind strategic and critical infrastructure. This combination is exceptionally unique in our sector and precisely what Europe needs in these troubled times. Our leadership is most visible in our flagship hybrid interconnector portfolio, the first of its kind in Europe and the foundation of tomorrow's meshed offshore grid. Kriegers, yes, thinks and acts on European scale. Together with Energnet, they already have put the world's first hybrid interconnector Kriegers Flak into operation. Furthermore, together with Denmark, they will realize Bornholm Energy Island, unlocking large-scale offshore wind in the Baltic Sea and connect through hybrid HVDC links. And in Belgium, Princess Elisabeth Island and Nautilus could form one of Europe's earliest true hybrid offshore hubs, pulling up to 3.5 gigawatt of offshore wind, while interconnecting Belgium and the U.K. HansaLink, a key project of our entity WindGrid, expands this logic across new cross-border corridors, drawing private capital into offshore infrastructure at scale. And with Nemo Link operating reliably for years, we have already proven our capability to deliver, operate and maintain complex interconnectors safely and efficiently. This portfolio is unmatched in Europe. No other player combines so many hybrid assets across the 2 strategic European sea basins under one group, not as concept, but as concrete investable projects that show how offshore wind and interconnection can be planned, financed and built together. Thank you for your attention. Stephanie, I think we are now ready to move to the Q&A section. Stephanie Luyten: Yes. Thank you, Bernard. And in the meantime, Yannick Dekoninck, our Head of Corporate Finance, has also joined us. Stephanie Luyten: So let's turn to the screen. I see that our first question comes from UBS, Wanda. Wierzbicka Serwinowska: Congratulations on the results and the CapEx delivery because there were some concerns last year if you will deliver. The first question -- I mean, 2 questions to Marco. The first one is on the capitalized cost at the net income level. I mean, what was it in 2025 for 50Hertz because I couldn't see it disclosed. And what is embedded in your 2026 guidance? And also, if you could give us any rough guidance on the capitalized cost until 2028, that would be much appreciated. It's a very hard to model item. And the second question is on the S&P. As you said, back in September, S&P confirmed the rating, but they also said that the Elia Group consolidated business risk has marginally increased. And they raised the FFO to net debt threshold by 100 bps. And they also assume that your CapEx post-2029 will moderate. So does a higher FFO to net debt requirement worry you when thinking about CapEx plan or funding beyond 2028? Marco Nix: Maybe start with the technical question then on the capitalized borrowing costs. It's indeed something we are mindful of in the figures of '25, which are subject to disclosure finally, with the annual accounts at year-end, there's a part close to EUR 90 million considered in the German figures. So what is a noncash result contribution. So -- and that puts a little bit 11% into a certain perspective as, of course, this is being included in the 11% guidance. For the future growth, it's indeed linked to some degree with the investments to be taken. However, it's not linear simply as we try to limit the impact to some degree, and it's being connected to a relatively short period between 2 milestones of the projects, where I must admit that that's a little bit hard to model in the future. But I assume on one hand, that the IFRS standard is subject of a change, which might help us then in the future to limit that impact. However, it will grow. And as a rule of thumb, potentially, it's good to look into the investments in the year being taken compared with the previous year, how it will be growing in the year '26. Wierzbicka Serwinowska: So what should we -- what is embedded in your guidance because your guidance for 50Hertz was running much, much above consensus? Marco Nix: In the guidance of 50Hertz, it's a similar area, so between EUR 90 million and EUR 100 million. So that's currently what we have embedded there. Bernard Gustin: And then... Marco Nix: So then on the FFO to net debt. So currently, after the capital raise, we feel rather comfortable, in particular, with an eye on the liquidity position the group currently has. So therefore, we are not in a rush. Of course, we are looking into the horizon beyond '29. But as we stated, it's subject of the new CapEx plan, which is still under development as both the grid development plan in Germany and the federal development plan in Belgium is still under construction, if you want to say it like this. And as this is the underlying combined with the regulation of our future capacity in funding and of course, in remuneration, that is a necessary input for our funding plans. And of course, the rating will play a significant role in there as, of course, we don't expect that the growth will stop and taking that into perspective, there's a solid investment-grade position being needed to fund the investments in the future as well. Stephanie Luyten: Thank you, Wanda. Let's go to the next question. I believe it's from Bank of America, Julius. Julius Nickelsen: I have 2. The first one is on German regulation. So in the draft methodology that came out in December, I think the BNetzA for now ruled out the concept of a return on equity adder. But I believe since then, you've and the other TSO have provided some evidence why there should be an adder. So if you have any update, do you still believe that this could come in the final methodology? Any update on the reception that would be quite useful. And then the second question is a little bit more high level. But if I look out to like beyond the summer and towards the end of the year. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think at that point in time, you should have the new Belgium returns, the final methodology in Germany and a good idea on the grid development plan in both countries. Could there be a point in time where you will upgrade the market -- update the market on your investment plan and maybe roll forward to 2030 with the new CMD? It would be useful to know. Marco Nix: Maybe starting from the last question and then developing to the other ones. Our expectation will be more towards year-end or beginning of next year to have that clarity as there are some specific aspect that you name a few of them in the regulation, but on the CapEx plan as well. To name a few, in Germany, that will be the total amount and the sequence of the offshore grid connections, which will play a big role in our CapEx program, or the question on overhead lines versus cabling in the big DC corridors. And that will, of course, change significantly the means being needed to realize that CapEx program. And this debate, to be fair, is still open. So there, we do not see really a landing zone for the time being. A little bit the same in Belgium with the Princess Elisabeth Island and the DC components or the interconnector there. Even though government will potentially take a position then in the second quarter, you do see kind of delay in that decision-making as this was originally being foreseen in March. So therefore, likely that it's more towards the end of the year where we have that kind of clarity. So on the point you mentioned in regards to the framework, in the conference, BNetzA hosted, they stated a little bit that they are not convinced yet on an adder to the return on equity. That's still a subject of a discussion, at least they opened the door for, and we provided some evidence that this is being needed. But it's fair to say there's an ongoing discussion on that one. What is, first of all, a positive sign that the door has not been closed. But so far, it's not being drafted in any adjustment of the determination of the return rates for the future. Stephanie Luyten: Thank you, Julius. Are there any other questions? I do not see -- Temi. Good morning, Temi, please go ahead. We have you here with us. Temitope Sulaiman: Congrats also on the results presentation this morning. I've got a couple of questions, but I'll keep it to 2. One is just clarity on your 2026 net debt expectations. If you can provide an update on that, that would be very helpful. Clarity on the Belgian regulatory time lines in terms of the consultations, but also the final determinations. And then finally, it seems that you've had strong operational delivery in Belgium and Germany, '24, '25, '26, you've raised the guidance above consensus expectations. And I'm just wondering whether you might consider revisiting your '24 to '28 guidance in terms of returns and when maybe you might consider that? Yannick Dekoninck: Maybe net debt, I will take. So on net debt for '26, we expect to land with the CapEx that we have announced at a net debt of around EUR 19.5 billion. So that's what we are targeting for in '26. Marco Nix: On Belgium regulation, there's a relatively straightforward path being published. So there will be a public consultation on 14th of April, if I'm not -- 17th or mid of April. Bernard Gustin: [indiscernible] Marco Nix: Mid of April. So happy to invite you to comment on that one once it is being out there and a final determination in the course of quarter 2. So end of half year, there is likely a robust visibility how the scheme will look like. Stephanie Luyten: And in terms of guidance? Marco Nix: Guidance, I think we still stick to the guidance which we have given as the growth is still intact with the double-digit percentage growth on the EPS and on the net results to the shareholders and around, as you have seen in the past, the 20% growth on the RAB. So that's quite consistent to each other, even though the guidance for '26 seems to be a little bit higher than the expectation, if you make it linear, but that comes from some of the aspects, which are not that fully linearized as we try to optimize the results, of course, as we can. And in connection with commissioning, for instance, we might have one or the other year an outliner and '26 seems to be one of them as a couple of significant investments come to commissioning, which gives us a favor in particular, in Germany. Stephanie Luyten: The next question will come from Piotr from Citibank. Piotr Dzieciolowski: I have a couple of questions. So the first one I wanted to ask you about this financial result in 50Hertz. So in your disclosures, you also point out apart from increased capitalized interest, you point out to accrued interest from the developer of an offshore platform of EUR 28 million, plus EUR 10 million from discounting effects on long-term provisions. So just wanted to understand, can you please explain on this first item what it really means? And is there any change on these numbers between '25 and '26? So I'm trying to get a bridge between '25 and '26 financial item. Is it just capitalized interest going up and these things disappear? Or how shall we think about these items? And second question, I wanted to ask you about your actual performance. So in your Slide 20, sorry, Slide 19, you said that the net income of ETB increased by EUR 1 million because of incentives. I was under impression that the incentives should grow in line with RAB with the size of the business, but it doesn't seem so. So can you please tell us how do you assume the incentives increment between the '25, '26? And likewise, you don't disclose incentives for the 50Hertz. I think there are some outperformance. So can you also say like operationally, do you improve -- or do you keep like a size of outperformance in line with the business growing with RAB growing or that basically the incentives and outperformance becomes bigger -- smaller relative to the size of RAB and so on. So these were 2 questions. Marco Nix: Okay. Maybe taking the first one on the wind farm contract, which we closed. So there's a nearshore wind farm at the German coast, which is being connected by 50Hertz in an AC technology. And for efficiency reasons, we agreed on to share the platform with the wind farm developer so that not both needs to have a platform being erected, what saves costs for both sides. And it's more or less a 50-50 split there. As the wind farm developer pushed back for some of the costs to some degree, and we had a relatively long-lasting negotiations on that one. We finally agreed on that the funding costs, the financing costs of this chunk, which is related to the final agreement, and which will be borne by the wind farm operator are being out of the regulatory sphere. So that's something the 50Hertz and Elia Group can keep finally. And the number you referred to is the accumulated interest income over the periods once we started that construction. So the effect itself will remain, but the order of magnitude will potentially go down as this is a kind of loan agreement, which is related on one hand to the size and the second to the scheme where there's some flexibility on the wind farm operator side once they are paying us, then, of course, the interest connected to the outstanding exposure will be lower in one of the years. And as this wind farm will likely be -- the connection of the wind farm will likely be finished in '26 and the wind farm operator will potentially commission its assets then beginning of '27, despite the fact that there's a 15 years period on that contract, there might be some changes over time in the payment scheme as the flexibility is on the wind farm operator. So that's a little bit long explanation. It's relatively complex matter, but likely that there will be an interest income over a certain period of time with different kind of order of magnitude. Bernard Gustin: Okay. And maybe, Piotr, on your question on the incentives in Belgium, it's indeed correct that they increased by EUR 1 million compared to last year. And it's indeed correct that they are, to a certain extent, correlated with the RAB, but as well, they are -- they have in the regulation a maximum amount that you can have on certain incentives. So that's one element. And some of the incentives are a bit, I would say, binary between 0 to 1. If you remember last year, we had a cable issue linked to the availability of the MOG in '24. So we had no incentive at that year. This year, we have a full incentive, a full maximum amount. So that gives a little bit why you don't see exactly that linear evolution on the incentives. Nevertheless, I think we had a solid operational results where incentives remain quite important to the overall result in Belgium. Stephanie Luyten: Let's now turn to Deutsche Bank, Olly. Olly Jeffery: Two questions from my side, please, like everyone else. So the first one just is on CapEx. Now I appreciate that you need to wait for the grid development plans to give a precise view on future CapEx for '29 onwards, and that's more likely to impact presumably CapEx in the 2030s. Are you able to give kind of a high-level view in Germany of kind of the broad level of increase you think might be likely given that most of the changes to the grid development plan are probably going to impact in the 2030s. Any insight you can give there would be helpful. And then secondly, just on funding the plan from '29 and onwards. I know obviously, you don't want to be precise about this. But could you say, is there a credible scenario where you think you might be able to fund CapEx in '29 and 2030 without the need for equity using the rest of your equity toolkit with the hybrids and opening up the capital structure of some of the TSOs potentially? Any views on that would be great. Bernard Gustin: Taking the first one, it's still, as we said, a little bit too premature to lay out a number. So if you take the total volume, which is currently as a price tag being seen on a total grid development plan in Germany, you can compare the EUR 320 billion, which was the number in the last grid development plan, which the EUR 340 billion, which is currently the number connected to the most likely scenario. It's not chosen yet, but that gives a little bit the view that likely the outcome will be rather the same with an eye on EUR 345 billion in terms of euros. However, there will be a kind of different allocation on that one. And that what makes it that's hard for the time being really to say the CapEx is further growing or going down at a certain point of time. As, of course, only part of the EUR 340 billion are connected then to 50Hertz to the Elia Group. So as a rule of thumb, it was 20% all the time. But the spread over 20 years is a difference than the spread over 10 years. So that's -- I mean, that's the simple math. And as the former government was quite in a rush to complete or to set very ambitious targets, which partially have been out of reality, the current government is more pragmatic in that view, and that's a little bit what still the debate is on. Stephanie Luyten: And on the funding? Marco Nix: On the funding, I mean, we have full flexibility now. So that's currently what we are going to execute. That's all our options are valid. We are working on further optionalities as well. But please, as we don't have the CapEx numbers currently in place, we do not want to give guess how we are continuing to fund the growth in the future at this moment. Stephanie Luyten: Nor do we have the regulatory framework set in place? Bernard Gustin: Yes, it's a bit early... Stephanie Luyten: So I think it would be a bit too early. But thank you for the questions. I see the next questions will come from ODDO, Thijs. Thijs Berkelder: A couple of questions. Do you still require probably an additional EUR 2 billion of equity? And can you confirm that you still aim to raise this via in principle, EUR 4 billion of hybrids? Second question is on your Energy Island and the DC connectivity there as well as for the U.K. connector. The HVDC cost price was too high. Any reason in your view why HVDC pricing now should be lower? And third is on the North Sea offshore wind projects targeting 15 gigawatts installations by 2031. What can we expect as impact for your CapEx from that plant compared to what we currently are installing on the North Sea? Marco Nix: Yes. Maybe starting with the first one. Our toolkits provide us flexibility, and we stated that it can be both hybrid -- the hybrid capacity potentially being sufficient at this point of time, while another option is to open the capital on one of the subsidiaries and/or finding structural solutions to help us funding the growth. And that's still something we are closely monitoring. And there's a couple of key elements to be considered and criteria's in the decision-making, once is timing. Another one is, of course, cost of capital. Third one is execution to name a few of them. And as we have a strong liquidity position and of course, the credit rating is comfortable as well. So we are carefully looking for the best solutions there. And once this is being decided, it can be both extremes. So both elements of the toolkit would gives us the credit in total, so it has the potential. However, it could be a combination as well depending on the point of time where we make the decision. Bernard Gustin: On the Princess Elisabeth Island, I would say that, first, it was the right decision to postpone the project because, as you know, at the time, we were really in a very heated market on the HVDC component. However, the teams have been working on updated design. We have also some very good discussion between U.K. and Belgium on how to best share the cost and the benefits of the project. And I hope that in the coming weeks, months, we can come with a solution that fits with the original objectives, while being more reasonable from a cost point of view. We see that the HVDC technology remains an expensive technology, but we also see that the heat that we had a few months ago is a little bit lower. On your North Sea approach, which actually the Princess Elisabeth Island is a subpart of. As I explained in my conclusion, I think we are really, as Elia Group extremely well positioned being the only transmission group having a portfolio of assets already in our base today. But of different nature because we have the Belgian port on the North Sea. We have the projects on the Baltic Sea with Windanker's. But we have also with our subsidiary, WindGrid, a project called HansaLink. And the advantage, of course, of this setup is that it's a setup where you can also use financial players who can help the financing of the project. So I'm not going to preempt on the decision of Europe. I think, by the way, we see with what's happening now in the Middle East that it's high time that we reduce our dependency on gas and that offshore wind in the North and the Baltic Sea is a critical element in there. We will see how Europe will evolve in -- and the grid package already goes that direction, but how they translate that into a series of projects. But I think what's interesting is that Elia by its strategic geographic positioning, by its current portfolio of projects, but also by its setup where we can leverage financing capital at different levels is very well placed to play a role in there. And already in our current portfolio of projects and in our current asset base, we have projects on both seas in the North and in the Baltic Sea. Stephanie Luyten: Are there -- yes. I see the next question coming. Unknown Analyst: And also from my side, compliments for the good results and outlook, of course. Yes, on the -- I'm still going to try on the North Sea, and thank you for the answers so far. But looking at the ambitions and with the involvement of TSOs as well in these kind of framework ambitions that were published, a step-up to 15 gigawatts already in 2031 and for a number of years, even a decade. And now looking at your CapEx approaching EUR 7 billion. So let's say, connecting all these gigawatts already upfront or preparing for that upfront and for a number of years to come. Is it fair to say that, yes, maybe previous assumptions on EUR 7 billion being the higher end of forward CapEx. Is that something that we need to reassess to a larger number, higher number? That's my first question. And the second one is on CapEx, and it's a great achievement that, of course, you met the expectation after the -- I think the questions that were raised at the midyear presentation. What should we expect for 2026? Will it be a more balanced picture of the EUR 6.8 billion or also 1/3, 2/3, maybe some guidance there. Bernard Gustin: I will take the first one and let the team go for the second one. I think the guidance remains the same. So we are on EUR 7 billion CapEx because we are talking on a series of projects that we know. Then we will have to see how the developments happen, and we will be looking at it as you do. And according to the developments, of course, Elia Group wants to position itself on these developments. But I think then there will be also another way at looking at it. And I think from the European standpoint, from the political standpoint, we will have also to think of the tools to make sure that we can reach those developments without having always a direct impact on the balance sheet of the TSOs. And that's where I say with some of our tools like WindGrid and so, we are very well placed to test those type of model. We will also have to see what Europe does in terms of SAF funding and other conditions. So just to say, within the current framework, we are in the current guidance, and there is no reason to change. Of course, we remain attentive and opportunist of what it would develop. But I think then there would be other ways of looking at the thing and not directly in the CapEx of a TSO, which will be one of the topic to manage if we want to reach this great ambition, but also needed ambition when you see the situation of Europe. Marco Nix: And maybe to complement, we published recently a paper then which could be a way forward in the future to fund in particular the far offshore wind farm developments and the connection to that one mainly via hybrid interconnectors, where we are facing several constraints to go ahead there, and that could be an element with the so-called WSPV concept, which helps both on one hand to unlock a little bit resistance in one or the other countries. And secondly, combine the forces with giving some securities by public authorities like European investment banks, for instance, and combining with private capital to fund that in the future, as Bernard rightly said, it's questionable whether all TSO can absorb simply these big request of capital in the future. In regards to our CapEx program, it's likely that you will do see a heavy loaded second half year again as this is, on one hand, a little bit in nature as during the summer, most of the construction is being made. And then, of course, we usually account for the progress once a certain milestone has been reached, and that's likely more in autumn than in spring. And the second one is that at least in Germany, gives us a favor to have that backloaded profile. As usually, you get remunerated for the average of the year while -- for the capital cost as well. While, of course, the later you will have it, the bigger the gain could be. And that's something which we have seen in the results as well as, in particular, the difference between the real funding costs and the funding costs, which are being embedded in the grid fees gives us a favor to some degree and contributes to results, too. Stephanie Luyten: And let's go to Wim from KBC. Wim Hoste: Yes. I hope you can hear me. Stephanie Luyten: Very well. Marco Nix: Yes. Wim Hoste: All right. Also congrats from me. Lots of questions have been asked. I just want to throw in some add-ons. If I want to come back to the financing, the equity raise potential, and I understand regulatory framework has to be put in place. Can you give an idea, suppose that if you want to do something like an ABB like in '24, EUR 0.5 billion, if that's possible, what you need to do, whether you would need to have some kind of Board's agreement first, if that's a possibility simply because the share price has rallied quite a lot. It's more than doubled since the last capital raise. So how you feel about that? Then smaller questions on the dividend. I think in the past, you said that, that would go in line with inflation. I think it stays more flat now. Is that also the outlook for the future? I completely would agree that would make sense as well. And then lastly, more like a general question and something that we've seen in the U.S. where the government has asked big tech to -- yes, basically pay via some kind of taxes to upgrade the grid because obviously, we know that, that demands a lot of investments to accommodate all the hyperscale investments. So just your view, is that something that could be possible in Europe? Obviously, things move a little bit slower. But if there's anything that you can say just in order to kind of divert the pressure that we have seen and the pushback from industry and consumers on -- yes, obviously, offloading a lot of the investments via the energy prices. So those are my 3 questions. Stephanie Luyten: Maybe I can tackle the dividends, if you like. We indeed gave a dividend or proposing a dividend of EUR 2.05. But what you need to take is as a basis is actually the EUR 2 because when we did the capital increase, we actually restated the dividend. And if we were to increase the dividend on a restated basis, it would be close to EUR 2, but we did not want to pay less than last year dividend. So we have increased it slightly. That has been our rationale for the EUR 2.05. Marco Nix: And we do see that as a strong signal that the investment in the Elia Group is a value-accretive one and the dividend payment is one of the elements there. So that gives some certainty that our growth path is intact. Stephanie Luyten: Regarding the ABB, what do we need to have in place for that? First of all, yes, we will have to have an authorized capital in order to do such a transaction. But we -- as Marco already highlighted today, we are not looking to use any nondilutive -- we are looking to use nondilutive options. And I think there, we have enough flexibility. The way forward would be towards the future to bring back unauthorized capital, put that in place, and that are the first steps that we need to take. Bernard Gustin: And on the U.S., well, first of all, it reminds us of the potential in the U.S. We have a little bit of a setback at the moment, but we are convinced that over the long run, we know the situation of the grid in the U.S. It's certainly not at level with the AI ambition that the U.S. has and the battle of AI will pass via a strong grid. So I think it's good that we are positioned in there. It will take a little bit more longer than expected, but I'm convinced that the potential is the same because the grid becomes a critical asset in every region of the world that want to electrify. The debate, of course, is who needs to pay, and we see the investments that the hyperscalers are doing and all things relative, the investment in the grids are indeed a fraction of the investments they are generally doing. So the idea to make them contribute is a political decision where it will be difficult for me to take a position, but it's clear that we've seen in our countries that the development of AI and data centers is representing a certain burden on the net, burden on the consumption. And I think at some point, there are 2 positions that need to be taken. The first one is what do we want in terms of industrial development and where do we give the priorities in terms of segments, AI, data centers versus general industry. And then how do we make sure that the general consumer is not hampered by a consumption that is not responsible for. So I think I don't know what is the exact recipe, but the direction is certainly a direction to investigate. Marco Nix: And maybe to complement on that one, on one hand, there are multiple congestions on all these connection requests. So funding is one. So in Germany, for instance, the consumers are not paying for the direct connection. It's indeed then the applicant. On the other side, we do see that the grid is heavily loaded and simply that makes a congestion in connecting a new device to the grid. So as this is something we need to be careful of as well to protect our people in doing the works there. And last but not least, it's not all the time that visible how mature the project is. And our lead time, it's fair to say, are still longer than the ones from this developer. And as they want to go in a staged process usually with extending the devices which are consuming them at the stage, but we are designing the -- yes, the connection only once. So that's all the time a little bit mismatch in the planning horizon. That's something which we need to work on commonly to make sure that we do see how mature the project is that we can give some access being granted and we can rely on that one as well as, of course, we want to prevent that we invest in an area where nothing is going to happen. As we honestly have seen in Germany with the ship industry as Intel canceled the big factory in an area of Magdeburg, and then the TSO was forced to bring down the commitments in that area. However, the land has been already being acquired. So that's a mismatch, which we need to be careful on as, of course, we need to protect then the final consumer, as Bernard rightly says, that we are not socializing cost of the industry, yes. That's a little bit what we are in. Bernard Gustin: But it's clear that AI needs the grid, but the grid also needs AI. And we will also -- and we are really developing an AI strategy and developing -- we are already using a lot of AI, but we want to accelerate there because AI is also a way to solve some of the bottleneck issues that we have today. So it's really a very close relationship, both ends. Stephanie Luyten: Let's now move to Juan from Kepler. Juan Rodriguez: I have 2, which are more of a follow-up, if I may. The first one is on guidance. Can you please confirm that you have no additional hybrids included on your 2026 guidance? And on guidance as well, what is the targeted return on equity that you have on Belgium and Germany within the guidance that you've given, especially on Germany as is substantially above expectations? And the second one is on the U.S. impairments. What are your expectations now in terms of the timing and size of the expected earnings contribution that you expect in the region going forward? If you can give us more clarity on that, that will be helpful. Marco Nix: You take the hybrid? Yannick Dekoninck: I think in the guidance that we have given is a guidance that takes into consideration multiple options that we have in the funding toolkit. So we do not exclude -- to be clear, we do not exclude a hybrid issuance, but the guidance that we have published this morning takes into consideration multiple options. Now in terms of return on equity, as you know, we are not guiding specifically on the return on equity for a specific year. We have guided on the return on equity over the period, over the regulatory period, both in Germany and Belgium. So that's still something that we are targeting for, knowing that you could have certain variability year-over-year due to important one-off effects like we had this year. That's also why we have been very clear on what that one-off effect was in Germany. Marco Nix: So to remind you, the average guidance which we have given was between 7% and 8% in Belgium, while in Germany, it was 8% to 10%. Stephanie Luyten: Yes. And on the impairment? Bernard Gustin: Did we miss one? Stephanie Luyten: Yes. I think on the U.S. impairment on the timing, when we could expect a positive contribution, but that one is a little early to say today because there's still a lot of uncertainty on when those projects and how and when they will materialize, but that's more towards the end of the decade, I would say. Bernard Gustin: Yes. And it's clear that, as you know, we have 3 projects, the project on Clean Path, New York, which is a line in New York, didn't pass some regulatory approval, what we call a priority transmission project, but it doesn't take away that New York needs an extra transmission line. And so we will use the assets to participate to further project development. So there, we believe we are rather facing a delay. You know the uncertainty that exists today in the U.S. about the offshore and things can turn very quickly one way or the other. So our strategy there is to secure the assets that we have in place. We have already the leasing rights on this project, that's Leading Light Wind. And on SOO Green there for the moment, that's a project that, as Stephanie explained in the presentation, continues on its path of the different regulatory hurdles. And so there, for the moment, there is no reason to review the project. So as you say, we are rather delaying in time. But as I said to your colleague just earlier, I'm convinced that the fundamentals stay and at some point, somebody will see that these projects are heavily needed. Marco Nix: So in the '26 guidance, there's no positive contribution being expected to make that clear. Stephanie Luyten: Thank you, Juan. Let's now turn to Alberto from Exane. Alberto de Antonio Gardeta: Congratulations for the results. A couple of follow-ups from my side. The first one is regarding the German regulation. Maybe if you could -- based on the like already published consultation papers, if you could quantify what are your expectations in terms of ROE and WACC based on the current consultation papers and what else is needed? So maybe if you could give us some guidance of what will be your expected level of returns in order to get the competitive returns that you need for being competitive in the equity markets? And the second one will be regarding the potential update to the market, the potential Capital Market Day. You have said that maybe by the end of the year or beginning of 2027. When do you know that we will have more visibility if this is happening or if we can consider as confirmed or it's still pending? Stephanie Luyten: I think maybe I'll start on the Capital Markets Day. That's still very much pending. As Marco clearly said, there are still a lot of moving factors. We don't yet have clarity in Germany. And also in Germany, the final elements will only be defined somewhere in 2027. So that's why we cannot fix to a date somewhere in the future. So next to that, we also have grid development planning that is ongoing in Belgium, in Germany. Those time lines aren't super fixed neither. So this will be something, I think, towards the end of the year, we will have more clarity on. So I do not expect us to really do a CMD still this year. Marco Nix: So to come to the German regulation, if you really look into the paper, even though it's heavy reading, I would say, it's for the time being, for our perception, more a description of a structural approach while the ingredients are not being flagged yet. And even though a WACC model could be something comparable, but the big debate on the cost of debt coverage is not finished yet. So that's still ongoing, but a rating adjustment is being made, which kind of reference rate is being used. These elements are still pending. That's why it's a little bit too early really to say what the outcome could look like, and we previously discussed equity or return adder for the TSOs, what is still in the discussion, which is not in yet. So I would say we are not there yet with that what we assume BSR could deploy. However, our clear target is not being worse than today. And if you take the return on equity, which we disclosed and take off all the accounting items, there's still a return rate above 8.4%, which is, if you want to name it, a kind of cash return. And as BSR already said, the total package matters, that's something we are requesting, and that's something which we are targeting to get out of it. Which elements shall we put in place. There, we have some openness. So if there's an incentive being put in place, which gives us an order of magnitude lending there, we are fine with it as well. We are happy to get challenged in terms of our operations. But so far, it's not really clear. So therefore, we are hesitating to give a guidance what it could give for the time being. Stephanie Luyten: Thank you, Alberto. Let's now -- I see Olly, you have some further follow-up questions? Can you hear us, Olly? Olly Jeffery: Yes. Just one follow-up question, please. Going back to the discussion on the capitalized interest within the guidance for '26 at 50Hertz. Is that -- which is noncash. Is there anything else within that '26 guide 50Hertz that is noncash in addition to the capitalized interest that we should know about? Or is that the only item? Marco Nix: I wouldn't say it material. There is -- now we come a little bit in great territory as we assume commissioning, which gives us a full depreciation in the revenues, there's a cash connected to that one, while the depreciation is lower, the real depreciation, which we are recording in that year. So for us, it's a cash item, which contributes to the results as well. While the capitalized borrowing cost is a noncash item as this is reverted later stage. So -- and therefore, I would keep it on that one, knowing that, of course, the example which I raised could give us a favor in the results of next year as well. And as I said, if you only linearize that, the result would look a little bit outstanding compared to that linearization in line with the CapEx, which you otherwise would compute. Yannick Dekoninck: And maybe if I can complement it, Marco, for those that have been following us for a couple of years, you see that we also have sometimes discounting of interconnecting provisions or interconnected income. As you know, you -- sometimes have spike in the forward rates that has an impact on those long-term provisions. That's not something that we estimate or take into account in the guidance as such, but that's always something that can happen. We were confronted with that a little bit at the end of Q4 of this year, where the interest rates started to move up. But that's not something that we can -- that we have a control on. That's not something that we can steer. So there, we have a neutral approach. But in the actuals, of course, that can have an impact. Olly Jeffery: And what was the impact of that in the '25 results from that movement at the end of Q4? Yannick Dekoninck: I think at the end of Q4, we had a net impact of EUR 22 million that was coming from this discounting of provisions. Stephanie Luyten: Thank you, Olly. If there are no further questions, let's wrap up today's presentation. First of all, a big thank you to all the teams who have contributed. Thank you, Bernard, Marco, Yannick. Marco Nix: Thank you, Stephanie. Stephanie Luyten: And thank you for joining us today. Have a nice day, and see you soon.
Eric Born: All right. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Grafton Full Year Results Presentation. A few operational highlights from me before I hand over to David, who will guide you through the financial numbers in more detail. Good morning. A resilient Group performance in 2025 with pleasingly a return to revenue and to profit growth. So revenue was up for the full year, 10.4%. Adjusted operating profit was up 7.1%, and our adjusted return on capital employed was up 60 basis points at 10.9%, comfortably exceeding our cost of capital. We made continued progress on our development activities to further strengthen the group, enhanced leadership teams and the talent pool in general across the Group, including bringing in -- for Iberia to really focus on our growth aspiration in that relatively new market for us. We successfully integrated the first platform acquisition we did, Salvador Escoda, which I'm pleased to say delivered the profit growth in line with our plan, and we made good work to prepare that business to be ready to accelerate growth going forward. We also strengthened our market position in the Republic of Ireland with the bolt-on acquisition of HSS Hire into the Chadwicks Group to further extend our hire proposition to our customers. And in general, we delivered a strong cash conversion and preserved a strong balance sheet to continue to support the future development of the Group. So I shall now hand over to David, who goes into more detail. David Arnold: Thank you, Eric, and good morning, everyone. As Eric has already covered off some of the headline details of our performance in 2025, I'll talk you through some of the financial details now starting with the income statement. Revenue of GBP 2.52 billion was 10.4% higher than last year. Thanks to the hard work of our teams across the group, we delivered a resilient adjusted operating margin pre-property profit of 7.3%, only 30 basis points below last year. This reflects a continued focus on margin management with the group achieving a 50 basis point improvement in gross margin, together with a proactive management of our cost base to mitigate the ongoing inflationary environment on operating costs. It's pleasing to report that we saw a return to profit growth for the first time in 3 years, with the group's adjusted operating profit before property profit of GBP 184.3 million, 6.2% ahead of 2024. Adjusted operating profit, including property profit of GBP 5.9 million was 7.1% up to GBP 190.2 million. The net finance cost of GBP 10.1 million was higher and reflected 3 elements: lower interest income on deposits following interest rate cuts, lower cash balances due to acquisitions and share buybacks; and finally, a foreign exchange movement. The effective tax rate was 18.2%. That's lower than the 19.5% indicated at the half year and reflected the geographic mix of group's profits and a credit relating to updated estimates of liabilities relating to prior years. Adjusted earnings per share was 75.4p, 5.1% higher than 2024 and which benefited from our share buyback program. Since we first started our share buybacks in 2022, we've reduced our share count by over 20%, and I'm delighted that we're announcing a new GBP 25 million share buyback today. For more technical guidance on 2026, I've included some information in the appendices, which you may find helpful. As noted in our January trading update, the Group has adopted a new reporting structure that better reflects our strategy and management focus. The Group is now organized into 4 geographical areas, the Island of Ireland, Great Britain, Northern Europe and Iberia. And I've set out on this slide where the various brands now sit. For clarity, all results presented today follow the new reporting structure with comparatives restated. And we've included a couple of slides again in the appendices to help you track through the new segments. Let's look now at movements in revenue for the year in comparison to 2024. The organic movement, which I'll cover in more detail on the next slide, saw revenue increase by GBP 30 million. Acquisitions contributed GBP 195 million of incremental revenue in total, largely due to the full year impact of Salvador Escoda, which reflects the benefit of an additional 10 months of trading compared to 2024. The divestment of the noncore MFP piping business in the Republic of Ireland at the end of May reduced revenue by GBP 5 million. As MFP mostly supplied internal customers, the revenue effect is limited here, but you'll see a larger impact later when we discuss the operating profit impact. Finally, the strengthening of the euro against sterling accounted for an exchange gain of GBP 18 million in the year. This slide analyzes the net increase of GBP 30 million in organic revenue. It should be noted that revenue in the year was supported by modest levels of product price inflation, and that's in contrast to 2024 when product price deflation, particularly in our distribution businesses in Ireland and Great Britain, adversely impacted sales. The Island of Ireland segment, where all businesses delivered year-on-year growth was a key driver of organic growth with revenue up GBP 34 million. In a difficult market, organic revenue in Great Britain was broadly flat year-on-year, which we felt was a creditable performance. Revenue in Northern Europe declined by GBP 6 million, largely due to lower trading activity in Finland. Organic growth in Iberia relates only to the last 2 months of the year as the business was acquired on the 30th of October 2024. Turning now to the movement in reported adjusted operating profit. We'll look at the movement in the profitability of the like-for-like business in a moment. The net impact of new and closed branches had a small positive impact on profits, while the impact of the MFP divestment, which I talked about earlier and is shown separately here, resulted in GBP 2.6 million reduction in profitability. Acquisitions added a total of GBP 13.2 million, mostly driven by Salvador Escoda in Spain with GBP 1.4 million coming from 7 months of trading from the bolt-on acquisition of HSS Hire Ireland. Property profit was up GBP 1.9 million in the year, while the stronger euro had a positive impact on reported sterling profitability. Looking at the movement in adjusted operating profit in our like-for-like business, you can see that all operating segments, except Northern Europe reported an increase in adjusted operating profit. Our businesses in the Island of Ireland delivered a strong profit growth as strong sales performance underpinned gross margin expansion. And in Great Britain, even in a very challenging market and with sales broadly flat, profits were higher, thanks to a 120 basis point improvement in gross margin. Northern Europe experienced a reduction in profits, driven by -- primarily by lower sales in Finland and ongoing operating cost pressures in both the Netherlands and Finland, which I'll cover in more detail in a few minutes. Finally, central costs were higher in the year, partly due to the planned investment made towards the end of 2024 and into 2025 to strengthen capabilities to support the group's strategic priorities. Moving on now to look at each segment in a little bit more detail. Our Island of Ireland segment delivered a strong performance during the year, supported by favorable economic conditions in the Republic of Ireland. Revenue of GBP 1.07 billion increased by 4.3% on a constant currency basis. Average daily like-for-like sales were up by 3.5%, with all businesses reporting year-on-year growth. Woodie's delivered another year of strong growth, supported by a particularly strong performance in plants and garden products with growth driven predominantly by increased transaction volumes alongside modest increases in average transaction values. Chadwicks saw good growth across the hardware, heating and plumbing categories. The gross margin increased by 20 basis points in the year, driven primarily by the strong performance of Chadwicks. Overheads increased due to inflationary pressure, while all our businesses continue to mitigate these impacts through productivity gains, better use of technology and more efficient rostering. Adjusted operating profit of GBP 111 million was 1.8% ahead on a constant currency basis, but the operating margin was slightly down by 20 basis points to 10.4%, largely due to operating cost pressures. The integration of HSS Hire Ireland into Chadwicks continues to progress well with a short-term focus on systems integration. The outlook for the construction market in Ireland remains positive with a focus on accelerating new housing supply expected to continue for at least the next decade. In Northern Ireland, market conditions were and remain more challenging with the construction sector delivering modest growth in 2025, primarily due to an increase in new housing, albeit from a low base. Moving next to the Great Britain. We were especially pleased that our targeted commercial actions delivered a 120 basis point improvement in the gross margin despite a very competitive market backdrop with subdued volumes. Around 60% of our sales in Great Britain are generated from London and the Southeast, and this market has been particularly affected by a weak housing market with London seeing the lowest level of housing starts in 40 years. After a positive start to the year, overall construction activity softened from late quarter 2 and remained that way into the second half with the U.K. government's autumn budget further weighing on consumer sentiment. Revenue in Great Britain of GBP 765 million was broadly unchanged in comparison to prior year. Average daily like-for-like sales were up 0.4% with strong growth in our manufacturing businesses, helped by softer comparators from 2024, largely offset by a modest decline in our distribution businesses, which represent a greater share of sales. Notwithstanding inflationary pressure on costs, especially with respect to labor and property, overheads were tightly controlled across our businesses with the increase in like-for-like overheads contained to 1.8%, well below general inflation levels. Adjusted operating profit of GBP 49.2 million increased by 6.2%, supported by that gross margin expansion. In our Northern Europe segment, performance in the year was below our expectations. Revenue of GBP 469.7 million declined by 1.1% on a constant currency basis. Average daily like-for-like sales increased -- decreased by 0.5% in 2025, with moderate growth in the Netherlands more than offset by a pronounced decline in Finland. Sales increased in the Netherlands, driven primarily by strong branch sales and growth in national key accounts, in addition to increases in project-related sales and modest product price inflation. After a strong start to the year, momentum in the Netherlands eased as several major construction projects reached completion and the start of new projects was delayed. Sales in Finland fell sharply due to difficult market conditions, unfavorably mild weather at the start of the year and temporary operational issues that disrupted our internal supply chain. Challenges have gradually eased in the second half as management took decisive actions. Gross margin increased by 90 basis points in the year, reflecting strong performances in both geographies. In the Netherlands, active commercial management actions more than offset the adverse mix effects of large construction projects and key accounts, which accounted for a higher proportion of sales, whilst gross margin in Finland improved primarily through optimization of rebates and procurement efficiencies. Overheads remained under pressure in the year, reflecting general inflationary pressures, the high settlement agreement under the industry-wide collective labor agreements in the Netherlands and strategic investments which we made to strengthen the Finnish business. Adjusted operating profit of GBP 29.6 million was 17.2% below prior year on a constant currency basis. The operating margin was 120 basis points lower at 6.3%, reflecting the impact of lower sales in Finland and the inflationary pressure on overheads across both geographies. Salvador Escoda is one of Spain's leading distributors of HVAC, water and renewable products, which we acquired at the end of October 2024. We're very pleased with how the integration of the business has progressed and its trading performance in its first full year under Grafton ownership was in line with our pre-acquisition expectations. We've strengthened the business further during 2025, adding resources and support to its experienced management team to create a strong foundation for Salvador Escoda to accelerate organic and inorganic growth in the coming years. Salvador Escoda reported revenue of GBP 212.9 million and delivered an adjusted operating profit of GBP 13.6 million, representing an adjusted operating profit margin of 6.4%. The year-on-year increase reflects the benefit of an additional 10 months of trading in 2025. On a pro forma basis, in comparison to prior year, average daily like-for-like revenue was 6.1% higher, driven by strong growth in the air conditioning, ventilation and refrigeration categories as well as favorable market backdrop. The Spanish economy continues to be one of the fastest-growing economies in Europe with GDP expected to have grown by approximately 3% in 2025. The Spanish construction market is forecast to grow slightly faster by around 3% to 4% in 2026, supported by sustained housing demand, substantial investment in renewable energy and transport infrastructure and the accelerating shift towards energy-efficient and sustainable building practices. Within the construction sector, the HVAC segment is well positioned for strong growth, driven by tighter energy efficiency rules, rising consumer focus on efficiency and higher temperatures across the Iberian Peninsula. Despite navigating significant change in 2025, the business delivered a strong trading performance, outperforming the prior year on both a reported and pro forma basis. The group continues to support the local management team in driving organic growth. New business -- new branches opened in Vic in Catalonia and Plasencia in Extremadura, enhancing our existing market positions in these regions. We continue to assess further growth opportunities in the attractive Iberian market with a strong pipeline of potential new branch locations in hand. Now this slide analyzes our cash flow in the year. As you can see, the group generated strong free cash flow of GBP 168 million in 2025, representing an 88% conversion of adjusted operating profit into cash and contributing to more than GBP 700 million of free cash flow generated over the last 4 years. And some key highlights to note. We were pleased to see a reduction in net working capital of GBP 12 million in the year despite higher sales. Optimizing our investment in net working capital, whilst not compromising our customer proposition continues to be a key focus across the group. We continue to reinvest to strengthen our businesses, notwithstanding current market weakness in certain geographies with a net GBP 41 million invested in replacement and development CapEx. There was a GBP 14.3 million investment in net M&A activity, being the acquisition of HSS Hire Island, partially offset by proceeds from the divestment of our MFP piping business in the Republic of Ireland. And finally, we returned GBP 128 million of capital, net of issued shares under the LTIP and SAYE schemes to shareholders in the year. Of that, GBP 72.6 million was paid in dividends. And you'll have seen from today's results that we propose to increase the full year dividend by 2% to 37.75p per share. Dividend cover for the year was 2x, and it is our intention to restore dividend cover more firmly within the 2 to 3x dividend cover ratio as we move forward. The cash-generative nature of businesses continues to support both shareholder returns and a strong balance sheet, providing significant firepower for the group to capitalize on organic and inorganic development opportunities. At the end of December, our net debt was GBP 123 million, representing a lease-adjusted net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of just under 0.4x, slightly better than at the end of 2024. And finally, just turning to the balance sheet. I'd just note the net working capital increase, which you see there of GBP 8.8 million in comparison to the end of 2024, and that's largely due to the recognition of the deferred consideration related to the divestment of MFP. Adjusted return on capital employed was 10.9%, almost 2 percentage points higher than our estimated weighted average cost of capital and 60 basis points higher than 2024. And I'll now hand back to Eric to talk about current trading trends, our strategy and outlook. Eric Born: Thank you, David. On the left, you can see the average daily like-for-like revenue change in constant currency for Q1 '25 and for the first couple of months in 2026. It's early in the year and the important trading months are still to come. So if you go to the Island of Ireland, wet weather impacted the trading on the Island of Ireland and in Great Britain. However, Ireland delivered some growth, supported by the softer comparators following the storm Eowyn in the prior year during that period. In GB, in Great Britain, the market environment remains challenging, as you can see on the like-for-like numbers. We had modest growth in Northern Europe with a strong Finnish performance, offset by some softer trading in the Netherlands, which was impacted by a change of holidays. In other words, they had the Carnival period in the like-for-like period, which will not deliver the sales you would hope during the period. But ongoing strong momentum in Iberia. From an outlook point of view, Island of Ireland, the construction outlook remains positive in the Island of Ireland with the retail consumer slightly more cautious than previously, but we have a positive outlook overall for the Island of Ireland. In terms of Northern Ireland, we don't expect any significant uplift during 2026. Moving to GB, a slow start, as I mentioned. However, the important months are yet to come and January, February was certainly impacted by bad weather conditions in Great Britain. We would expect a modest market growth in the second half of the year. Northern Europe, the Netherlands construction market is expected to gradually recover during the year. And in terms of Finland, we don't expect any meaningful improvement of the construction market until the second half of the year. Iberia, as David already mentioned, the construction market is expected to grow 3% to 4% during 2026, and we would expect our product segments to do well within that market environment. In terms of medium-term outlook, positive across all geographies because they all are supported by the structural growth drivers of not enough housing and aged housing stock. So the long-term drivers are very positive, and we have strong position in all of those markets. The recovery potential is especially great in Great Britain and Northern Europe, where we have a lot of operating leverage and the business has not cut into the muscle. So whilst we are lean in those businesses, we are ready to take advantage of increasing volumes when they will arrive. Tight cost control really gives us the benefit of the operating leverage as volumes return. So let me say a few words about our strategy. So how do we intend to drive growth and create value going forward. As you know, we focus on European markets with long-term growth characteristics. And within each geographic market, we build strong positions to distribute construction-related products and solutions to our predominantly trade customers. In terms of operating model, we have a federated operating model with local execution, supported by strong group capabilities, how we help the businesses to improve and drive results across the geographies. So what sets us apart are really strong and experienced leaders in each market supported by the group, but the accountability really sits in the market and the ownership. That drives very high colleague engagement and a relentless focus on providing customer service and a real sense of ownership. And I think that's something which really sets us apart because our businesses really care. We also have a very resilient model based on the geographic diversification we have. And you can see this again in this year's results where 2 of our markets are challenged, let's say, in 2 of our markets are in a more positive macro environment, which overall still leads to a very, very strong generative -- cash-generative business, which is a real underlying strength. And as David mentioned earlier, we are very disciplined in terms of our financial discipline. So we will maintain our credit grade rating, and we have a very clear structured approach to capital allocation, which you can see on the right of the slide. So it's really around, first, fund organic growth and keep our existing estate fresh and make sure we have sufficiently invested into the existing estate, pay a dividend in the range of a dividend cover of 2 to 3x with an ambition to move closer to 3x over time than we are at the moment. Third priority, inorganic growth. We have a very strong pipeline, and we are focused on driving growth at this moment in time in our already existing markets. So it's not about planting a flag in another country at this moment in time, focused on the existing markets and then to return surplus capital to our shareholders, which we did again with the announcement this morning of a further GBP 25 million share buyback. And I think the next slide nicely illustrates this in practice when you look around the capital allocation between 2022 and 2025. We started in '22 with a net cash position. We generated over GBP 700 million of free cash flow after replacement CapEx. We then allocated a good chunk, namely GBP 721 million to pay dividends and execute share buybacks and return that money to shareholders, whilst we also invested roughly GBP 100 million in development CapEx and over GBP 160 million in acquisitions. So I think that's a very nice illustration around the cash generation of the business and how we allocate the capital mindfully. But of course, we want to tell you more about all of that and how we drive future growth with a Capital Markets Event, which will be held on May 20 here in London. And the event will focus on the group's strategy and growth ambitions over the medium term and you will have the opportunity to not just meet David and me, but of course, many other senior leaders and see more about the bench strength of the management team we have from all the different geographies. So shall we move over to Q&A. Shane Carberry: Shane Carberry, Goodbody. Two, if I can, please. The first one, just in terms of the gross margin in the U.K., really impressive 120 bps increase year-over-year. Could you talk a little bit about the dynamics behind that and some of the levers that you had to pull to achieve that outturn? And then the second was just to get a little bit more color around Iberia. It's been kind of 14, 15 months now since you bought Salvador Escoda. So how has that process been? Has it integrated as well as you thought it would to date? And just thinking looking forward, now that you've hired a CEO, how should we think about how things are going to evolve from here from an organic and inorganic growth perspective relative to what you might have thought 14, 15 months ago? Eric Born: Okay. So let's start with GB and the margin improvement. I think in general, given we have, as you know, a federated structure, we have people in the businesses who are focused on the bottom line. This is a performance-led culture. And as -- for example, as demand was soft, we saw in some of the activities we did early in the year when we drove promotions that even with support of suppliers, the incremental volume you generate on the promotion activities actually led to a lower gross profit than in absolute pound sterling numbers than if you wouldn't have run a promotion. So the businesses will have been very tactical picking their battles, if you want, and more making sure we deliver an overall attractive basket for our customers rather than drive aggressive price promotions into a market where you will not have the incremental revenue and will be net-net out of pocket. So those were some of the levers. Of course, others were working hard on some of our exclusive and own brands and how are they positioned and what's the share of those and all sorts of commercial activities and collaboration with the suppliers to manage the gross margin overall. But I think that is really something where you have to be nimble and you have -- and I really attribute the strength of the federated structure and that operating model for the businesses to take the right decisions because it will be impossible for us to legislate if you want from a Group point of view, how they have to react to daily trading. So that's the bit on GB. If you look at Iberia, I think that has been a great success so far, right? So we have -- we are absolutely in line with where we expect to be. This is a business we acquired and in year 1 of acquisitions had a higher ROCE than our cost of capital. So we buy a platform which already in year 1, ROCE is greater than our cost of capital. So that's a good thing. Secondly, we had an experienced management team in a family setup, which had to learn a lot about how we do things in a PC environment. So we had to strengthen, for example, the finance function, the HR functions, the health and safety function, property, right? We have growth ambitions, but we wouldn't have had the infrastructure at the moment we acquired the business to accelerate growth beyond 2 or 3 branches a year, even if the opportunities come up, we just didn't have the infrastructure. Nobody have had the backbone and the infrastructure to absorb a bolt-on acquisition and integrate it, right? So that's really the work we have done during this year to create that, if you want the engine room within Salvador Escoda. And now we are ready to accelerate growth organically, but also to absorb bolt-on acquisitions as they might present themselves to execute. So that's within Salvador Escoda. So we strengthened the management team. We still have the same CEO or Managing Director for that operating business, which is Marta Escoda, the daughter of the founder, who already run the business when we bought it. The plan was always -- we singled out Spain or the European Peninsula as a very, very attractive market for 2 reasons. One, it's a growing market. Secondly, it's highly, highly fragmented, right? So it kind of really gives opportunities for M&A as well as organic growth across multiple verticals. So with Marta, we have an excellent person to run Salvador Escoda, but you need a different animal in the local geography to drive our growth ambitions, to help us to get the position we would want to have by 2030. So -- and that was the backdrop why very early on, we made the decision to go out and bring a CEO in for the Iberian Peninsula. And I'm very pleased, Mario has started in January. And I'm convinced we will have more to report over time from how we will successfully grow across Iberia. Charlie Campbell: Charlie Campbell from Stifel. A couple of questions following on from both of those really. So Spain margin 6.4% in the year. It was more like 7% before you bought it. I guess that comes from putting in more infrastructure to support the business and make growth more sustainable. But how should we think about margins longer term in Spain? Should we think about that 7% as achievable and perhaps more as volumes drop through? And secondly, on the GB and on the gross margin, did you change the incentive structure there at all? Are people perhaps more focused on growth than they were before because that really is an extraordinary performance. Eric Born: Look, in Iberia, we do believe there is room to enhance the margins in Salvador Escoda over time. But if I look at Iberia in general, we would expect for this business to substantially grow, so in Iberia and have somewhere a margin corridor between 7% and 10%, would be kind of the margin corridor we would expect to be throughout the cycle in Spain. So I hope that answers that bit. In terms of incentive structure, no, we haven't changed the incentive structure in the business in GB. We have enhanced the management capabilities within GB. So we have a long-serving colleague, which has kind of oversight over CPI, EuroMix and StairBox. And then we have Frank Elkins, who joined us in 2024, right? Time flies when you have fun, in 2024. And he has been really, really focused with the team and enhancing, as I said, the bench strength, which is an ongoing process, right? I always compare this to like a football coach that you -- whenever you have the opportunity, you strengthen your team. It's a team sport, right? And that's exactly what we have done. So the focus or the achievement has been by targeted activities and focus. But people are bonused on delivering the outcome on the bottom line, right? So in a sense, that incentive has always been there. So the incentive hasn't changed. David Arnold: And I suppose just on that financial piece around Spain, as Eric alluded to, the business is exceeding our cost of capital in its first full year and really very much return on capital employed is our sort of foremost guiding financial metric, I suppose. Operating margin is sort of -- is a good metric for quality. But really, it's about driving return on capital employed and cash. Samuel Cullen: Sam Cullen from Peel Hunt. I've got 3, if possible. Coming back on the Selco gross margins, I guess, how do you -- let's say, volumes do pick up second half of the year and they grow again next year. What's the sensitivity around kind of unwinding some of that gross margin increase to take more volume? And how do the guys on the ground judge if, when, how to do that? That's the first one. David Arnold: Should we just pick them off as we've got another couple coming. I mean, look, I think on gross margin, yes, you've got to play the game that's in front of you. And I think in 2025, it was a game of weaker margins. And therefore, what do we do focusing on that bottom line. And I think that mantra continues going forward. So we just need to be nimble and responsive to how the volume and the strength of the market demand sits overall in GB in the same way that we're not focused on market share as a particular metric and are led by what's the impact on the bottom line. I just think we'll be nimble and the gross margin may come down if we see that strength in volume that we know that we can more than recover that by seeding some margin. So it's that flexibility and nimbleness that we need really. Samuel Cullen: Second one is on central costs. I think you highlighted there was a step-up in investment this year. Do we expect that to be at the end of that step-up and it to be kind of inflationary from here? Or do you envisage... David Arnold: No, I think it's a modest amount. I mean, for example, to give a bit of color on some of the areas that we focused on, it was more support on transaction services so that, again, we were better placed to be able to pursue a broad pipeline of acquisitions. It was elements like cybersecurity and support for a number of the ERP implementations that we've got going on around the group. Some of it was bringing sensible things, for example, like payroll into the center and taking it out of the businesses and saving some of the costs in the businesses. So there were sort of a variety of tactical things. Do we think that there will be major moves or significant more increases in central costs? I don't think it will be significantly more in terms of the investment in additional functions or roles. Samuel Cullen: And the last one is back on the U.K. If we don't see a pickup in overall market volumes, do you see wider consolidation in the sector over the medium term, may not be from yourselves but from other players? Eric Born: It's a good question, right? So we have private equity active in the U.K., right? Do I think they -- if there is no recovery, that was your question, do I think there will be a lot of appetite of those ICs to invest more money in the sector? I'm not sure, right? In terms of the listed players -- in theory, there should be more consolidation. If you look at how many general builders merchants there are in the U.K., you would expect there to be more consolidation. Whether that will play out like that is yet to be seen, right? So we -- again, and I'm clear on that, we are -- from our own investment point of view, we believe in the businesses which we have in the U.K. irrespective of where we now sit in the cycle, and we will continue to support those businesses. And if the right organic growth locations come up, whether that's for a Selco or for TG Lynes or for a Leyland or anything, we will invest the money into it if we believe in the case. You have to look throughout the cycle. You can't just sit and think, now it's bad, it will always be bad because the fundamental growth drivers are there in the U.K. The question is when. But if you then come to M&A capital, do we deploy M&A capital in the U.K. Well, for GB, I'm not saying no. But as you will have seen, we look at capital allocation in a framework, which says, do we actually believe this is the right allocation of capital. Do we get a return on capital and the cash generation out of this business, which we think is really accretive for our shareholders and the business over time. And if the answer is, yes, we do and we find a market like that in GB, well, we will allocate capital. But if it's in Spain or in Ireland or somewhere else within our existing markets, we will allocate it. Florence O'Donoghue: Flor O'Donoghue, Davy. Just 2 for me. One is just on OpEx for this year, just your sense of rents, rates, labor, what they're looking like. Second one then is just on selling prices. What's the current state of play in relation to them? David Arnold: So I think on OpEx, I mean, if we look last year, there were a number of high areas of inflation. You take the Netherlands, for example, where there's a collective labor agreement, and we saw salary increases of 6% in 2025. That under the collective labor agreement for 2026 will be more like 4%. So we're definitely seeing it reduce. But I would still think that we'll be working really hard to contain it in that 3% to 3.5% level because of what we see in terms of some of the statutory increases, national insurance effectively for a full year. We've got what's happening on national living wage, for example, either in Ireland or in the U.K. Those pressures are still there. Pressures on property rents in terms of the inflation that we're seeing where you've got 5-year rents that are refixing this year that we've got the catch-up from a few years ago as well. So yes, we'll work really hard, but I would still say it still feels 3%, 3.5% we'll be doing well to contain it to that, I think. And we'll have to work really hard around efficiencies and cost control to mitigate some of the softness in the market. As regards overall, what we're sort of seeing across the piece on selling prices, I would say probably not a too dissimilar picture in '26 to what we saw in '25. Depending upon geography, Netherlands was probably closer to 1%. Ireland on the distribution side was more like 1.5% to 2%. I think we're still in that sort of zone, certainly talking to manufacturers and suppliers. It felt at the start of the year that we were in that sort of zone. Of course, we're slightly in the lap of the gods in terms of exactly what happens to the evolution of inflation in the year. But yes, we started thinking 1%, 1.5%. Christen Hjorth: Christen Hjorth from Deutsche Bank. Just 2 for me. First of all, on the GB like-for-like at the start of the year, just trying to unpick some of the one-offs in there and I suppose the extent to which the first 2 months is a read for the first half and maybe how you exited those first 2 months because obviously, the number was a bit standout on GB. And the second one, sort of maybe a bit similar to Sam's question, but looking at Europe, I mean, there's a few players out there looking to consolidate European distribution. So in the context of that, what really sets Grafton apart, particularly, I'd say, in terms of being the acquirer of choice for some of the businesses that you're looking for? David Arnold: Do you want to pick Europe and I'll come back to GB? Eric Born: Look, many of the consolidator -- not all of them, but many of the consolidators are across Europe are private equity backed, right? So if you look at what we bring to the table is we -- if you think about the family-owned business, we will be a home for the family-owned business and not a transitionary home for family-owned business. And I think that's a major competitive advantage we have. We can have owners talk to people who work for Grafton, who sold their business to Grafton and they can talk about how that experience was for them. And by the way, we do this frequently, right? We have people coming and visit Sitetech or other businesses and which are part of the Chadwicks Group now, and they can really talk about that firsthand experience. We also have that experience with Salvador Escoda, right? How was it for them. And I think that's a major, major benefit. What was the second part of the question? Christen Hjorth: GB like-for-like. David Arnold: Yes, GB like-for-like. I mean, look, the year has started off weakly. There's no doubt in GB. To some extent, it was -- has been influenced by the wet weather. But I think that's an element of it. I think market is -- remains tough at the moment. The good news is that the year is not won or lost in the months of January and February. So there's a lot to play for in the year ahead. There's some really great stuff that we're doing in the GB businesses. So I think confident about that. The underlying market, there's a lot of really good fundamentals that should start to see -- we should start to see some volume growth coming through during the course of this year. The biggest point is really around confidence. That's the thing. And over the last 5 days, that confidence has probably taken a bit of a not more generally. We just need to see how the next sort of few weeks pan out really. But I think if confidence can come back, there's a whole bunch of reasons to feel optimistic about volume growth, I think, in GB. Okay. So I think that looks like it from the room. We haven't got any questions online. Thank you very much, everybody. Enjoy the sunny day. Eric Born: Thank you all. David Arnold: Thanks.
Stella David: Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Entain's 2025 Results Presentation. I'm delighted to be here to present a strong set of results. I'm joined this morning on stage by Rob Wood, our CFO and Deputy CFO. And I also have members -- by the way, can you hear me? Good, good. Okay. Always helps in a presentation to be heard, I think. Anyway, I'm also joined by the IR team here in the audience. We also have senior members of the executive team in the audience as well. And we have our new CFO designate, Michael Snape, who's in the front row as well. So welcome to everybody. And now on to the agenda. I'm going to start with the headlines and some of the highlights of our strong progress. After that, Rob will then take you through the financials and provide you with the guidelines for 2026. And then it's going to be back to me to discuss our strategic delivery, how our priorities are evolving to further accelerate our performance and why we have confidence in our pathway to earnings growth, margin expansion and cash generation, including our conviction that we are going to hit at least GBP 500 million of annual adjusted cash flow from 2028. And then finally, I will briefly wrap up before we open everything to your questions. But before I actually do move on to 2025 financial performance, this is the first time that I have spoken publicly since the U.K. budget back in November. The U.K. government's decision to dramatically increase taxes on the gambling sector was extremely disappointing. It opens the door to the illegal black market who pay no tax, do not have a license and offer no player protections. However, during this period of turmoil, we will invest wisely in the U.K., and we will seize the opportunity to gain share from the long tail of subscale operators who, quite frankly, are ill-equipped to withstand this impact. Okay. Now turning to our results. 2025 has been a good year for the group. We delivered against our strategic priorities and achieved a strong financial performance with EBITDA for both Entain and BetMGM ahead of expectations. Importantly, growth was broad-based and underpinned by strong volume growth, which demonstrates the underlying health of the business. Online volumes were up 7% year-on-year in 2025. And impressively, it was up 9% in Q4. Throughout 2025, online business consistently delivered growth, and we now have 7 consecutive quarters of revenue growth online, and that is despite starting to lap some tough comps. The U.K. continues to be a standout performance, but also there are markets like Spain, Canada, Greece, Georgia, New Zealand, all showing strong double-digit growth. And our joint venture, BetMGM, produced an excellent year of strong and profitable growth. We also enjoyed efficiency improvements. Entain's EBITDA was up 8% year-on-year to GBP 1.16 billion. And including our share of BetMGM, EBITDA was up an impressive 28% to GBP 1.244 billion. The EBITDA outperformance is stronger than expected and -- the EBITDA performance and the stronger-than-expected cash return from BetMGM has driven a meaningful improvement in our adjusted cash flow, again, ahead of expectations. So our improvement journey is working and it is delivering. Our diversified portfolio of podium positions provides resilience and scale advantages that matter more than ever now. Building on this momentum, we have evolved our strategic priorities to further optimize how we work, enhance profitability, drive meaningful cash generation. So in summary, 2025 has been a strong year. The business is in good shape, and we're confident in our ability to not only navigate the challenges, but to emerge stronger. And with that, I'll temporarily hand over to Rob. Rob Wood: Thanks, Stella. Good morning, everyone. So for the eighth and final time, I'm delighted to be delivering the full year results presentation, and it's a pleasure to present strong numbers again before I hand over the baton to Mike. It's a familiar format for me this morning, so let me jump straight in. And as usual, all revenue and EBITDA growth numbers that I quote are in constant currency unless stated otherwise. So starting with revenue, and I'm really pleased with the growth we delivered across the whole group. Total revenue, including 50% of BetMGM, was up by nearly GBP 0.5 billion to GBP 6.4 billion or up 8% year-on-year. Within that, online NGR ex U.S. was up -- was GBP 3.9 billion, up 6% year-on-year. And barring adverse sports results in Q4, that growth number would have been 7%, in line with volume growth for the year. On to EBITDA, which came in ahead of expectations for both BetMGM and Entain. Ex U.S. EBITDA of GBP 1.16 billion beat our guidance and was up 8% year-on-year despite digesting new taxes from Brazil following their new regulatory regime. Online EBITDA margin also beat guidance, and I'm delighted to say it was up 0.4 percentage points year-on-year despite a 1.4 percentage point drag from Brazil taxes. So that means that our scaled growth and improving operational execution drove an underlying 1.8 percentage point margin improvement, which is a key highlight of the year. So with EBITDA beats from both Entain and BetMGM, total group EBITDA was GBP 1.24 billion, which was up a very strong 28% on the prior year. And that EBITDA growth led to equally impressive EPS growth, which more than doubled to 62p. Moving on to adjusted cash flow, which is a key measure for us, and I'm delighted to report a strong year-on-year improvement from an outflow in 2024 to an inflow of GBP 151 million in 2025. GBP 151 million is comfortably ahead of expectations and was driven by both the Entain EBITDA beats and higher-than-expected cash from BetMGM. On to dividends, we've declared a final dividend of 9.8p per share, up 5% year-on-year, which is consistent with the half year and our progressive dividend policy. Finally, leverage. We've added a look-through leverage metric, which better reflects the group's leverage position. What do we mean by look-through? On the debt side of the equation, we include the outstanding DPA payments and the balance sheet value of the CEE minority. And on the EBITDA side, we include our 50% share of BetMGM. And as the slide shows, look-through leverage at year-end was 3.6x, which is down significantly from 4.3x at the end of 2024 due to both EBITDA growth, but also paying down the DPA. On a reported basis, leverage has come in at 3.1x, flat year-on-year as expected, and available cash remains strong at over GBP 900 million. Let's turn now to our online revenue performance ex U.S. over recent quarters. And this chart shows 2 lines: one for NGR growth, which includes volatility from sports margin and one for volume growth, which adjusts NGR to remove any impact from sports margin and is therefore a clear measure of underlying growth. Two particularly satisfying callouts. Firstly, we've now delivered 7 consecutive quarters of growth, all on an organic basis, evidencing the structural growth in our business model. And secondly, we maintained strong volume growth into the second half of the year despite lapping the voluntary code in the U.K. in the summer. No doubt there'll be some recycling benefit to volumes in H2, given margin was below expectation in both Q3 and Q4, but volumes were consistently strong and grew 7% across the year. So that means we're growing at least in line with our markets, and we enter 2026 with continued momentum. Now for the eagle eyed amongst you, you'll note this chart is not quite the same as we've shown previously. The prior version normalized for Euro 2024 and it adjusted the current year margin to a normalized margin, meaning that volatility from the prior year margin still impacts the picture, but that version is included in the appendix. Now to our usual market breakdown. And again, it's a strong picture with growth coming from across the portfolio. Our largest market, UK&I, continues to be a standout performer, delivering growth of 15% in online, well in excess of market growth as we continue to regain market share. We also saw sustained double-digit volume growth in the U.K. throughout every quarter of 2025. And U.K. Retail also saw market share gains as we were flat like-for-like across the year in a market which declined by mid-single digits. International online NGR grew 2%, slightly behind volume growth of 4% due to soft margins, especially in Brazil and also Australia. Importantly, the second half saw an acceleration in volumes from 1% in H1 to 7% in H2, helped by lapping the regulatory changes in 2024 from Belgium and Netherlands. If we look now by market within international, Brazil had a tough sport margin in H2, falling 3 percentage points year-on-year. So consequently, NGR declined in H2 and brought growth for the year down to flat. However, on the plus side, volumes were up 13% over the year. Market share was maintained over H2, so we know other operators were hit by a poor margin, too. And we delivered a positive contribution to EBITDA despite the new regulation and high competition. Australia next, where customer-friendly results at several tentpole events suppressed NGR, particularly in the second half of the year. Volume growth fared better with 3% growth in H2 as our refreshed management team have been a catalyst for improving performance and improving profitability. Italy online was up 5%, growing NGR consistently by mid-single digits in every quarter of the year. And Italy retail also fared well with 7% NGR growth over the year. Other large markets in International continued to see double-digit growth, including New Zealand, Georgia and Spain on this page, but also Canada, Greece and parts of the Baltics and Nordics as well. CEE next and both Croatia and Poland delivered growth in both NGR and EBITDA and retained their market leadership positions in those markets. And finally, BetMGM also reported an outstanding performance with 34% growth in online revenue. The key takeaway from this slide should be the unrivaled broad-based growth that Entain enjoys across the diversified portfolio. Looking forward, we're targeting growth across every one of these online markets in 2026, which positions us very well for '26 and beyond. Moving on now to EBITDA, which came in ahead of expectations for both Entain and BetMGM. This slide shows our year-on-year bridge with EBITDA excluding BetMGM on the left and then EBITDA including BetMGM on the right. Starting on the left, Entain's EBITDA grew 7% or up GBP 71 million on a reported basis, that 7% becomes 8% on a constant currency basis, and it would be 14% excluding the new Brazil taxes. As usual, as the left-hand side chart shows, our online business is the main growth engine, adding GBP 136 million year-on-year. Where did that come from? Three things. Firstly, NGR growth, as we've looked at on the prior slides. Two, efficiency savings, particularly within cost of sales as our online gross profit margin increased a whole percentage point before Brazil tax. And thirdly, improved marketing returns, enabling us to hold spend broadly flat year-on-year in absolute terms, thereby improving margin. Retail now, and we saw EBITDA up GBP 16 million year-on-year, helped by a favorable margin versus our expectations. Then in addition to Entain's GBP 71 million year-on-year increase from the left-hand side, the right-hand chart adds our share of BetMGM's significant EBITDA improvement of GBP 178 million year-on-year as it inflected to profitability, which gives an all-in total group EBITDA of GBP 1.244 billion, up almost GBP 250 million year-on-year. That's an impressive 25% growth on a reported basis and a touch higher at 28% in constant currency, and that's all organic growth. And as I mentioned earlier, that EBITDA growth is the primary driver of why EPS more than doubled last year. Let's now take a closer look at cash flow and leverage. And as always, there's a detailed cash flow provided in the appendix. As a reminder, adjusted cash flow is effectively our distributable cash, i.e., cash flow pre-equity dividends, and we also exclude working capital noise and strip out M&A and debt movements. In 2025, we delivered adjusted cash flow of GBP 151 million, which is meaningfully ahead of expectations. You'll remember a year ago, I had guided adjusted cash flow to be broadly neutral. And then by Q3, we were ahead of plan, particularly thanks to BetMGM. And so guidance effectively moved from neutral to GBP 75 million, and then we beat that too. So what drove the outperformance? Firstly, Entain's EBITDA beat guidance. And secondly, BetMGM returned more cash to parents than guided, $270 million in total for 2025, which far exceeded expectation. And finally, a net favorable movement across other cash items, including lower interest costs following our debt refinancing efforts last year. Net debt ended the year at GBP 3.6 billion, with the improvement in adjusted cash flow offset by an FX translation bad guy of over GBP 100 million and the working capital outflow that was as expected. So overall, reported leverage of 3.1x is in line with where we expected it to be, but more insightfully, look-through leverage of 3.6x saw a meaningful improvement, down from 4.3x in the prior year, reflecting EBITDA growth, improved cash flow and a reduction in the remaining DPA balance. So our cash flow and look-through leverage improved significantly. Our available cash remains strong at over GBP 900 million, and we have a healthy debt maturity profile with our next significant maturity of around 20% of the debt not falling due until 2028. A few quick comments on BetMGM now. It won't be new news, but it's still important given its significance to the group's priorities, particularly cash generation. BetMGM had a fantastic year and delivered ahead of its upgraded expectations with total revenues up 33% and EBITDA up over $460 million year-on-year as it moved into profitability. This inflection triggered the start of cash returns to parents with $270 million distributed in 2025, including excess cash from the 2024 year-end. The strong performance last year was driven by BetMGM's disciplined execution, underpinned by a leading iGaming offering and BetMGM remains on track to deliver approximately $500 million of adjusted EBITDA in 2027. Since we created BetMGM around 8 years ago, total net investment between parents now sits at almost exactly $1 billion. So with approximately $500 million of EBITDA next year, it's easy to see that the ROI on that investment has been excellent. Now last slide from me, the outlook for 2026. And remember, the appendix includes a detailed guidance slide for modeling purposes as well as a slide on the BetMGM parent fee mechanics. To be consistent with prior years, when I refer to Entain EBITDA, this is before parent fee income, which does start in 2026. So for 2026, we expect online NGR growth of 5% to 7% on a constant currency basis with broad-based growth across the portfolio. Online EBITDA margin is expected to drop to 23% to 24% in 2026 following the increase in U.K. gaming taxes, including our expectation of mitigating approximately 25% of that cost in 2026. Stella will talk about it more shortly, but our upgraded mitigation expectation today is to improve cost mitigation to over 50% of the U.K. tax impact from 2027 onwards. The efficiency plans, which Stella will take you through, will support an upward trajectory for both EBITDA and EBITDA margin from 2027. So with 5% to 7% online NGR growth and 23% to 24% online EBITDA margin, we're comfortable with current market expectations for 2026 Entain EBITDA, which represents a small decline year-on-year. However, when combined with growth in the U.S., EBITDA, including the U.S., will be broadly stable year-on-year. And broadly stable, of course, represents significant underlying growth before absorbing the U.K. gambling tax rises. Another consequence of the U.K. tax rise is that we lose a year on a deleveraging profile because now look-through leverage will be broadly stable in 2026 before resuming deleveraging thereafter. Two more bits of guidance to touch on. Firstly, marketing phasing because 2026 is a World Cup year, we expect approximately 55% of marketing spend to be in the first half, consistent with previous tournament years. And then secondly, now that BetMGM is sustainably profitable, our ETR guidance going forward is on an including U.S. basis. And the new ETR, so effective tax rate, the new number is 30%. This is higher than 2025 due to the U.K. tax increase as we'll now have less profits in the U.K., which are taxed at a below average ETR. And so that adverse change in geographical mix pushes up the group's blended ETR. In addition, there's a slide in the appendix, which takes you through expected tax accounting treatment of our share of the $1 billion of available brought forward losses in BetMGM. In short, a deferred tax asset is expected to be recognized in 2026, which will give a boost to EPS in 2026, but then available losses are no longer benefiting EPS in the following 2 to 3 years. Cash tax is not impacted. So in summary from my section, we expect 2026 total group EBITDA, including BetMGM, to be stable year-on-year despite digesting the significant increase in U.K. taxes. How do we achieve that? We operate in growth markets where we have the most diverse set of podium positions globally. So we have structural sustained growth built into our model. We also have a gaming-led business in the U.S. without material exposure to prediction markets. So those combined give us confidence that underlying growth will continue into 2026 and beyond. And on a final note, I'm proud to say that our EBITDA of just under GBP 1.25 billion is now twice the size of the first EBITDA number that I reported 7 years ago and is many multiples bigger than my early days at Gala Coral. It's been quite a journey. It's been hugely eventful. It's been highly rewarding, and I'm delighted to be leaving the business with great momentum across an outstanding global footprint, yet still with so many growth opportunities ahead. And it's also clear that in Mike, we have -- I'll be handing over the CFO reins to a hugely capable replacement. With that, I'll hand back to Stella. Stella David: Thank you, Rob. It's difficult to beat that because he's got all the numbers, and I've got all the fluffy stuff. So -- and this is the audience for fluffy stuff. You like numbers. So I'll do my best, okay? So look, Entain in 2025 did deliver strategically and financially. So that is a really good starting point. But now our priorities have to evolve because we have to reflect the next stage in our journey, and it's an improvement journey. And we have to build on some of those achievements, but we also have to be bolder in our mindsets. We have to address the significant challenges from the dramatic tax increases in the U.K. So what are we doing about it? Well, we're intensifying our focus on cash generation and disciplined capital allocation. And importantly, today, we reiterated our confidence in delivering at least GBP 500 million in annual adjusted cash flow from 2028. Cash generation being a key component of long-term value creation. And as you can see from this slide -- yes, good, you see from this slide, it is now an explicit strategic priority, called out in our bonusing for our people, called out in our long-term incentive plans, it's a very important part of where we're trying to go. But before discussing our achievements and progress during '25 in detail, these next 2 slides are an important reminder of Entain's foundations. We are a global leader in an industry that is in long-term growth, and we are well positioned. This slide is a powerful visual representation of the breadth and the quality of our business. In Entain's 16 largest online markets, we have a podium position in 13 of them. And we're in the top 4 in all 16. And excitingly, many of these positions have the opportunity for significant growth. So for example, if you take New Zealand, where we are the partner with the New Zealand government for sports betting. We now have a great opportunity in iGaming when it becomes regulated at the end of '26 beginning of '27. And in Spain, we have a great revitalization of our beautiful bwin brand. And we're really hopeful that by the end of 2026, it will also have a podium position. And this next slide is also going to be familiar. I'm a bit boring. I keep showing the same slides, but that's consistency for you. Consistency is good. The left-hand bar chart shows that over 98% of our NGR is locally licensed. And 97% of our online revenue is from markets estimated to grow at least by mid-single-digit CAGR. That is a truly impressive statistic, 97% of revenue coming from markets in good, sustained long-term growth. And the pie charts on the right showcase the diversity of the portfolio by both geography and by product. And it's the combination of all of these things that gives our business the resilience that it needs, underpinning our ability to deliver long-term shareholder value. And now I'm going to share a few of the highlights from across our portfolio in 2025. In the U.K., one of our many initiatives was refining our bonusing, using real-time player data to increase segmentation, reduce bonusing as a percentage of GGR while increasing player value. This bonus optimization on our central platform is also driving benefits in markets like Brazil, Spain, Portugal and Canada. Our U.K. retail team continued to raise the bar with a state-wide rollout of our group bet stations. And this has driven an increase in our market share as well as an increase in our Bet Builder staking. In Australia, our new leadership team adopted a disciplined and returns-led approach, retiring some of the inefficient legacy marketing initiatives whilst also leaning into AI to produce high-quality creative assets more quickly and at a fraction of the cost. Across the group, we've also reduced nonworking marketing spend, centralized performance marketing and improved our allocation of investment. Our strong performance in Spain reflects that reawakening of the bwin brand and also markets like Canada, Brazil, Georgia, all benefiting from refining how our brands engage with our customers. And also some things on product and tech. In Poland, STS migrated onto our Croatia Sportsbook, rebuilt its mobile app and now has a slicker, faster user experience. And in Brazil, we launched Sporting bot for the Club World Cup, an AI personalized assistance to help our customers enjoy the product more. And it's proved to be such a success that it's being rolled out across more markets and more sports this year. So that's just a flavor of the strategy in action. We're seeing improvements to the portfolio because we have shared learnings that generate a powerful multiplier effect, supporting our momentum and our operational efficiency. Moving on now to customer acquisition and retention. And again, this slide will be familiar. Net revenue retention is holding strong. It's above the 85% benchmark, and it has been north of 90% for the entirety of 2025. And this reflects the work that has been done to close product gaps and improve our customer journeys. You'll see there's a slight drop-off in Q4, but that is due to customer-friendly sports results, and it's nothing structural. Customer acquisition also remains comfortably above the 15% level. So if you get the combination of strong net revenue retention and healthy acquisition, that underpins our sustainable growth. And these metrics remain strong as we enter into 2026. As I mentioned with our strategic priorities, Entain is now in the next phase of its improvement journey to accelerate forward. Project Romer delivered over GBP 100 million in savings annually. But we can and we have to do more by continuing to improve on our cost of sales, by optimizing marketing rates as a percentage of NGR and a continued focus on operating efficiencies. We already have multiple work streams identified to deliver against these 3 key levers. And we're also excited by the opportunities that our continued AI enablement program will have for improving the customer experience, the colleague experience and importantly, for increasing our bandwidth, whether that's resolving legacy issues with old -- can't say that, old code. You know what I mean. I hope you know what I mean. Speeding up development cycles to improve the user experience, improving our customer care handling, automating low-quality contracts and legal work or dramatically cutting the cost of asset generation in our marketing areas. So delivery of these type of group-wide initiatives support our expectations to now offset over 50% of the U.K. tax increases from 2027, up from our previous estimate of 25%. I just want to do a slight call out on that. When the tax rates went up, we said immediately, we would mitigate 25%. That was the right thing to say because we haven't done the work at that stage. You need to take the time to add up the numbers and go through the figures to have the confidence. So we didn't come out of the block shouting it's going to be 50% or 60% because that would have been quite frankly, a made-up number. Now we've done the work, and we've got increasing confidence in our ability to deliver against that. And that is the right way to do these things, engage into the business, build the confidence and start to solidify those initiatives. So I just wanted to give that flavor. We're not being dramatic and changing our minds. We're just building on what we started to do immediately after the tax increases, really important points. So let's bring this all together. Despite the jump in those taxes in the U.K., we now remain comfortable with the market expectations for 2026. And when you combine BetMGM and Entain, that means we are delivering a stable set of numbers in '26 versus '25. From '27 onwards, organic growth and those optimization initiatives means that we're going to grow both EBITDA and cash flow and both on a year-on-year basis and importantly, versus 2025. And by 2028, we've got the building blocks in place to achieve at least GBP 500 million in annual adjusted cash flow. And therefore, that will support our journey to getting our leverage back to our target range of 2 to 3x. So let me briefly wrap up before we go into Q&A. 2025 was definitely a strong year. We delivered growth across the portfolio, and that is a highly attractive portfolio that is well diversified. And our relative scale means that we will be winners in the U.K. because we will gain meaningful share from the regulated market. So execution is definitely improving. There's definitely a lot more to do. There always is. That's how you keep being competitive. And we have a clear pathway ahead. So we are confident in it. We are getting more disciplined, and we are accelerating forward. And on that note, I would like to open the floor to your questions, and I will return back over here. Operator: [Operator Instructions]. Monique Pollard: It's Monique Pollard here from Citi. So 2 questions from me. Firstly, on the UK&I, obviously, you've delivered a pretty amazing performance today. You're now materially outperforming, let's say, your main competitor and largest competitor in the market, both on iGaming and sports and even including the comp, so on a 2-year stack, outperforming on both those metrics and taking material market share. Just wanted to get a sense from you of whether you think that can continue as we go into 2026, given some of the initiatives that you've taken on. Second question I had was when we think about the Q4 win margin and that was down 1.4 percentage points in the fourth quarter online sports margin and year-on-year. But obviously, the online EBITDA has come in really good. So what are the sort of measures you've taken to protect that online EBITDA margin despite the unfavorable sports results in the quarter? Stella David: Okay. Great. Well, I think that's 2 questions. So I'll answer one, and Rob will answer the other one. Which one should I do? Okay. I'll take the U.K. and Ireland one because it's been great actually, the revitalization that we've seen in the U.K. And I actually have the U.K. team here. So they are in the audience, so I have to be nice to them. But they genuinely have done a great job. We've done lots of things, improved customer journeys, innovated, more innovation yet to come. We're putting a whole new Ladbrokes experience together before the start of the World Cup. We innovated with the first Bet Builder in horse racing. So there's a lot of focus and there's a lot of energy. And it's energy is really important in these journeys, that belief and that willing to lean in and get it done. So we think there are lots of opportunities, both online where we definitely think we will win share once the new taxes come in place. But let's not forget, we have the best retail estate in the U.K. It's 2,400 shops, great shop colleagues. You would be amazed about their motivation. When we do our global employment engagement survey, they score amazingly. And you think about -- they're not high paid people, but their motivation and their customer care is just outstanding. And those things make a difference to how you perform and how you are relative winners in a marketplace that is going through change. So we're very optimistic. And I can say this because it's true, the U.K. has got off to a great start in 2026. Rob Wood: And then on to the online question. So yes, as you say, win margins below expectations. So in the end, NGR only plus 3%, but volumes plus 9%. How did we still get there on the EBITDA delivery? The main answer is within that gross profit margin point that I made earlier. We've seen great success, particularly this year sort of the continuation of Project Romer. Hugo sat in front of me, his team working on things like payment service providers where we've generated material savings. I referenced it earlier, if you take out Brazil tax, gross profit margin was up about a percentage point. And actually, there were some other tax rises at Netherlands and others that meant that it was even more on an underlying basis. So 1 point across the whole online revenue base, that's GBP 40 million, and actually, it's more like GBP 50 million, GBP 60 million. So that's the primary answer. It wasn't marketing. We spent exactly as we intended to in the second half of the year. We spent GBP 20 million more than we did in the first half, which is what we guided to last summer. So it's really the cost of sales margin or gross profit margin that delivered the catch-up against the NGR miss. Benjamin Shelley: It's Ben Shelley from UBS. Two for me, if I may. One, could you talk about the growth outlook for the U.K. iGaming business, specifically amid the tax changes in that market? And then secondly, on New Zealand, can we expand a bit more on that opportunity? I appreciate it's very early, but what kind of upside do you think that can present to medium-term revenue guidance? Stella David: Okay. Well, we'll try and do them sort of -- I say a bit, you say a bit. Rob Wood: Okay. Stella David: So growth in iGaming, I mean, clearly, there is a market share opportunity here when the taxes go up. If you look at the shape of the business, the bottom 25% share of the iGaming market is through competitors, which are very subscale, 1% percentage share -- 1% share of the market. And they're just ill-equipped to ride the storm with this. So we feel very confident that we will gain share during that journey of the regulated market. Clearly, the black market is going to grow. At the moment, there aren't enough barriers in the way of the black market. And there are still 4 black market operators advertising on the front of football shirts on the Premier League. I spent a letter expressing my concern about that. There is a consultation that's taking place with government. But quite frankly, that should be dealt with now because for all the reasons, the level of interest in the black market is going to go up. But we are in a very strong position. We're very strong in gaming. We have the scale to significantly increase share, which I think we will do. And we factored that partly into our numbers. Anything else on the U.K. before I go into New Zealand? Rob Wood: I mean we also extended the coin economies to Gala and Foxy. So it's not just about Ladbrokes and Coral driving growth in gaming in the U.K. So those brands are responding well, too. Stella David: Yes, that's great. And then on to New Zealand, just as a kind of a bit of background for everybody in case everybody isn't fully up to speed. We are the partner of government in New Zealand. We are the only licensed sports betting operator, and we have that long-term license agreement. Going forward, towards the end of '26, maybe the beginning of '27, there will be licensed operators for iGaming. They're going to be giving out 15 licenses. We are confident that we'll probably get 3 of those licenses. And I think the opportunity for us is significant because we'll be the only player who will be able to do cross-sell, yes. And so therefore, it's too early to say. We haven't explicitly factored it into our numbers, but we have put it forward as one of those opportunity areas that could be significant for us as we go forward. So really exciting. And what's great about the team over in Australia and New Zealand under the leadership of Andrew Boris is they're really leaning into this that they're working very closely with our partners over there. We have 2 brands. Actually, we do under our licensing agreement. We have the TAB brand, but we also have betcha. Betcha is more focused on sports in general, whereas the TAB brand is more focused on horse racing. So we have lots of opportunities going forward. Rob Wood: And maybe put some numbers on it. Andrew probably won't appreciate this, but the opportunity is big. And we estimate that there's around a GBP 600 million marketplace. And currently, we're less than GBP 200 million. So if we have all of sports and a reasonable share of gaming, why can't that below GBP 200 million number go to, say, GBP 300 million. So an opportunity for significant growth over a number of years. Estelle Weingrod: Estelle Weingrod from JPMorgan. I've got 2 questions as well. The first one on your online organic growth revenue guidance. Could you perhaps provide more granularity, more color on the different geographies, what you're baking in like between U.K. and IAC and international? And the second one on the Netherlands. I know it's a small market for you now. But just to understand a bit better how is your -- how was the exit rate and maybe what you're seeing right now in the market because you -- I think you're now lapping some of the affordability check comps that were implemented last year in February. Just to see if you're seeing an inflection in the market now. Stella David: You go and then I'll chip in. Rob Wood: Okay. We'll do it the other way around. So first question, the 5% to 7% guidance, where does it come from? I mean, unusually, I think it's going to be pretty uniform across our segments. So I mentioned it earlier, but international, for example, was below in 2025, but it had the drag from Netherlands and Belgium. I'll come back to Netherlands. So that's now washed through and it exited with 7% volume growth in the second half of the year. And U.K. incredible in '25 with 15% growth. Of course, it won't be 15% in 2026. And so I'd expect those segments to be much more uniform. Plus I mentioned earlier, if you look at the negatives, I'll come back to Netherlands in a moment. But Australia, we do expect Australia to return to growth in '26. And Brazil, when we annualize against those poor margins in the second half of the year, you'd expect growth in Brazil as well. So I think you'll see a more uniform picture. And then the second part of the question, Netherlands. So as at Q3, we were minus 30% at the end of Q3. Then Q4, I think I'm right saying was minus 2%, so you can see a massive difference in performance. So the objective now is to get back into a little bit of growth. But even if we don't, the key thing is we've washed out that minus 30% that we were carrying for 4 quarters. Stella David: Yes. And just one thing to add on Netherlands. It's a kind of -- it's a terrible combination as a market because not only have the gambling taxes gone up significantly, but there's huge amounts of friction for players with very low thresholds in terms of deposit limits, et cetera. And I think I'm right that there's just another tweak up that's going to go on in duty rates, I think from January. Is that right? Yes. I think it's going from 34% to 37.5%, which is, again, a little bit more friction for players there. Richard Stuber: Richard Stuber from Deutsche Bank. Can I ask just a couple of questions on the optimization plan. You talked about it's going to be effective from 2027. I was just wondering whether there are any opportunities to accelerate that? Why don't you sort of start those plans now? And the second question on that as well is, I guess, the initial guidance you gave in terms of U.K. tax mitigation was looking at the U.K. market. So how much of the optimization plan do you think is related to the U.K. and how much is sort of more of a global initiatives? Stella David: Thanks very much. I'll take the first, you take the second. Rob Wood: Yes. Stella David: So I hope I haven't miscommunicated. Optimization plans take place every single day. So it's an ongoing journey. And I think the way that I would describe it is prior to the U.K. taxes going up, we had areas that we were continually thinking about what are the next areas we can improve, whether that's payment service providers, whether it's automation, removing the processes, whether it's using AI to cut down our marketing production costs. So it's an ongoing journey. And if you think about the hit in 2026, we take the big hit from gaming, which is the big increase from 21% to 40% bang first of April. And so without mitigation, we'd obviously have a lower run rate. So we are mitigating and optimizing in 2026 to get to the numbers we have. But some of these other initiatives, they organically happen sequentially over time. And so it will continue to build as we go forward. So it isn't a wait and see. I think everybody is very active in the company looking for those improvements in run rate that come from multiple activities. There isn't one big silver bullet. And I think if I were you, I'd be horrified if there was a silver bullet because why haven't we shot it. So therefore, it is literally multiple activities that go into how we improve the customer experience, how we improve the colleague experience, so we get more efficiency out of them, how we generally cut costs using the tools that are available to us and how we use AI, which is a huge game changer if it's done in the right way, to increase our bandwidth and our capability. A lot of people say AI is about this or that. AI is about enabling us to do more with the resources that we have to help protect us in the future. Rob Wood: And perhaps the only thing I'd add from a modeling perspective, put it through in '27. We're happy with where the market sits for '26 as it stands. And in terms of where is it coming from, where is that initial 25% that we announced last November, that was U.K. focused. The second 25% is a global view for all the reasons Stella has just said, primarily all online, but you can assume it's uniform or proportionate with the segments. There will be a little bit of corporate benefit as well, but the lion's share would be online across all the segments. I think that was the question. Adrien de Saint Hilaire: Adrien de Saint Hilaire from Bank of America, please. A couple of questions. First of all, can you talk about the risk in your view of prediction market platforms coming into your markets and I say your markets beyond the U.S., obviously. And then, Rob, maybe an easy one as the last question. I can see your cash flow Slide 21. You have it down in '26, and I'm not too sure why because you've got stable EBITDA, declining CapEx, declining interest and so on and so forth. So what's the moving part? Stella David: Okay. I'll take the first question on prediction markets outside the U.S. I might even comment on it in the U.S. as well. So in the U.S., there is a unique set of circumstances. It doesn't get taxed like sports betting, and it is not approved by the state regulators. which means that there is a huge amount of prediction markets goes through nonregulated states, particularly California and Texas. I think the percentage going through those 2 states is it's -- I don't know, it's something like 80% of the total volume. There's also a huge amount of play of underage players. So in the U.S., you're going to be 21 to play. So 18- to 21-year olds are playing prediction markets, and they're playing prediction markets in non Luno regulated states. It doesn't touch us that much in the U.S. because we are very much stronger in iGaming, and we never had a business to protect in those nonregulated states. So it is a bit of an anomaly in the U.S. And let me be clear. When people play the prediction markets in sports, it looks like a sports bet, it sounds like a sports bet, and it acts like a sports bet. So I don't think anybody should be any doubt it's sports betting. Now what happens to that legally in the U.S. and have a strong relationship with the regulators. We are in Nevada. Other sports players are not in Nevada. It is a key part of our offering. It's just what I wanted to say that. If you look outside the U.S., equivalents to prediction markets, effectively like betting exchanges with Betfair in the U.K. have existed for decades, and it takes a small single-digit share of the market. There are not the structural reasons for prediction markets to be the hot topic, the flavor of the month in other markets. And indeed, in some countries, they've already come out and said, it's illegal. I think the Netherlands have said, polymarket you're out, otherwise, it's going to cost you $450,000 a week in fines. France has come out against it. So it is a much smaller threat than I think it is -- than people perceive it to be in the U.S. But in the U.S., we're quite comfortable with our position, if that helps. Sorry for the long answer, but I thought it was going to come up at some time. Do you want to take the easy question? Rob Wood: I'll take the easy one. It's easy if I keep it simple. There is more complexity to it. But the simple part of it is Entain EBITDA does go backwards a little bit, as we referenced earlier. So consensus right now is GBP 1,126 million. We delivered GBP 1,160 million in 2025. So there's a little bit of a drop there. The second part of the answer is BetMGM. Even though BetMGM EBITDA does grow, remember, in 2025, we had an outsized cash distribution, including the 2024 surplus. So from a cash perspective, BetMGM is broadly neutral, whereas Entain EBITDA is down a little bit. That's the bulk of the answer. There are some other puts and takes. CapEx is down a bit, interest is down a bit. But that ETR point that I mentioned earlier, that's an offset against that. So the 2 primary drivers, Entain EBITDA down a little bit and BetMGM cash not up, just flat because of the 2024 credit that came through in '25. Luis Chinchilla: I'm Ricardo Chinchilla from Deutsche Bank. I was hoping if you could give us a little bit more of a breakdown of the different buckets for the mitigation strategy for 2026 and 2027. Is it going to be mostly marketing reductions? Do you guys anticipate operational efficiencies from the use of AI? And if you could also comment on how you anticipate the promotional environment to be in the U.K., given that all of the large players have actually referenced the fact that 25% of the market is not going to be able to compete. So we anticipate that there is going to be competition to take that share back. Stella David: Okay. So let me just talk a little bit about mitigation. There are many initiatives. The way we try and sort of bundle them up in the business, we probably put them into probably 8 key buckets of opportunity. It ranges from optimizing our marketing expenditure. It ranges to looking at our cost structure to make sure we're more efficient. It ranges to looking at procurement, lots of opportunity in the very large amount of third-party spend we have. So third-party spend is a very interesting area because we get lots and lots of feeds externally. We have lots of licenses externally. We have lots of external legal fees. I'm just adding them up, giving you a flavor of the different areas that we have. And then the devil's in the detail going down to specific line-by-line item activities. We also see that there is opportunities in terms of hopefully increasing our trading margin sequentially over time. But it takes -- it's a long-run thing, reducing fraud, taking the opportunity to get rid of bonus abusers. There's lots of things that build those buckets up to where they need to be. But I think the thing that I was trying to say is we have a detailed road map. We have sponsors behind that. We have targets that are being set. And we also have specific targets for how we increase the bandwidth from AI, which means that if you think about it, everybody who works in a corporate role or an in-market role or a finance role, they all have to become competent with AI so we can increase efficiency and make those people actually highly employable for the future. But again, efficiencies flow out of doing those kind of things. So there are just many, many initiatives that build up to the total number, yes. Promotional costs, do you want to have a stab at that? Rob Wood: Yes, sure. I'll have a go. So I think you're right. I think the 2 obvious large competitors in the U.K. will lean in as well as ourselves. The fourth largest probably not so much. But then there is such a long tail, as we've touched on earlier. And when you look at one of these staggering numbers as a consequence of these U.K. gambling tax increases, when you look at the tax that we'll now pay in the U.K. as a percentage of profit before tax, it's over 80%. So in how many sectors and how many parts of the world you operate in an environment where your income tax rate is over 80%. That's an astonishing number, which essentially means how can subscale operators possibly want to do business and spend money here. So I think with the exception of the 3 larger operators who I fully expect to want to, just like us, capitalize on it and seize the moment to take market share, I think you will see a lot less promos from mid- to smaller firms. The sort of the unknown dynamic is the black market. Of course, they'll be aggressive, why wouldn't they be? And quite what the impact of that is, we'll see from April onwards. Operator: We're just coming up to time. I'm going to -- just one last question on Italy from Andrew Tam from Rothschild. It wasn't touched on a huge amount in the presentation. Obviously, it remains a key market. So a bit of color on the performance this year and then actually opportunities and actually how you're thinking about going forward. Stella David: Well, I'm happy to just talk about some of the opportunities, and I'll let Robbie okay, just talk about some of the performance at the moment. So we are a distant #3 in Italy, but we do have some exciting plans coming up in 2026. I don't want to share the confidential information. But if you watch this space in the next few weeks, I think we'll be announcing some nice initiatives that will give some more high-profile presence for our business in Italy. There is quite a detailed plan that has been developed to help optimize our position, recognizing that we are disadvantaged in terms of our footprint because we don't do retail gaming. And that is something that is not available to us because we don't have the license and the license isn't open for that. But there are some other things that we can definitely do, but I don't want to spoil the surprise. So, talk about the numbers. Rob Wood: Can I just clarify, these are organic plans in Italy. Stella David: Sorry, definitely organic plans, yes. Rob Wood: So in terms of performance of the business, the way we look at it, we grew online 5% last year, mid-single digits. Retail grew 7%. EBITDA grew 8%. It's a healthy business that's growing nicely year after year after year. That's very well run, tight ship. And so yes, there's a gap to the top 2 operators, but we have a great healthy business in the #3, particularly with Eurobet, which is a very strong brand. Stella David: Are we -- any more questions? Or are we having to wrap now? There was one there. Unless it's a hard one. Pravin Gondhale: I'm Pravin from Barclays. Firstly, on the marketing expense, you sort of mostly answered that, but 45% in second half, given -- I appreciate its mitigation in U.K. seems a bit low given it's World Cup year. So do you think is there any scope in your guidance to sort of raise that if the market demands that, if competitors sort of market hard in second half? And then secondly, on regulation, is the worst behind us or you are still hearing anything in any of your markets there? Stella David: So on the marketing expense, we're investing well throughout the year. We're just shifting it forward because it's World Cup year. So World Cup, even though it's sort of June, July, it goes over 39 days, which is the longest World Cup there's ever been and there's more teams than there's ever been, means that the activity for acquisition, which is one of the things you really want to do in the World Cup comes quite a lot before then. So you're doing -- you do a buildup in terms of marketing. So it does pull investment through into H1. But hopefully, that acquisition then rolls through into H2. But I'm a marketeer by training. If we have any spare money, I'll always put more money into marketing. But we have to deliver the numbers, too. I realize that. So that's obviously an area that we'd always look at going forward. But I think World Cup is a great opportunity. I think it's going to be a bit of a roller coaster ride because there's so many teams playing. In the early days, the margins may be volatile. But hopefully, net-net, the whole thing is going to be an amazing thing, particularly for some of our markets. So given it's in the Americas, our business in Brazil will be really engaged in it. Our business in Canada -- by the way, Canadians, they love betting on soccer. Yes, absolutely love betting on soccer. And also, we've got quite a lot of our markets have teams already in the World Cup final. So we have a high overlap. So I think it will be good for us. And of course, and BetMGM, that small company in the U.S., BetMGM, yes. Regulation. Look, I think it is -- it's our duty to flag the challenges of the increase in taxes and the increase in regulation that it does fuel the black market. I think we talked about the Netherlands earlier. I mean that is the perfectly worst mix. You have highly frictionful regulation and high taxes and their own government or the regulator says that over 50% of their market is black. That is a place that no sensible government would want to go into, in my view, because actually, it's just fueling profits in a different part of the world. And so I think it is the job of people like ourselves to flag the dangers of the black market to try and dissuade other places going like where the Netherlands has gone. Rob Wood: Yes. Can I just make one point of clarification on marketing. So we do expect marketing to increase in absolute terms. You can probably model broadly in line with revenue. So the marketing rate holding firm. It's just the weighting that's H1 related. Yes. And then on regulation, aside from the U.K., then everything else looks a lot more of a balanced picture, which is nice. I know the Republic of Ireland, we have to do a wallet decoupling, which is a small adverse move there. But in Germany, it looks like touchwood, this might be the year that we get an increase in the slots cap, which, as you'll know, has driven the slots market to be 70%, 80% black. So that could be significant for us. We have New Zealand iGaming and other examples of clamping down on the black market as well. So aside from the U.K., and that's a big an aside, but aside from the U.K., it's a more balanced regulatory outlook, I would say. Operator: I draw your attention to the 2 slides that started about the podium positions and our quality of our foundations of our portfolio, which gives us that resilience and the ballast to absorb any regulatory changes. Stella David: I think we're going to have to wrap it up now. But before we do, I just wanted to say a huge thanks to Rob for his huge dedication and passion for this business. He's been in it for 13 years, I think. And I do think if I chopped his arm off, it would actually say Entain. Rob Wood: Glad. Stella David: Should try. No, no. But genuinely, thank you so much, Rob. I really, really appreciate it. And I'm sure everybody in the room, along with all your Entain colleagues, is wishing you the very best in your new ventures when you eventually start them. But he's not going anywhere just yet. He's helping us out on some things until the end of June, but Mike takes over formally as the CFO tomorrow. But Rob is still with us, and we just say thank you so much. Rob Wood: Thank you. Stella David: I'm just going to say something. Rob soak that in. You never get clapped at one of these events ever. This will be the first and last time you get a round of applause. Rob Wood: Thank you very much, everyone. I do really appreciate it. As I said earlier, it's been quite a ride. And you can tell I've been here a long time and also I don't wear suits very often because I looked this morning, and I've got GVC business card. Yes. Thanks, everyone. Stella David: That's funny. Thank you very much. Thank you.
Mary Vilakazi: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to FirstRand's results presentation for the 6 months ended 31st December 2025. I'll start with the -- I'll start the presentation with an overview of the group's operating environment over the last 6 months. In the period under review, the global macroeconomic backdrop continued to be characterized by heightened geopolitical uncertainty, and this is likely to persist for some time. Global growth slowed and inflation and monetary policy continued to play out differently across the world's largest economies. The FirstRand house view is underpinned by an expectation of ongoing geopolitical fracturing and reorientation. Unfortunately, that does imply more frequent global economic shocks, the impact of which is controlled for in our baseline and risk expectations. The current Middle East conflict is an example of one such shock. In South Africa, the combination of structural reform efforts spearheaded by Operation Vulindlela, fiscal discipline and the lowering of the inflation target have started to have a positive impact. South Africa's sovereign rating improved. The country was removed from the FATF gray list, the currency strengthened and inflation registered the lowest average in years. These factors have mitigated the impact of elevated global uncertainty within the SA macro context. The recent bond market impact of the Middle East conflict have seen bond yields lift 40 basis points off their recent lows. Whilst it is still early days, this is a relatively small impact on the overall bond yield reduction of 220 basis points over the last year. We are monitoring the unfolding events and the related impacts closely. Lower inflation allowed the sub to cut the interest rates and affordability pressures on consumers and households are easing. During the period under review, we saw household borrowing tick up marginally in real terms, whilst corporate borrowing continued to grow strongly, potentially signaling an emerging credit and investment cycle. The RMB/BER Business Confidence Index rose from 44 to 47 since the last quarter, an encouraging data point. Barring the post-COVID recovery, this is the highest business confidence level since 2015, giving us confidence about the emergence of credit and investment cycle for South Africa. Several countries in the group's broader Africa portfolio also made good progress on reforms. Nigeria continued to strengthen its macroeconomic position, while Ghana and Zambia have benefited from the post-debt restructuring reforms implemented over the last few years. The 3 countries made difficult and tough decisions and are now reaping the benefits of the reform processes. Certain cyclical factors also provided support with inflation moderating and growth stabilizing on the back of a positive commodity cycle. By the end of 2025, economic activity in the U.K. had slowed. Inflation eased but remained above target, and the Bank of England responded cautiously. Activity was supported by public sector spending. However, private sector demand remained constrained by still elevated borrowing costs and persistent inflation pressures. Moving on to an unpack of the group's operating performance. And just to recap how the group's operational performance in the first 6 months is tracking against the guidance for the full year to June 2026. Pleasingly, all the key line items are trending as expected. NII is up high single digits with a significantly NIM uplift with NIR print materially higher than the previous year. This strong top line performance has resulted in an improved cost-to-income ratio continuing to be in the 40s range. Credit is in line with our expectations with NPLs looking better given the supportive macro environment. As guided, the group's ROE is moving closer to the top of our stated range of 18% to 22%. These metrics clearly demonstrate the strength of the operational performance delivered by the business, which we are very pleased about. This slide unpacks the performance metrics, particular callouts include the strong growth in earnings, economic profits and NAV accretion. We are also pleased to be in a position to grow the dividend faster than earnings as the high ROE means we continue to generate excess capital. This is earnings and ROE over a 5-year period. The only point I'd like to make here is that earnings growth has shown a stronger trajectory over the past 3 years. This demonstrates the group's ability to deliver higher and more sustainable growth in earnings despite one-off contributions in each year's base, testament to the quality of earnings generated by our franchises. This slide demonstrates the group's -- that the group continues to accrete to NAV. The 5-year CAGR of 8% is testament to the group's ability to consistently deliver value for shareholders. Net income after cost of capital or economic profits is the group's key performance measure for shareholder value creation. We saw very strong growth in this period in NIACC. The 5-year CAGR of 14% in economic profit is particularly pleasing given that this was delivered during a period characterized by muted macros and sluggish GDP growth. It demonstrates the group's ability to deliver on its objective to capture the largest share of economic profits available in the system. The group's superior ROE benefited from an ongoing improvement in return on assets, which increased 5 basis points in the period. This was again a result of the quality of our operational performance, particularly the strong growth in investment income, a recovery in trading income and stable impairments. Gearing continued to decrease and the lower cost of equity contributed 10% to the NIACC growth of 26%. The reduction in the SA risk premium is potentially structural given the improved macroeconomic conditions, fiscal discipline as reflected in the recent budget and delivery on the reform agenda. The market pricing indicates a further ratings upgrade is possible in this calendar year, and this could present potential for a sustainable lower cost of equity going forward for South Africa. This is a snapshot of the operational performances delivered by our client-facing franchises. All the domestic franchises performed extremely well, more than holding their own in a fiercely competitive operating environment. FNB performed well, growing earnings by 8% and significantly lifting ROE to 41%. And within this, FNB SA grew earnings by 10%, offset by softer performance in broader Africa. RMB really had a standout 6 months, lifting its margins and ROE on the back of strong top line growth. WesBank again delivered a solid growth and an impressive ROE given how fiercely competitive the market is. The broader Africa portfolio continues to contribute to overall earnings growth. This year, the performance was driven by RMB's cross-border activities. RMB's in-country CIB businesses delivered an impressive increase of 62% in profits before tax. And FNB's in-country -- broader Africa in-country performance was impacted by macro pressures in Botswana and Mozambique, as we previously signaled. Pleasingly, the long-term strategy of growing in-country franchises remains on track. The group is relentless in its pursuit of high-quality earnings growth and superior ROE. And many of the decisions the team makes are anchored to these -- to deliver on these 2 ambitions. From a balance sheet perspective, this is why we are so focused on growing advances at an appropriate risk-adjusted returns and why we have a limitless appetite for deposits. We are working hard to defend and grow our large valuable transactional franchises, given that they provide a significant underpin to our ROE, and we continue to find sources of capital-light income streams. I'll now cover the performance across the 3 themes, similar to how I presented this in the June results. So let me start with the health and quality of our client-facing franchises. As I mentioned in the previous slide, FNB SA franchise performed really well. Turning to FNB Retail first. The business delivered 14% growth in PBT and was the most significant contributor to FNB's overall ROE uplift. The performance was characterized by solid top line growth with NII growth impacted by tough lending markets with muted demand, although we do expect this to pick up in the second half. NII growth improved on the back of higher transaction volumes and customer growth. The retail credit experience was better than we expected and supported retail earnings growth during this period. I just want to call out the turnaround in the customer growth in the personal segment, where competition is really tough. At June 2025, this segment was struggling to grow customers, but this has now reversed significantly on the back of a strong sales effort. Before migrations to the private segment, personal segment grew customers up 3%. In our early engagements with Optasia, we do see exciting opportunities to leverage their capabilities to further grow FNB's offerings in this segment. The private segment grew up -- grew a solid 8%, driven by customer acquisition and migration from personal segment. And overall, we continue to see growth in FNB's main bank clients. This is up 6%, which demonstrates FNB's success in switching customers banked elsewhere with a single FNB product to a full transactional offering, the strength of the FNB franchise. FNB commercial continues to grow off a high base. NII was supported by steady advances and deposit growth. The commercial deposit franchise remains by far the largest in South Africa. Solid customer growth has supported growth in fees and transactional volumes, supporting NII. Merchant Services experienced margin pressure -- margin compression as FNB responds to a competitive environment. In response, FNB has launched new Speedpoints yesterday with enhanced business solution offerings and competitive pricing points. FNB is still leaning in for SMEs that are well positioned to benefit from the early structural reforms and FNB remains the largest lender in South Africa to this sector. FNB's focus on meeting the needs of SMEs is also supporting its strategy to grow in the community economy with advances now at ZAR 17.3 billion and deposits at ZAR 43.3 billion. As I mentioned earlier, FNB continues to grow NIR and the growth is reflective of the different strategies to defend and grow the transactional franchise. The slide shows that the business continues to achieve steady growth across traditional sources of fees and importantly, is scaling new sources of fees supported by its platform strategy. Digital wallet and PayShap volumes are showing very strong growth. And the PayShap volumes also reflecting the strategy to fulfill client needs or the business strategy to ensure that they fulfill client needs and payments needs as client behavior and adoption evolves. The graph on the right-hand side demonstrates ongoing traction in FNB's long-standing strategy to monetize its value-added services. FNB -- the MVNO business, in particular, is scaling well with users increasing to 3 million. West Bank delivered another strong performance, growing advances in a market showing signs of a sustained recovery, driven by new car sales in the industry, which are up 16% and an emerging replacement cycle. There was a slight recalibration of risk appetite to capture the opportunities emerging from these market dynamics. Origination has shifted from only originating in low to medium risk to a higher proportion of medium-risk customers. This has resulted in some front book strain, but remains well within expectations. The insurance business continues to deliver good growth on the group's own licenses as reflected in the new business APE numbers on the slide. The growth in the in-force APE for life and short term demonstrates the quality of these books. The top line growth has not translated into PBT growth in this period as we continue investing for future growth. This investment in distribution capability will set the business up strongly to grow in FNB's customer base as well as the open market. A data point that supports this thesis is the 38% growth in APE that's been generated from the private adviser distribution channel. As I called out earlier, RMB had an excellent first 6 months of the year. Absolute advances growth declined due to the distribution strategy, but production was robust at significantly higher margins. NIR benefited from a private equity realization and a turnaround from the Global Markets business. All these drivers helped lift RMB's ROE. The HSBC transaction has been successfully completed, introducing 260 new large corporates and multinational clients to RMB. And the chart out here goes out to the technology teams who ensured that there was a seamless transition of these clients, building platform capabilities that the group will be able to leverage in future growth strategies. The strategy to build scale in the corporate transactional bank and the introduction of a dedicated executive focus is resulting in good progress on mining the client base, and it is clear that there's a great deal of runway here. I've already mentioned the turnaround in the Global Markets business. This slide demonstrates that the early recovery is emanating from across the portfolio and the business continues to focus on client franchise activities to ensure that the recovery is sustained. I want to cover the point-in-time ROE at the Aldermore Group. We are still -- we are still executing on a clear medium strategy to move this ROE closer to 15%. However, this journey -- the journey to operational efficiency has required a hefty investment into the current offshoring initiatives. This, in time, will increase operational leverage once completed. In addition, the NIM pressure across the industry has also had an impact on Aldermore's performance in 6 months. This will be partly addressed by Aldermore's objective to diversify into higher-margin asset classes as well as accessing other funding sources post the FCA's motor redress process when Aldermore again can go into the capital markets. The excess capital we continue to hold in the U.K. depresses the Aldermore ROE by 1.5%, but we are hopeful that this will be resolved by the end of this year. The performance from our broader Africa portfolio is pleasing, particularly given the macro pressures in Botswana, which is one of our larger jurisdictions. This portfolio is still relatively undiversified, so volatility in 2 markets will have an impact. However, despite these pressures, the overall profitability and ROE held up well, supported by good performances from Zambia, Nigeria and Namibia. There was cost pressure in Ghana due to the platform investment that's required there. RMB's cross-border business and in-country CIB activities performed strongly, as I mentioned earlier. I want to spend a little time on the overall strength and health of our origination franchises, and Markos will cover line-by-line growth in more detail when he takes over the presentation. This slide unpacks the group's long-standing philosophy on origination. One recent adjustment is a slight shift in WesBank's risk appetite, which I covered earlier. A key element of our FRM strategy is to originate to the most appropriate balance sheet and underwriting vehicles. This has created additional capacity for the group, creating additional capital and funding velocity to support further origination. On Slide 28, here, we can see that the lending growth we have achieved across brands, customer segments and product lines, and we are comfortable with these outcomes. Standouts here are WesBank corporate and commercial, where we have seen growth pick up as the economy shows signs of shifting to a more investment-led cycle. Given the macro backdrop, we expect the modest pickup in retail to accelerate in the second half. The pie chart on the right unpacks the results of the sector-specific lending strategies we have been pursuing. Again, this is a high-level unpack of the credit performance, which Markos will cover in much more detail. The point I'd like to make here is that retail is performing better than our initial expectations and the U.K. normalization this year in the CLR is in line with expectations given the base effect from last year's provision releases. And I want to spend a bit more time on the deposit franchises, which deliver our high-quality capital-light NII. It is extremely pleasing to see that all of the group's deposit franchises delivered good growth over this period. RMB's corporate deposit franchise showing good momentum in South Africa and in broader Africa. The steady strategy to build country deposit franchises in the broader Africa portfolio is also gaining traction. SA retail and commercial deposits continue to increase and grow off an already high base. The group once again benefited from the group treasury's active management of interest rate risk and ALM risks, ensuring that the group earns appropriate value from interest rate risk and credit premium. In the current year, this strategy produced an additional ZAR 1.2 billion of NII compared to an opportunity cost in the comparative period. With interest rates forecasted to further reduce, the ALM strategy is expected to yet again have outperformed as shown in the gray shaded area on the graph. The group's margin was up 8 basis points and up 15 basis points, excluding the U.K. operations. Improved asset margins were achieved through the mix of balance sheet growth and deliberate FRM strategies with disciplined segment execution to ensure appropriate risk return margin considering client channel and market conditions. Where quality credits did not meet the balance sheet costs and frictions, these were matched to alternative platforms and investor base as executed through the RMB distribution strategy. The negative impact to the group margin in funding and liquidity of 11 basis points was a consequence of both the levels of higher levels of excess liquidity and lower return on liquid assets. This is a strong margin outcome achieved through active FRM, which the group will continue to use as a central process to deliver shareholder value. A walk-through of the group's CET1 ratio shows a lifting in the capital position following ongoing optimization, FRM initiatives I've highlighted and Basel reforms. RWA consumption up 70 basis points reflects ongoing growth in constant currency as well as investment in strategic initiatives. A CET1 ratio of 14.4% provides the group with sufficient financial resources to deliver on the group's growth ambitions. The strong level of capital and FRM initiatives support a sustainable dividend cover that remains at the bottom end of the range. I will now hand over to Markos, and I will come back to conclude with the prospects and looking forward. Markos Davias: Thank you, Mary, and good morning, everyone. Considering the backdrop of the group's strategic and operational performance, I'm now pleased to present the financial review of the FirstRand Group for the 6 months ended 31 December 2025. Mary has covered the key performance highlights. And as a quick recap, the group delivered 11% normalized earnings growth, coupled with an improving ROE and a resultant 26% growth in NIACC. This performance did not include an adjustment to the U.K. FCA motor redress provision. However, legal and specialist costs of ZAR 333 million pretax and ZAR 244 million post-tax impacted operating expenses and earnings growth by 1%. The group expects the final redress scheme to be published by the end of March, and we'll update shareholders on any potential impact thereafter. NAV is up 7% with the stronger rand impacting the group's foreign currency translation reserve. Excluding this impact, NAV would be up 10% for the period. The final call out is that the group's stronger CET1 position of 14.4% places it in a position that if required, the group can absorb any of the possible negative outcomes from the U.K. FCA motor commission redress scheme, and Mary will touch on this further in the prospects. The group's normalized earnings growth is driven by a strong top line performance with both NII and NIR up 8% and 12%, respectively, creating positive jaws against credit impairments, which are up 6% at a CLR of 86 basis points and cost growth up 9%. I will unpack all of these shortly. As the only additional note to the slide, RMB implemented a debt-to-equity restructure during the period. As a result, a portion of the nonperforming loan was converted to equity with the remaining loan settled. In accordance with IFRS, the group recognized an investment income gain of ZAR 242 million for this conversion with a settled advance resulting in a release of Stage 3 impairments of ZAR 143 million, and the remainder of the loan was written off. The converted equity exposure is then recognized in associate for the group and the cumulative equity accounted losses resulted in a ZAR 377 million loss in associate earnings line, but the net impact to NIR is therefore ZAR 135 million. Netting these impacts results in only a ZAR 8 million gain being recognized, and hence, I will not cover it further in this presentation. Let me now turn to the quality of the financial performance and its key drivers, starting with NII. Turning to advances. Retail mortgage growth continues to be subdued as overall demand and customer affordability do start to show early signs of improvement. Production has picked up in recent months with this improvement expected to drive momentum into the second half of the financial year. WesBank VAF grew 14%, capturing a large proportion of the bounce back in vehicle sales. An important note is that additional retail risk appetite has been allocated. Mary did touch on this. We are using a data-led basis, and we're expanding lending to the quality side of medium-risk customers as the group continues to monitor improvements in retail credit lending conditions and proactively prepares for an improving affordability cycle. Commercial growth of 9% reflects the consistent and focused strategy Mary alluded to earlier with a continued focus on growing the SME customer base and unsecured SME lending is up 11%. Broader Africa continued to service customer needs for credit products in the group's presence countries, up 9% in constant currency. And as a callout, Zambia showed excellent in-country advances growth of 35%. Aldermore delivered 9% growth in advances, primarily driven by its strong origination network in property finance, which was up 15%. Final point on the slide relates to RMB where growth appears subdued at 7% down, but both translation impacts and the deliberate distribution strategy that Mary touched on earlier impacted its balance sheet growth. But what is pleasing about this, we now have a demonstrable financial data point on the underlying hypothesis with RMB's portfolio margin improving by 20 basis points and despite a smaller balance sheet, RMB lending NII is up 15% for the period. On this slide, we reflect the impact of the RMB distribution strategy and the group's currency translation impacts to total advances with each having a 2% negative impact to growth. The group's deposit franchises continue to show momentum across all of the customer segments with overall growth of 6%. This performance, when coupled with RMB distribution strategy enabled a net 2% reduction in total institutional and other funding and in particular, a reduced term debt securities funding cost, which further benefited NII and margins. The group's institutional funding mix and weighted average term continues to be well managed with the right side graph depicting the funding mix change between FI deposits and NCDs. Reflecting the group's balance sheet strategies and an activity view highlights the effective partnership and FRM discipline between the franchises and group treasury. Lending NII benefited from advances growth and mix changes as well as the improved margins in RMB. Despite 107 basis points decline in average interest rates, both transactional NII and capital endowment activities increased 7%, strongly supported by growth in invested balances and the group's ALM strategies and active portfolio management approach. Group Treasury delivered a very good outcome with NII up 61%, driven by the lower funding costs previously mentioned, improved deployment of currency funding and a partial offset in the lower margins on HQLA that Mary mentioned earlier. The U.K. NII is up only 1% with pressure on cost of funding and deposit margins given the continued elevated level of competition for liabilities and a reducing rate cycle, which had some impact on unhedged capital endowment. Mary has already covered the margin outcome earlier. And here, I depicted in the usual waterfall view. In summary, group margins, excluding the U.K., have expanded 15 basis points, 8 basis points to June '25 and then a further 7 basis points to December. Lending asset margins expansion contributed 12 basis points with RMB a significant contributor to the uplift and with continued disciplined pricing across all the other lending portfolios. As mentioned, the ALM strategies reinforced both deposit and capital endowment margins, with Group Treasury reflecting an 11 basis points impact, mainly due to the lower HQLA margins. The U.K. margin compression resulted in an offset of 7 basis points to the group. Moving to the group's impairment charge, which is up 6%. The group's total CLR remains below the midpoint of the TTC range, with a slight improvement of 2 basis points to the CLR excluding the U.K. An important note at this point is that in the comparative period, the U.K. CLR benefited from one-offs relating to various items, including last year cost of living, and these did not repeat in the current period. These supported the prior period outcome for the group CLR, that was 84 basis points. And if you look at the current period, 86 basis points, this is a normalization of these impacts in effect. The overall diversification of the group portfolio continues to support the CLR below the midpoint of the TTC range. The group's impairment charge of ZAR 7.3 billion further reflects the U.K. normalization as well as front-book strain from balance sheet growth, impacting Stage 1 provisions predominantly. I'll give more color to this shortly in the segmental breakdown of the charge. Stage 2 provisions and subsequent coverage are lower as a result of a migration of a few higher coverage watch list assets to Stage 3 in RMB. This then reflects in the slight growth in Stage 3 provisions and coverage of 43.8% and further contributing to the Stage 3 coverage were increases relating to an aging NPL portfolio and higher operational NPL inflows. The group's overall provision stock remains appropriate at ZAR 56 billion, with a performing coverage of 1.43%. The group's NPL formation continues to reflect a slowing 6-month trend across most portfolios, except WesBank VAF and RMB. RMB had a single counterparty in the cross-border portfolio that migrated straight from Stage 1 to Stage 3 and has been appropriately provided for at this point in time. The particular circumstances of this event are isolated and is not pervasive to the portfolio. This new slide depicts the group's segmental composition of its impairment charge. It aims to highlight the diversification of the credit charge as well as period-on-period increases of each segment's charge. What can be seen is that the U.K. impairment growth accounts for ZAR 338 million of the total ZAR 442 million group increase, with Commercial and broader Africa also up significantly for the period. These were then offset by lower impairment outcomes in Retail and CIB. With this backdrop, let me now unpack these individually. Retail CLR, as expected, trended lower into the bottom end of its TTC range, improved forward-looking macros, better collections, coupled with increased customer prepayments and reduced Stage 3 inflows were all key contributors. Strong book growth in VAF drove some front-book strain, which was more than offset by an improved mortgage outcome as house prices in [ Gauteng and KZN ] showed signs of recovery. Increased NPL coverage driven by time in NPL and slowing lower coverage inflows also weighed in. Retail unsecured is benefiting from lower front-book strain and pleasingly, a decline in debt counseling inflows, albeit this portfolio remains structurally higher than in the past. Commercial's impairment outcome continues to lag Retail, but with signs of improvement since June. There has been no new jump to default counters like in the prior period, but the group has proactively raised out-of-model provisions against the larger Commercial watch list, exposures and potential industry concentrations. The 94 basis points CLR is an improved rolling 6-month print compared to the previous 125 basis points, and remains below the midpoint of the TTC range. A significant driver of the increase in charge relates to what I refer to as good CLR in the form of front-book strain, which is as a result of the continued strong advances growth across most of the Commercial lending portfolios. RMB's impairment charge continues to be best described as benign, with a single counter migrating to Stage 2 due to a rating revision triggering SICR. NPLs continue to see some new inflows from the credit watch list, with an offset from migrations out of NPL as RMB's debt restructuring capability continues to successfully assist customers. In addition, the previously mentioned broader Africa exposure that migrated to Stage 3 also impacted RMB's NPL level and provision increases. And finally, the debt to equity restructure I mentioned earlier impacted RMB. But even if you add it back, RMB is below its TTC range of 30 basis points to 50 basis points. I've already covered the core one-off benefits to the U.K.'s 14 basis points charge in the prior period and the primary reason for the more than doubling of the charge to this year. And during this period, in line with the expectations, the U.K. CLR has trended up to the bottom end of the TTC range, with core performance and collections tracking well. Arrears continue to improve, with new origination resulting in some front-book strain. U.K. forward-looking macros have, on average, compared to the prior period, December '24, deteriorated and key call-outs are a weaker house price index, marginally higher inflation forecast and an upward trend in unemployment. This has resulted in an increased modeled FLI requirement for the period and accounts for more than 50% of the U.K. CLR charge to December. Broader Africa's underlying customer portfolio continues to be resilient. The increase in impairment charges mainly from proactive provisioning in Botswana to capture the potential impacts of the visible slowdown in activity, and additional out-of-model provisions have been raised to cater for the increased uncertainty in Mozambique. Moving on to NIR, where the group delivered 12% growth driven by resilient fee income, a robust recovery in global markets and a private equity realization. Pleasingly, fee and commission income continues to show resilience, up 7%, driven by inflationary fee increases, coupled with 4% growth in both FNB customers and volumes. RMB knowledge-based fees also printed good growth off a relatively high base as it continues to offer clients market-leading structuring, arranging and advisory solutions. Mary has already highlighted the key message from the FNB fee and commission outcome, including the 14% growth in value-added services income. What I'd like to do is just give a little more color to the financial impacts of two of the items she referred to earlier. Firstly, FNB defaulted customers real-time payment requests to the cheaper PayShap rail. This resulted in a reduced contribution and reliance on the old rail and associated fees, and it meant -- you would have seen in her chart, there was a graph that showed payment fees down. It meant that those fees are 33% down for the period, and effectively have been replaced by the other fee income lines if you look at the 7% up at the total level. This strategy also was the key driver to the sixfold increase in the values and volumes that Mary highlighted. Secondly, Mary also highlighted the pressure related to merchant services competition, with fees relatively flat for the period. But what I can also note is that billable devices are actually up 10% for the period. And again, the key takeout is that despite these two big impacts, the group has managed to grow its fee and commission 7%. Total insurance income is up 5% and requires further unpacking. Life is up 13%, with underlying performance in underwritten life growing 14%, credit life up 15% and core life growth of 16%. FNB employee benefits were also moved into FNB life from commercial during the period due to the synergies of the group life and employee benefit offerings, and were a slight offset to the other life product performances based on take-on of a large client Mary mentioned earlier. Short-term insurance continues to scale ahead of expectations, with insurance income up 17%. WesBank benefited from the exit of MotoVantage, which resulted in a rundown portfolio being recognized this year, with no base as the investment was classified as held for sale in the prior period. The offset to these good performances relate to a continued reduction in the income from participation agreements. We have previously noted these are winding down and any new business is being written on the group licenses. In addition, broader Africa is down 26% due to additional weather-related claims in Namibia and a lackluster premium growth in credit-linked products in Botswana. And finally, the group continues to invest in its operational and distribution capabilities, which Mary touched on. In the insurance income, the attributable costs get offset against these and reflect in this chart against the growth levels. These investments are expected to result in ongoing support for growth in policy numbers and new business APE. Trading and other fair value income was driven by the strong recovery in RMB global markets, which Mary unpacked in some detail earlier. This graph does, however, reflect the extent of the recovery and highlights that in the prior period, there were also contributions from fair value income from RMB's PI portfolio and other group treasury related benefits, which in the year-to-date have all been replaced by the global markets revenues. Turning to the significant growth of 65% in investment income, which is predominantly driven by a significant realization in the private equity portfolio. But in addition, RMB's associate earnings in the light gray on the chart also remain resilient, especially considering the lost earnings from the prior year realizations that would no longer be in the base. It highlights the quality of the underlying performance of the investee companies. Pleasingly, despite these realizations, the unrealized value of the private equity portfolio has also increased by 12% to ZAR 8.4 billion, driven primarily by an earnings uplift. WesBank's associates, TFS and VWFS, also had improved performances, driven by advances in NII growth and a good impairment print. VWFS also benefited from a large one-off in the current period, which is not expected to repeat next year. Lastly, the improved overall performance in the bond and equity markets resulted in an uplift of ZAR 239 million in investment income related to the assets backing the group post-retirement employee liability portfolio. Turning to operating expenses, which grew 9%. As mentioned earlier, the costs incurred in response to the U.K. FCA consultation paper resulted in a 1% impact to cost growth, and its impact is included in the appropriate cost lines in the pie chart. Going forward, once a redress scheme is announced, any future legal costs would be allocated against the provision raised as opposed to expense through the income statement. The group also continues to invest and allocate resources to its technology platform. The total IT functional spend across all cost category is up 13% to just under ZAR 11 billion. A more detailed breakdown of this is included in the presentation annexures and the booklet. Professional fee growth of 26% is as a result of increased spend related to the implementation of the HSBC transaction, including API integration, as well as some external professional support during the implementation of a core banking platform in Ghana. These costs are not expected to repeat next year. Advertising and marketing costs increased 14% as FNB continued to invest in its brand value proposition and marketing activities. And the increase in the group's depreciation, repairs and maintenance costs are mainly due to increased campus requirements as staff return more regularly to the office. In addition, amortization costs were impacted by the implementation of a new global markets platform, a portion of which was previously capitalized. And then finally, on OpEx, included in other expenses is the increase in the Department of Home Affairs ID verification fee, which had a 6-monthly impact of ZAR 60 million, and is a new ongoing cost of customer onboarding and compliance. Staff cost remains a significant portion of the cost base and increased 7% for the period. Salary increases of 5%, coupled with average head count growth of 1.5% were the key drivers. Head count growth was focused on growing the group's points of presence, particularly in community economies, with 18 new branches opened during the period. In addition, Mary has mentioned the U.K. strategy to offshore some of its enablement head count as part of improving the overall U.K. cost-to-income ratio and ROE. This does, however, result in transition costs with a period of duplicate head count to appropriately manage the offshoring execution. To date, the costs incurred totaled GBP 2 million and is expected to ramp up by June as the execution nears completion. As highlighted earlier, this performance has resulted in positive cost jaws, with an improved cost-to-income ratio anchored below 49%. And in closing, and as an overall summary from my side, solid group performance with strong business execution and financial outcomes that reflect the progress against the group's strategic framework. Thank you. I will now hand you back to Mary to cover the group's full year prospects. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. We are nearing the end. Thanks, Markos, and turning to prospects. Looking forward in terms of macro developments in South Africa, further moderation in inflation creates scope for additional policy rate cuts. This is, of course, barring the events that are taking place at the moment with the oil price from the Middle East conflict. But set aside, combined with structural reform improvements and supportive commodity cycle prices, we believe that this is expected to begin lifting real GDP growth. With regards to broader Africa, despite global uncertainty, economic prospects for most countries in the portfolio are improving, thanks to lower inflation and policy rates and economic reform progress and supportive commodity prices. We expect this to continue. The key exceptions are linked to domestic governance and debt pressures in the case of Mozambique and the need to diversify the economy following the diamond price correction in the case of Botswana. Hopefully, we have provided you with appropriate insights to support our view that FirstRand is on track to deliver another strong operational performance in line with guidance. We expect to deliver high single-digit growth in NII, a strong NIR trajectory and an improving credit outcome. The combination of a growing top line and an increased focus on managing costs will result in positive jaws, something this management team is fully committed to. As the last bullet on this slide points out, this guidance does not include any potential adjustment to the current accounting provision for the FCA process in the U.K. In closing, I want to identify two significant strategic advantages this group has at its disposal to generate an ongoing strong operational performance for the rest of this year and beyond. Our client-facing franchises are healthy, and they are well positioned for growth as they have demonstrated in the last 6 months of this year, delivering top line -- good quality top line growth, growth in earnings and improving returns. Our FRM strategies, which I consider to be a clear differentiator for FirstRand versus our peers, have added significant value in driving balance sheet efficiency, margin uplift, capital strength and ultimately, a superior ROE. Our strong capital position means that under any expected scenario outcomes from the FCA redress scheme, the Board and the management team are confident that the group will be in a position to pay a dividend on normalized earnings pre the motor provision. This brings me to the end of the results presentation. I'd like to thank the employees across the FirstRand Group for your diligent efforts in looking after our businesses and ensuring that the group executes on its vision of delivering shared prosperity to our customers, to each other, to the communities that we serve. You can be proud of what the group has delivered to its shareholders. And lastly, thank you to our customers across the group. Your trust in us inspires us to innovate, to support your current and evolving needs. I will now pause to take questions, if there are any. Thank you. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. There's a question in front. Unknown Analyst: Mary, compliments on the excellent results. I find it very challenging to see you're sustaining this level of growth because you seem to have accelerated your growth tremendously while the economy has not helped you much at all. If I may make a minor comment, on Slide #11 of your earnings, it would have been very helpful if you had included in that slide a line showing the headline earnings per share. And maybe you could consider that in the future. And then on your private equity realizations, every presentation, they're a feature of the results. What fascinates me is the size of the deals that you must be doing and the quantum. And again, I asked the question how sustainable that might be. And on Slide 23, the global markets growth of 62%, again raises the same sustainability question. And I found your comment at the end, quite telling in terms of the dividend in the context of the U.K. provision. Because unless the world falls apart or the U.K. motor market falls apart, that's never going to impact your overall earnings to any extent to affect your dividend. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. I will take some of those questions. And then Emrie, you can prepare for the private equity related one and the global markets one. Let me see if my memory holds well. So we are confident that we can deliver on the full year earnings guidance and the strong growth print. And as I said, I think the quality of our franchises and the diversified portfolio that we have, it means some other businesses are doing well and others are not doing well. We can have an overall good outcome. So -- and I suppose we've had a number of very large one-offs in the past. And I think our commitment is to ensure that we are overall ensuring that -- the portfolio growth. So the last period that we've operated in, in the last couple of years, the macros in South Africa haven't been particularly supportive, and we are constructive on a better operating environment going forward. And I suppose the fact that our business is 80% in South Africa, this is really the market that we are looking to see some recovery. And you can see we are gaining traction in our strategies in broader Africa, where some of those markets are growing. So I think you can take comfort that our earnings growth is sustainable. I'll ask Emrie to comment on the RMB private equity portfolio, which actually has quite a number of investments and then the global markets recovery -- oh, sorry, Markos will make a note of the headline earnings per share disclosure for next time. I'll come back to the U.K. Emrie Brown: Thanks, Mary. Yes, just firstly, private equity portfolio. I think first of all, for us, we have been very focused over all the years to build a diversified portfolio. And as indicated in the booklet, we, I think, now take a much more active portfolio management approach in respect of the portfolio, which ensures that we make continuous investments. I think if you think back about 5 years ago, that was one of the challenges, we didn't regularly invest. And -- so the portfolio management from an investment perspective, but also managing continuous realizations to have the velocity of capital is very much a focus on how we think about our private equity business. So I think where we are at the moment, based on the contribution of private equity to the overall RMB and FirstRand results, this is the level that we're comfortable with, and we manage that part of our business very much with that in mind. On global markets, yes, I would say this year is more a bounce-back from a low in the prior year as well as very deliberate strategies in how we take our global markets products to our full client base. So we feel that this is a more normalized performance. But having said that, the global markets business is exposed to geopolitics and market movements. So it is always a business where there can be fluctuations, but we feel the foundations we've laid in the business set us up for a much more sustainable performance going forward. Mary Vilakazi: And lastly, on the U.K., I mean the reason we make that statement is because the final redress scheme by the FCA is going to be announced end of this month, they have undertaken. And we haven't -- and we are waiting for that final redress scheme to ultimately understand what the financial impact on the group will be. So we don't have the number, but we also know that there are some scenarios that -- where the number is not the amount that we've provided. And hence, we make that comment that as we've worked through all the expected scenarios from the consultation paper, shareholders can be assured that the capital that we sit with should be able to cover any of those scenarios. So still high levels of uncertainty. But hopefully, the end is near with the redress scheme over the next month. Do we have any other questions online? Sorry, James. James Starke: James Starke from RMB Morgan Stanley. Mary and Markos, congratulations on the strong results. Three questions from me. The first, I think maybe we can pass this one to Harry. On the customer gains in FNB, can you perhaps expand on some of the initiatives you've deployed to turn around the growth trends there? Then just pleasing progress on the cost-to- income ratio more generally, I mean, how do you plan to sustain this momentum going forward? And then lastly, just on capital generation, it is very strong. Can you please expand on your plans for the surplus capital generation, particularly with regards to acquisitions? Mary Vilakazi: Okay. So we just take it in that order. Harry? Hetash Kellan: James, thanks for the question. If you look at the customer growth, I mean, if you look at the investments we've done in terms of infrastructure and people, so you've seen growth in our head count, but a lot of that growth is sitting in our branch network. Branches, I mean, if I remember the number right, between December last year to December now, our branches were up 13. So 13 branches new. At the same time, we're investing in what we call AgencyPlus. That went from 63 to just over 170 AgencyPlus in the last 12 months. So we actually got a larger footprint in order to be able to serve customers. And clearly, we've capacitated that with individuals who are able to sell. So I mean, I think that's probably the largest drivers. Mary Vilakazi: Lots of hard work, James. I think on the cost-to-income ratio, Markos will cover the expense piece and the sustainability of the cost trajectory. But James, fair to say that our ambition is for that cost-to-income ratio to have a full handle looking forward. So Markos, maybe on the cost? Markos Davias: Thanks, James. I mean, I guess we've said it a few times, but positive jaws will result in the CTI improving. So that focus is actually what drives it. And during budget periods, I mean, that's kind of the key point that we drive into the teams when they bring budgets. If you have revenue up by a low number, you better find a way to manage the cost there. What I would say on the cost that's important is that we have a high investment base already in the base. And as we deliver projects, we reinvest that from the current cost structure into the base. So we're not doing this at the expense of important investments. And you can see, where there are one-offs to be incurred to increase implementation costs and the likes, we take them. But effectively, it actually is the base, size of the cost base allows us to kind of manage this to the objective we stated. Thanks. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. And then, James, on your question on the surplus capital. So I mean that we acknowledge. I guess the Board's target range for the CET1 is 11.5% to 12.5%. So at 14.4%, we are way over. I guess you have to appreciate the fact that we've been operating in an environment where there's been high levels of uncertainty because if it wasn't that we had to make sure that we are well positioned to deal with any adverse scenarios, I suppose we would have reconsidered those capital levels in the last year. So hopefully, we are close to doing that, and then we can have a bit more clarity on the capital that we require. So I think we have enough capital to fund any of the growth initiatives that we are looking at. We are not holding on to that level of capital because there's something very big pencil-marked, James. I think it's just to get through the U.K. uncertainty soon. You can trust that we will do the right thing when we have better clarity on the way forward. Andries, do you want to comment? Unknown Executive: Mary? Sorry, yes. Unknown Attendee: [indiscernible] from Reuters. Mary, what's your strategy, if any, around East Africa? I mean we're seeing a lot of activity there. We're seeing South African lenders also having a lot of interest there. I mean are you thinking about it? Are you actively looking in that region? Mary Vilakazi: Okay. This one, I can definitely pass on to Andries, who looks after the broader Africa strategies and as well as M&A activities. Andries Du Toit: Thank you. I'll also link to the previous one. When we do expand to M&A, there's two fundamental cornerstones, we underpin our disciplined FRM and we have to add shareholder value. On expansion, we look at capabilities. Can we acquire capabilities, customers? Is it franchise value? And then to your question, geographical expansion. Eastern Africa is a key market we want to enter. We've had discussions. It didn't come to fruition, and we're looking at appropriate vehicle, but it's very important from a FirstRand perspective, we won't [indiscernible] on our FRM discipline and how do we create shareholder value. Mary Vilakazi: Yes. So we keep looking. We've been looking for a while, though. But hopefully, some of the consolidation activities that are taking place in the market will open up some opportunities for us. There's another question, okay. Okay. There's -- yes, you come here. Do we have questions on the webcast? We've got a few. Okay. Unknown Analyst: Mary, if I may. On Slide 60, there's a caption that says share price incentives linked, a negative. Now I follow your share price probably as closely as you do, and I haven't seen it negative. I know it bounces around. I'm just fascinated to understand the basis of that comment. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. Thanks. Markos can take that. Markos Davias: Thanks. That refers to the share scheme -- employee share scheme, which previously vested at a higher level based on the performance in prior periods. And all it means is that currently, that vesting is expected to be lower based on the current performance measures. And when I say high, it was higher than 100% in the prior year. So it's currently accruing at 100%, which is below that. So it's negative year-on-year. That's the main reason. There's not share price -- there's no share price impacts into the employee share scheme. It comes through IFRS 2 charge. Unknown Analyst: Did I hear you correctly that -- I saw your structured aspects of your performance incentives. Is that the key point here? Markos Davias: Yes. So it's just the way the accounting plays out on the long-term incentive scheme, as such. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. Let's go to the line. Maybe what you can just maybe do is just check if some of the questions we've answered already, and maybe we don't repeat them. Operator: We'll do. Thank you, Mary. Some of them have already been partially answered. We'll start with Baron Nkomo from JPMorgan. Given your strong capital ratios, in which segment or region do you see the greatest opportunity to deploy capital over the next 2 years? I think that's been partially answered. The second one is, what is your strategy to deepen and grow broader Africa franchises? Mary Vilakazi: Okay. So I think opportunities that we see for -- in our business, I think the Corporate and Commercial sector, I think we are quite optimistic about the structural economic reforms and activity that will happen in SA. So I guess there, we would say that that's what we've earmarked. Hopefully, the Retail credit expansion as suggested provides more opportunities for further growth of our Retail franchise. So yes, so I think -- we still think that our balance sheet will probably track more the Corporate, Commercial aspects of opportunities. And I guess, broadly, we are looking at making sure that all our franchises are growing and are actively taking advantage of the different various opportunities. So it's not just penciling in those growth aspects for SA. And then how we -- plans to grow broader Africa. I suppose we are executing on organic strategies. We had an opportunity of buying the Standard Charter book in Zambia. So that provided us an opportunity to scale some of our existing markets. The M&A team continues to look if there are other inorganic opportunities that come our way. But I'd say that we are quite small in Ghana and Nigeria. And I think in the various markets, we still think we've got runway in our current existing portfolio. So -- but there's lots of focus to ensure that we are capturing the growth that we are expecting from the rest of the region. Operator: We've got Charles Russell from SBG Securities. He's got three questions. I think one of them has been answered. The first one is, can you take us through key dates and FirstRand's decisions and responses over the coming 12 months relating to the U.K. motor commission issue? The second one is, can you unpack the 37% growth in trading and fair value income? And then the third one, I think we've answered, saying our CET1 looks very full, but I think we've answered how we're going to manage that. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. Markos? Markos Davias: So on the dates, I mean, we've called out that even recently as this week, the FCA have said that by the end of March, they will give an update on the final redress scheme paper. Obviously, our legal teams would need to work through that together with our specialists, and we would have to then regroup on a path of action if we are happy with the paper or if we are not. So that will play out in the next month. Thereafter, we'll update shareholders once we've got a sense of kind of what the impact is. We've got all our models built and ready for the various scenarios that can play out. And in the booklet, we do call out kind of the three criteria, which are the biggest drivers of impact in things that we didn't agree with in the original paper. Mary Vilakazi: And then the trading income question. Unknown Executive: I didn't get it. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. That's basically the global markets recovery that we spoke about. And there is a slide, I don't know which slide that is, that shows where the global market growth came from. I mentioned that slide number. And yes, I suppose Emrie has covered it earlier on that for global markets, it's a recovery because we had a number of years where we went backwards, and I think it's largely reflective of global markets. Operator: Then the last set of questions is from Ross Krige from Investec. He says, just to clarify on the FY '26 guidance. Does unchanged guidance imply an expectation of high mid-teens earnings growth ex U.K. motor provisions and assuming PE realizations as expected? And then the second question, on the U.K. motor commission-related OpEx, how do you expect this to unfold in H2 '26 and beyond? Mary Vilakazi: Okay. I think Markos has covered the last point by saying that depending on just the path that we take forward, any expenses that get incurred will be charged against the provision that we've released. I think it was just to give an indication that, that base, hopefully -- that base should -- hopefully should not have as many legal expenses as we have incurred, and I think that's how they will be dealt with. And the other question, [ Levo ]? Operator: Just on the guidance. Mary Vilakazi: On the guidance, yes. Okay. Let me step through this slowly. So the guidance we gave for the full year, it had the U.K. provision, obviously, in the base. And we said, assuming there's no other provision, earnings growth should be up mid-teens. So that's the guidance that we are confirming today. And private equity, there's uncertainty. There's always uncertainty, but I guess we are not saying we are -- we're not saying that the guidance is subject to that realization taking place, but we note that there can always be changes in the dates. I think my RMB team are still good for their number. Operator: We have additional questions that have come through online. So the first one is from [ Mario Stratum ]. He does say, well done with your strong insurance new business growth and thank you for your improved disclosure on these businesses. Can you please speak to the near-term outlook for operating expenses growth, the rundown profile for other participation agreements and the potential for short-term insurance to double policy count by FY '30. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. Andries, maybe you can take some of that and then I will fill in for the insurance. And [ Mario ], I suppose all these questions are related to insurance, even the expense outlook. Andries Du Toit: Yes. No problem. The strategy was to obviously originate our own licenses. So that will continue. We're quite confident to the numbers that you've alluded to, both as we go in our own channels and also open market on the short term. Our expenses will probably continue to be at high end as we invest in new products and also new distribution and also further into new business lines where we're underrepresented. And maybe... Mary Vilakazi: Yes, but I mean there's a fair chunk of investment in the distribution channel, Andries, which, once we get to a point whereby surely we have -- we are at the levels we want to operate with, I mean it will be rather acquisition cost versus an investment in that. So that I would say is a part of cost that profile should change. Markos Davias: Maybe just a point to add on the other participating agreements. This year, you'll see the 66% decrease means there's a ZAR 50 million 6-monthly base there. So it's a much more manageable base than what it was in the past year. So its impact is reducing. Operator: And then we have the last one, it comes from Harry Botha from BofA Securities. To clarify, is the mid-teens earnings growth potential still intact for 2026? Are you making any technical adjustments to your hedging program for yield curve changes? Mary Vilakazi: Okay. So the first answer is very simple. Harry, no change to the full year earnings guidance that we provided. Hope that helps. [indiscernible] do you want to comment on the hedging strategy? Unknown Executive: So the hedging strategy follows an investment process. So with the volatility we've been experiencing this week. Certainly, there would be tactical adjustments, but that would follow the investment process that's in place. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. I think -- are we at the end? Operator: Yes, we have no further questions. Mary Vilakazi: Okay. All right. No further questions in the room? Okay. Well, thanks, everybody, for joining. Thanks for your time, and we'll see you in 6 months' time.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded, March 5, 2026. The Recording will be publicly available on TASE's website. With us on the line today are Mr. Ittai Ben-Zeev, CEO; and Mr. Yehuda Ben-Ezra, CFO. Before I turn the call over to Mr. Ittai Ben-Zeev, I would like to remind everyone that this conference is not a substitute for reviewing the company's annual financial statements, quarterly financial statements and interim report for the fourth quarter and full year of 2025, in which full and precise information is presented and may contain inter-alia forward-looking statements in accordance with Section 32A of the securities law, 1968. In addition to IFRS reporting, we might mention certain financial measures that do not confirm to generally accepted accounting principles. Such non-GAAP measures are not intended in any manner to serve as a substitute for our financial results. However, we believe that they provide additional insight for better understanding of our business performance. Reconciliations between these non-GAAP measures and the most comparable related GAAP measures are included in tables that can be found in our earnings press release and in the slide presentation accompanying this call. Both can be accessed on the English MAYA site and in the Investor Relations portion of our website at ir.tase.co.il/in. Mr. Ben-Zeev, would you like to begin? Ittai Ben-Zeev: Good evening, Israel Time, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'm happy to host you in our earnings call. The financial statements for 2025 show that TASE ended the year on a high note. Q4 2025 capped another record year for TASE with revenues reaching an all-time high of ILS 149.3 million for Q4 and ILS 563.5 million for the full year 2025. These results represent a record increase of 29% year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter. We also saw a record increase of 58% in adjusted EBITDA, and an increase of 9.5% in the adjusted EBITDA margin as well as an all-time high in TASE net profit with a 79% increase compared to 2024. All this was achieved while continuing to maintain organic growth across all TASE's core activities despite Israel having fought a multi-front work for most of 2025. Yehuda Ben-Ezra, our CFO, will discuss the financial statements in detail later in this call. For most of 2025, trading on TASE took place against the backdrop of the ongoing world and elevated volatility. Against this background, the Israeli capital market has exhibited resilience and economic strength during 2024 and 2025. The leading equity indices on TASE broke their historic record on numerous occasions, outperforming the leading global indices. The TA-90 Index and the TA-35 topped the global return table with gains of 46.6% and 51.6%, respectively, compared to 17.9% on the S&P 500 Index and 21% on the NASDAQ-100 Index. In addition, the positive and exceptional trend was also evident in the sectoral indices, particularly in the financial sector. At the end of 2025, TASE equity market cap reached ILS 2 trillion, a 46% increase from year-end 2024 due to the impact of the rise in TASE equity indices. Trading volumes also set new records with the cash equities ADV rising to ILS 3.4 billion in 2025, 57% increase over 2024. The IPO market stagged an impressive resurgence in 2025 with 21 IPOs and an additional 5 companies listing their shares without raising capital, including 1 dual-listed company. Overall, the total capital raised on the equity market sold to ILS 21 billion compared to ILS 8 billion in 2024. In 2025, the TASE bond market displayed increased trends as a major source for debt funding, both for corporate issuers and for the Israeli government. Corporate bond issuances totaled ILS 187 billion in 2025, compared to ILS 124 billion in the previous year. The Ministry of Finance raised ILS 137 billion in Israel during 2025. The strong demand and successful issuances in Israel and abroad, is a powerful sign of confidence in the Israeli economy. Trading volumes in the corporate bond market rose by 9% in 2025, compared to the volume in 2024, while the government bonds ADV, amounting to ILS 3.3 billion similar to 2024. We have continued implementing our strategic plan to strengthen business activity. As part of a significant milestone in strengthening TASE international profile and attracting foreign investors, I'm pleased to update that we have completed transition to a Monday through Friday trading week at the beginning of 2026. In the last 2 months, this move has already led to a substantial influx of foreign investors during Friday trading, exceeding the average recorded on Sundays in 2025. In addition, on February 23, the cyber giant Palo Alto Networks began trading on TASE, officially making it a dual-listed company on the U.S. and Israeli market, which constitutes a profound vote of confidence in Israeli capital market. And we believe this will lead to further breakthrough for the local capital market while strengthening TASE position on the international financial stage. Foreign investors too expressed confidence in the local capital market and purchased equities totaling ILS 4.4 billion in 2025, mainly in the financial and defense sector. This is in marked contrast to the previous year when foreign investors' activity resulted in net sales. It is worth noting that in the first 9 months of 2025, the value of foreign investors holdings in non-dual listed equities grew by 70%, and in September 2025, the value of their holdings reached an historic high of ILS 64 billion, reflecting the deepening presence in the Israeli market. The Israeli retail segment continued to show significant increased interest in the domestic market and the growth in the opening of new trading accounts continued throughout 2025. The retail investors opened approximately 200,000 new trading accounts, 25% more than in 2024. In the trading segment, we continue to invest and develop the indices market in 2025. In total, we launched 10 new equity and bond indices during 2025, of which 7 indices are exclusive and we intend to continue developing new indices to increase and diversify the products as part of our strategic plan to refine and develop more investment products for the investors. At the end of December 2025, the total AUM of all TASE indices amounted to ILS 148 billion compared to ILS 99 billion at the end of 2024. The total AUM of TASE equity indices amounted to ILS 91 billion, compared to ILS 48 billion at the end of 2024. In the derivatives market, we have seen average daily trading volume grow by 14% compared to 2024. In light of the success of the equities market making reform, that I have mentioned in my previous calls, 7 large companies included in the TA-35 Index joined the tailor-made market-making program, resulting in the trading volumes of those companies increasing significantly. I would now like to provide you with an update to what I reported to you in our previous earnings call regarding examination of a partial or full sale of our index activity. We are currently negotiating to enter into a deal to sell the activity and to cooperate strategically with a major international entity. At this stage, there is no certainty as to when, if at all, the negotiation will bear fruit and result in a binding agreement. I would also like to update you regarding the dividend payment to the current shareholders. You will no doubt recall that we previously adopted a dividend distribution policy for the years 2024 to 2026, pursuant to which TASE is to distribute a cash dividend to its shareholders at a rate of 50% of the annual net profit for 2025. The dividend according to the policy amounts to ILS 90.5 million. In addition to this, in light of the substantial growth in TASE profitability in 2025 and the consequent significant increase in the company's liquid reserves, TASE will distribute a special dividend of ILS 54.3 million. In all, TASE will distribute a total dividend of ILS 144.8 million, representing ILS 1.56 per ordinary share that will be paid on March 20, 2026. Furthermore, during the coming year, TASE management will examine drawing up a buyback plan with this being subject to market conditions and other relevant considerations. In conclusion, the 2025 financial statements show that despite all the challenges of the last few years, we are witnessing the growth and resilience of TASE and of the Israeli economy. Our financial statements continue to reflect our investment in developing new and diverse products for the benefit of the public and the investments made for the benefit of technological and innovative developments so that we continue to achieve the goals we have set for ourselves in accordance with our strategic plan for the coming years. And now I'd like to hand over to Mr. Yehuda Ben-Ezra, who will continue with a review of the year results. Yehuda Ben-Ezra: Thank you, Ittai. As Ittai mentioned earlier, TASE outstanding fourth quarter financial results capped off a highly successful 2025 with the company is delivering record revenues across all lines of businesses. Throughout the year, including the fourth quarter, TASE demonstrated remarkable resilience, [ given ] Israel faced an extended multi-front conflict. This will thus highlight the strength of Israel economy and the stability of its capital markets, showcasing best consistent performance under challenging conditions. I will continue with Slide #7, which shows some of the key highlights from our results for the year 2025. Our revenues in 2025 reached a new high of ILS 563.5 million, increasing by a record 29% compared to the previous year. Adjusted EBITDA in 2025 improved significantly by 58% to record of ILS 293.8 million, while the adjusted EBITDA margin also improved from 42.6% to 52.1%. Our net profit displayed substantial growth of 79% and increase to a new record of ILS 181 million. Our basic EPS in 2025 reached a new high of ILS 1.97, increasing by a record 81% compared to the previous year. I will continue with Slide 17, which shows some of the key highlights from our results for the fourth quarter. Revenues amounted to ILS 149.3 million compared to ILS 115.4 million in the same quarter last year, a 29% increase. This is the highestly quarter of the revenue since the TASE IPO and growth was evidenced across all operations. Our revenues from non-transactional services amounted to 63% of total revenues, the same the corresponding quarter last year. Expenses totaled ILS 84.5 million compared to ILS 84.2 million in the same quarter last year, a 0.4% increase. Adjusted EBITDA totaled ILS 80.8 million, compared to ILS 46.8 million in the same quarter last year, a 73% increase. The increase was due to higher revenues. Net profit amounted to ILS 51.6 million compared to ILS 25.4 million in the same quarter last year, a 104% increase. The increase was due mainly to higher average for services. This increase was partially offset by the increase in tax expenses. I will continue with Slide 15, where we can take a deeper look into our revenues in the fourth quarter. Revenues from trading and clearing commission increased by 27% compared to the same quarter last year and totaled ILS 54.7 million. The increase is due mainly to higher trading volumes, particularly in shares and in the volume of trade share reduction of mutual fund units. Revenues from listing fees in annual levies increased by 14% compared to the same quarter last year and totaled ILS 25.4 million. The increase is due mainly to revenue for annual levies as a result of the increase in the numbers of companies and funds that pay an annual levy. In addition, revenues from listing fees and examination fees were also higher due to the increase in the volume of funds raised. Revenue from clearing [ and ] services increased by 58% compared to the same quarter last year and totaled ILS 41.2 million. The increase is mainly due to the completion of regulation measures relating to the OTC transaction. Other factors related to the increase were the higher custodian fees as a result of the increase in the value assets under custody and the updating of the custodian fees price [ lift ]. Revenues from data distribution and connectivity services increased by 19% compared to the same quarter last year and totaled ILS 27.4 million. The increase is due to an increase in revenues from index licensing fees, mainly as a result of the increase in the value and the use of TASE indices and from higher data distribution revenues for businesses and private customers in Israel and abroad. I will continue with Slide 18, which shows some of our fourth quarter expenses. Compensate expenses decreased by 4% compared to the same quarter last year and totaled ILS 43.3 million. The decrease was due to a decrease in variable compensation. Computer and communication expenses increased by 11% and totaled ILS 11.7 million. The increase results mainly from an increase in the maintenance cost of new computer system and licenses and from an increase in man power and projects. Marketing expenses decreased by 40% compared to the same quarter last year and totaled ILS 1.7 million. The decrease is mainly from a decrease in campaigns. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by 6% compared to the same quarter last year and totaled ILS 15.2 million. The increase in depreciation expenses was due mainly to the upgrading of infrastructure and the launch of new products. Net financing income totaled ILS 2.5 million compared to net financing income of ILS 2.6 million in the same quarter last year, a 1% decrease. Let's now go to Slide 19, where we can review our financial position. At the end of year 2025 [Audio Gap] our adjusted equity includes deferred income from listing fees and excluding open derivatives position balances, represents 77% of the adjusted balance sheet. We held ILS 494 million in cash and investment financial assets. The balance of the bank loan totaled ILS 21 million. The surplus equity, other regulatory requirements at year-end 2025 totaled ILS 550 million compared to ILS 627 million at year-end 2024. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in the TASE equity resulting from the buyback of TASE shares and a distribution of dividend in 2025. This decrease was partially offset by the net profit in 2025. The surplus liquidity, other regulatory requirements at year-end 2025 totaled ILS 310 million compared to ILS 172 million at year-end 2024. The increase in surplus liquidity is mainly due to the increase in the EBITDA. I will continue with Slide 20, where we can review our fourth quarter cash flow highlights. Cash flow from financing activities resulted in negative cash flows of ILS 13.1 million compared to negative cash flow of ILS 4.9 million in the third quarter last year. The higher negative cash flow are due mainly to proceeds of ILS 10 million from the sale of our arrangement shares in the same quarter last year. Cash flows for investing activities resulted in negative cash flows of ILS 38.5 million compared to negative cash flow of ILS 20 million in the same quarter last year. The increase in negative cash flow is due to -- mainly to the acquisition of financial assets net. TASE free cash flow amounted to ILS 75.4 million compared to 35.9 million in the same quarter [Audio Gap] the increase in the EBITDA. Also, the Board of Directors today approved the payment of a dividend of ILS 144.8 million, representing ILS 1.56 per ordinary shares to be distributed on March 2026. In conclusion, TASE performance in the last quarter and throughout 2025 demonstrates its solid foundation as well as the fundamental resilience and growth potential of the Israeli economy. And with that, I will return the call over to Operator to conduct the Q&A. Operator: [Operator Instructions] The first question is for Hector Erazo from Jefferies. Hector Erazo Pinto: This is Hector Erazo on for Dan Fannon at Jefferies. On expenses, as you think about the budget for 2026, how does that compare to 2025? And what are the areas of spend that are different going into this year? Ittai Ben-Zeev: Hector. So I think looking at this year, in terms of our marketing budget, it will not exceed what we had in the last couple of years. In terms of the compensation of the employees, it should be similar according to the agreement that we have with the employees. And we continue to invest in our IT, and you can estimate the CapEx ILS 55 million to ILS 60 million a year. So shouldn't be any surprises on that front. Operator: [Operator Instructions] There are no further questions at this time. Thank you. This concludes the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results Conference Call. Thank you for your participation. You may go ahead and disconnect.
Milena Mondini: Good morning, everyone, and welcome, and thank you for joining us as we review Admiral 2025 year-end results. Today, we'll be announcing another remarkable year of financial results and strategic progress. So I will start with the key highlights before handing over to Geraint on the financials and to Alistair on U.K. Insurance and Costi on Europe. I will then come back to reflect on what we have achieved over the last 5 years and finally explain how the evolution of our strategy position us to create even more value in the years ahead. So let's start with the main achievement for 2025. We delivered a record profit of GBP 958 million. This was up 16% year-on-year, reflecting disciplined execution and growth across the group. 2025 also marked exciting progress across data, technology and AI and the evolution of our motor proposition, including the acquisition of Flock subject to regulatory approval. Today, we'll also outline the evolution of our group strategy. This strategy builds on a very strong platform, but more diversified customer base and the competitive advantage we already have to deliver higher long-term value for all our stakeholders. We will also cover our new capital distribution framework, including share buybacks. Geraint will take you through that later. So more in detail. As already mentioned, 2025 was a year of record. Our customer base increased 7%, while we continue delivering strong customer outcomes with the group Net Promoter Score over 50. Group profit reached a new high, driven by record U.K. Motor profit, passing now the bar of GBP 1 billion, following another record year in 2024. This was achieved in a challenging market environment, thanks to positive evolution of recent years and continued underwriting discipline across the cycle. Importantly, this was not just a U.K. Motor story. All parts of the group contributed. In the U.K., Other Personal Lines, Admiral Money combined delivered a profit of GBP 88 million. Europe also performed strongly with a fast return to profitability in Italy and great results in France, which Costi will cover shortly. 2025 was also a year of strong shareholder returns, supported by a 7% increase in dividend per share, a very strong capital position with a solvency ratio of 193% and another stellar return on equity of 53%. Beyond the financial results, 2025 marked an acceleration in our strategic progress. We are pleased with our rapid advancement on artificial intelligence, particularly with the value delivered by machine learning models and the new gen AI center of excellence to scale priority use case, train our people and provide them with the right tools. We are managing more than 150 gen AI initiatives across the group, including support to over 4,000 colleagues, some agentic models with promising initial results and more potential to come. Selling more product to our existing customers remains a key growth driver with our multi-risk customers now exceeding GBP 1.6 million. Across Europe, we continue to evolve our broker propositions with stronger segmentation and more customized offering, driving better margin, as Costi will explain later. We also continue to innovate in Motor. An example is our partnership with Octopus that positions us well in the fast-growing salary-sacrifice scheme for electric vehicles with a tailored risk-based proposition aligned with our ambition to support customers in making greener choices. And in Admiral Money, completing our first forward flow deal was an important milestone as it opened up a more capital-efficient growth path and support higher returns and lower volatility. On M&A, the integration of More Than is now fully completed and contributed positively. Elephant disposal is also completed. And finally, early this year, we announced our intention to acquire Flock, a company we had invested in since 2024. Flock offers a telemetry-based fleet proposition with an effective feedback loop to improve safety and performance. It's an excellent strategic fit with our U.K. Motor expertise with promising underwriting and claim synergies and it's closely aligned with our joint ambition to improve safety on the roads. And by combining Admiral data ambition to Admiral's strength with Flock technology, we see an opportunity to develop a differentiated fleet business in an underserved market. So in summary, 2025 was a record year for Admiral with strong profits, customer growth and progress in technology and strategy. Now before handing over to Geraint, I want to take a moment because this will be the last time that you joined me on stage to present results. And I think it's fair to say that the strength and discipline of the performance for about 2 years are a good reflection of his leadership, his judgment and his consistency over the last 12 years as CFO, a period during which Admiral tripled its turnover and grew profit from GBP 350 million to almost GBP 1 billion. And please join me to congratulate Rachel who is here with us today and will succeed to Geraint, bringing deep knowledge of Admiral, a strong track record within the group and a great skill set for the role. So thank you, Geraint, and congratulations, Rachel. Geraint Jones: Thank you. Good morning, everyone. 12 years of not being conduct. One last time, let me talk you through the main drivers of an excellent 2025 result. Lots of positives, lots of good milestones. I'll cover the U.K. Motor loss ratios, the dividend, strong capital position. And as Milena mentioned, I'll talk you through the change in the approach to capital return that we've announced today. To start with though, let's look at the component parts of the group profits and the main ratios. The group combined ratio was very positive again at 80%. That was 3 points higher than 2024, though the impact of Ogden accounted for around 2 points of that difference. So in reality, only a very small change. And that, in turn, has made up of a slightly improved expense ratio and a slightly higher loss ratio. The latter as expected, due to the higher loss ratio 2025, underwriting year in the U.K. Motor having an impact. On to the results then. In U.K. Insurance, overall profit was GBP 1.1 billion. That's GBP 110 million higher than 2024, including Ogden, or GBP 180 million higher if Ogden is excluded, very big increase. The U.K. Motor results, I'll cover shortly, but the result there was a record profit, just over GBP 1 billion. And we're very pleased with a really strong year for the U.K. Other Personal Lines, Home insurance, Travel and Pet insurance, all profitable, strong growth. And the combined profit there was GBP 62 million, was nearly triple of 2024's result. In Europe, we're reporting a much better results, improving by nearly GBP 30 million versus 2024. We see growth in higher profits in France, small loss in Spain, impacted by new reinsurance arrangements and a recovery to profit in Italy. Good to see that happen so swiftly. And worth reminding that we continue to hold prudent booked reserves in Europe in the upper end of our range and the best estimates are also conservative. Admiral Money had a great year. Profit was double 2024's, benefiting firstly from good growth in the balance sheet. But also, as we talked about at the 2025 half year from profit generated from selling some back book loans in the first half and selling newly originated loans, which don't hit Admiral's balance sheet. That will be a continuing, we think, attractive feature of the Admiral Money business model. We continue to see good margins on the unsecured loans business, which makes up the big majority of the balances, but the results from car finance, which was relaunched in late 2024, are also encouraging. Credit loss experience remains very solid, and we hold an appropriately prudent provision for losses. There are some other comments on the page, which cover the movement in the share scheme costs and the other line, and you've got the usual extra information in the back of the pack. All in all, group profit was up 16% or 28% if you exclude the impact of Ogden on both years. Let's take a look at the very impressive U.K. Motor results. So this is a summarized income statement plus some of the key ratios and some commentary. Both years include the impact of the Ogden discount rate change. And so some of those year-on-year comparisons, you see look a little less stronger than they really are. We show the pounds and the percentage impact of Ogden in the table and starting with the top line. Customer numbers increased by 2% year-on-year, 50,000 added in the first half and around 80,000 in the second half, so 1% increases half-on-half. As Alistair will talk a bit more about later, we reduced our prices in H1 last year, and hence, average premiums have fallen. And so despite our bigger portfolio, turnover was down by 7% as the team took a disciplined approach in the competitive U.K. market and reflecting the claims trends that we were seeing. As a result of the reduced premiums and continued claims inflation, the current year loss ratio for '25 is 3 points higher than '24. And of course, we also don't see quite the same positive impact of Ogden in '25 than we did last year. And those 2 items are the main drivers of the higher combined ratio you see at the bottom, which is as we expected. The underwriting results improved by around GBP 40 million with higher earned premiums and a much lower reinsurance charge offsetting the higher net claims cost. You'll remember that we had much more limited quota share recovery assets coming into 2025, and we see a similar picture as we exit 2025 too. Net investment income was higher, up to a record level due mainly to higher invested assets at a similar rate of return. Profit commission was notably higher as we started now to recognize income on the high profitability 2024 underwriting year, though we still haven't yet recognized income on '21 to '23 or on 2025. We do expect to see revenue coming through on '21 and '25 very soon. I already mentioned the main drivers of the higher combined ratio we see at the bottom. But within that mix, reserve releases were 10% year-on-year, basically the same like-for-like. Next up, we'll take a quick look at the main U.K. Motor loss ratios, which, as always, are a key driver of this result. The chart shows the U.K. Motor discounted book loss ratios and there are generally positive and consistent messages to report here. We can see -- we see continued strong improvements in '23 and especially on '24 over the last year. 2024 is clearly a very good margin year on a very large premium base. In 2025, we see burn cost inflation around mid-single digits level and that's a small improvement in H2 versus where we saw things at the half year point. The first discounted booked loss ratio for '25 is at 78%. That's 7 points up versus '24 at its equivalent point. And that's again basically in line with our expectation. On an undiscounted basis, 2025 is 85% compared to 77% for '24. Now we expect '25 will be a good profitable year. You can see it looks healthy on the chart at the 12-month point, and it should develop positively from here, though obviously won't end as profitably as 2024. We maintained very high reserve strength. It's very close to the maximum percentile, and we expect that will reduce a bit further in 2026 towards the middle of our range. Overall, on claims, positive experience in line with our expectations, usual trends and there's more information in the back of the document. Moving now to look at the capital position. So this is the bridge of the solvency ratio from half year to full year '25. There's a couple of observations. Firstly, the capital generation in the second half is largely offset by the final dividend. And secondly, due mainly to pretty flat revenue in '25 versus '24, we see a much smaller change in the capital requirement in '25 than we did in '24 and particularly in the second half. And then the change in the capital requirements and the other items in the middle almost cancel each other out, leaving the group with a healthy -- very healthy, almost flat ratio of 193%. Short update on the internal model. Lots of hard work by our team, as usual, over the past few months since we last updated you. We now expect to make our application for approval shortly. Post approval, we'll target solvency coverage in the 150% to 170% range, probably at the upper end, in part to give us flexibility for smaller M&A opportunities. We'll give more information on the post-model approval capital position at the appropriate time. Speaking of M&A briefly, Milena mentioned earlier, the Flock acquisition. As we said in the press release, if that gets regulatory approval and completes in the second quarter, we estimate the impact on solvency will be a bit less than 10 percentage points and is, therefore, largely absorbed by the strong position. Next up is the dividend. So these are the details of the dividends, split between interim and final. And for 2024, we call out the impact of the Ogden change, which was obviously significant on the dividend for last year. The proposed final dividend is 90p per share. That brings the total for the year to 205p, over GBP 620 million, and that's 7% higher than 2024. The difference in the payout ratios year-on-year is due to us starting to use capital to purchase shares for the share schemes, which we said back in August would start in the second half of '25. You'll remember that historically, we issued new shares each year for those share schemes rather than purchased in the market, but we haven't done that since 2023. In the fourth quarter last year, the trust bought about 1 million shares for just over GBP 30 million. And the capital that we use for dividend and the share scheme purchases equated to basically the same percentage of earnings across both years, close to the 90% level. And in 2026, we expect the trust will buy around 3 million shares. Next up, we'll cover the change in the capital return approach. On the left, we show a summary of our capital allocation framework. Milena will talk a bit more about Point 1 later, which covers how we allocate capital to our businesses. And we're generally comfortable that around 10% of earnings is a fair guide of what we need to retain to fund and invest in growth. And that's meant an average dividend payout over the last 5 or 6 years of 90%. Step 2, we know the importance of strong cash returns to our shareholders. So the ordinary dividend remains at 65% of earnings. Step 3, as just mentioned, we purchased shares for the share plans. And final -- and Step 4, not finally, using some surplus capital is an option for funding M&A. And then that leaves the surplus capital and that's what's changing today. Historically, as you know, we've returned this to shareholders in the form of special dividends. But from the interim 2026 dividend, we'll change that Step 5 to be either buyback and cancel shares or pay a special dividend depending on what the Board believes is the best option. For 2026, subject to regulatory approval, we expect to buy shares at the interim and final dividend dates. The 90% guidance we've given out over the past few years to cover the ordinary plus the special or buyback plus the share schemes purchase should generally hold moving forward. And then one final slide for me to sum up. Looking back on 2025, clearly, it was a really strong year, record profits, record returns to shareholders, lots of positive results and developments across the group. For U.K., the Personal Lines and Admiral Money, great results, strong and swift turnaround in Europe, progress on the internal model, very pleasing stuff. And looking ahead, a few comments on what we might expect in 2026. On growth, in summary, we plan to grow everywhere. That's obviously subject to how the markets develop, in particular, when prices in U.K. Motor start to increase. For turnover, I'd expect a bit more growth in '26 than we saw in '25. And in general, of course, we expect faster growth from the newer businesses, U.K., the Personal Lines, Admiral Money and Europe. And then a few comments in respect to the group profit. Firstly, obviously, we will see more of an impact of the less profitable '25 underwriting year feeding into the 2026 results, but we will still benefit from good releases and profit commission coming through on 2024 and '23 and some of the earlier years too. Secondly, we project continued improvements in the results in aggregate for the newer businesses that we talked about. And finally, we expect group profit in '26 to be quite flat versus '25 after a really very strong last couple of years where profits have more than doubled. And all those comments, of course, subject to the usual caveats on markets, geopolitics, war and weather. That's it from me. I will hand you to Alistair now to talk to us about U.K. Insurance. Alistair Hargreaves: Thank you, Geraint. Good morning. I'm very pleased to take you through an excellent set of U.K. Insurance results. 2025 has been a record year across all our lines of business, underpinned by disciplined execution, customer centricity and strong operational delivery. Starting with the headlines. Customer numbers reached 9.6 million, up 9% year-on-year, with strong contributions from Motor, Household, Travel and Pet. We delivered GBP 5 billion of turnover and GBP 1.1 billion of profit, passing the GBP 1 billion profit milestone for the first time. We continue to deliver competitive prices, great service and good customer outcomes, which is recognized in customer feedback. We remain #1 in Trustpilot and achieve an NPS over 55. Importantly, 1.6 million customers now hold 2 or more products with us, a 14% increase year-on-year. Customers buying more products gives us better data to improve risk selection for all products. is a driver of our retention advantage in Motor and growth in new lines of business. Overall, an efficient source of growth that contributes to improved expense ratios. Recent announcements are leading to a more predictable regulatory landscape. Outcomes from the Motor insurance task force and premium finance review were in line with expectations, and the Home and Travel claims handling review is now complete, and we have no significant concerns. Let's turn to the Motor market. Starting with claims trends, frequency was largely flat following the marked decline we saw in 2024, and severity has returned to more normal mid-single-digit levels. Our expectation is that these trends continue, but the current macro environment introduces some uncertainty. The graph on the left shows a dark line for claims burn costs. Claims burn costs increased steeply through 2022 and then continue to increase but more modestly. The light line for market average premiums shows a lagging response to claims costs, increasing rapidly in 2023, outpacing claims costs and then declining. Both lines are indexed to 2021, and you see they cross in 2025 as increases in claims costs now exceed increases in premiums over the period. Let's focus on recent market prices. On the right, you see prices continue to decline through the second half of 2025, though at a slower rate than in the first half. We estimate average premiums declined by around 10% in 2025, broadly in line with movements reflected in ABI data. Since the start of '26, market prices are relatively flat with some differences in strategy between market participants. Market prices need to increase imminently. EY forecasts a Motor market combined ratio of 111% for 2026. This is on an earned basis, and EY assumed price increases through 2026. So delays in market price increases will put more pressure on this 2026 market combined ratio. Turning to Admiral U.K. Motor. In 2025, we focused on disciplined cycle management and maintaining our strong advantage in pricing, claims and customer retention. In 2025, we reduced rates by around half as much as the market. All the decreases were in H1. In H2, our prices were broadly flat. The left-hand graph shows that this led to a decline in new business market share in the second half of '25. Lower new business was more than offset by strong retention, resulting in modest policy growth, though lower average premiums resulted in a drop in turnover. In '26, we started increasing premiums with low single-digit increases at the start of the year to reflect the claims outlook and maintain good written margins. Taking a longer view, our disciplined approach results in varying growth through the cycle, but maximizes value and growth over the medium term. The graph on the right shows our year-on-year vehicle growth rate in blue, in yellow is our written loss ratio. Our loss ratio is consistently better than the market, but still fluctuates within a range due to the cycle. We respond quickly to claims trends, even if it results in slower growth in the short term. It then enables us to grow quickly when loss ratios are low, for example, by 15% in 2024. Since the start of 2020, our vehicles covered has grown at a CAGR of 5% and with an average combined ratio advantage of around 20% versus the market. We continue to invest in strengthening our pricing, claims and claims capabilities, including embracing predictive AI and gen AI, which Milena will talk more about. Electric vehicles is a great example of our pricing and claims focus. We lead in this growing segment. We're very competitive whilst delivering comparable loss ratios to high levels of reparability. Our overall approach is to be disciplined and grow when the time is right, whilst focusing on driving advantage in pricing, claims and customer retention. We're confident this will result in growth and maximizing value over the medium term. Let's move to our other U.K. Insurance lines where we've had an outstanding year. We welcomed 650,000 new customers, year-on-year growth of 21% and tripled profits across Household, Travel and Pet. In Household, market premiums softened further and subsidence claims were elevated in the second half of the year. Our own pricing remained more disciplined than the market and weather-adjusted loss ratios improved by about 2 percentage points. This, combined with top line growth meant that although prior year reserve releases normalize from the 2024 exceptional levels, we still delivered a record Household profit. The More Than integration is complete with around 380,000 Home and Pet customers transferred successfully. This has accelerated growth and enhanced capability, particularly in Pet. Travel grew customers by 29% and continued its positive profit trajectory. Pet grew even faster and reached breakeven just 3 years after launch. All 3 lines are now profitable with clear momentum and strong positions across their markets. So -- I'm going on too fast. So in summary, in 2025, we've delivered record profits. But in addition, Motor remains disciplined and well positioned ahead of the market. Pricing increases expected in 2026. Household, Travel and Pet are performing extremely well with growing scale and margin and customer satisfaction and retention are excellent with more customers choosing to buy more products from us. We enter 2026 with confidence that we'll continue to deliver sustainable profitable growth over the medium term. Milena will talk more about this shortly. Now I'll hand over to Costi for Europe. Costantino Moretti: Thank you, Al, and good morning, everyone. For our European operations, 2025 has been a year of consolidation. We have directed our efforts towards strengthening the operational core across our 3 markets, focusing on the fundamentals of discipline and optimization. It has been a positive period where we have made good progress on our strategy, providing a positive contribution to the group's ongoing diversification efforts. Moving to the financial results. The headline for the year is a return to combined profitability across the region. The business delivered GBP 39 million Motor profit on a wall account basis, of which GBP 11 million is the Admiral's share. Going back to the business performance, we closed 2025 with a good combined ratio of 94%. While this represents a significant year-on-year improvement of over 10 points, it is important to look at the individual market dynamics. In Italy, with ConTe, we have reached a small profit which is a GBP 30 million recovery from the previous year. This significant recovery was driven by strong actions taken on the expenses and a deliberate and disciplined pruning of the portfolio. We made the conscious decision to prioritize technical margins over volumes, leading to an expected vehicle in force reduction. With the business now on a more stable footing, we are in a position to look towards growth, always keeping the focus on its underwriting quality. Moving to Spain, where Admiral Seguros' reported results includes about GBP 8 million of one-off accounting impact related to a change in the reinsurance structure. Going forward, we have established new multiyear and large reinsurance arrangements at the European level with our historical partners. Effective from 2026, these agreements aim to improve capital efficiency and provide greater stability to our results. Excluding this specific item, the Spanish business is nearly breakeven. This is supported by the direct business, which provides a positive contribution to the results. While our diversification initiatives with ING Bank and brokers are showing very encouraging improvements while scaling up. Closing with France, where L'olivier has had a very strong year. We achieved double-digit growth in both turnover and profit with results reaching GBP 16 million profit and we surpassed 0.5 million customers. This performance demonstrates that L'olivier is successfully applying the Admiral model, maintaining a strong combined ratio advantage versus the market while driving growth through digital channels. Let's move to review our strategic progress, starting from the shift in distribution. We have focused heavily on our new brokers proposition in Italy and Spain. As the business mix indicates, we have moved away from an initial test and learn proposition towards this new one, which focuses on building long-term relationships with the intermediaries and also targets better risk segments and higher-margin business in line with our expectations. The early metrics from this shift are positive and provide a solid foundation. We are seeing solid improvement compared to our order book across all the key metrics like higher income per policy, lower frequency and lower cost per claim. And these improved fundamentals have contributed to a 9-point reduction in the overall loss ratio. While there is still more work to do, we expect these benefits to continue as more growth will come and the new proposition mature. In France, we are continuing to diversify through our household insurance product. We now cover over 100,000 risks, a 25% increase versus last year, which provides a meaningful second pillar to our French operation. Regarding efficiency, we have managed to steadily reduce the European motor expense ratio by 7 points since 2022. This has been a necessary step to remain competitive. And even in Italy, despite the reduction in turnover, we improved the expense ratio by 1 point through automation and more streamlined digital customer experience. These operational improvements are also supported by our new common data platform, which is now operational across the 3 countries. This asset allows us to deploy data futures and machine learning models across border with greater technical agility and quality, which is essential for maintaining our edge in a rapidly evolving market. To wrap up, we're very pleased by the progress made this year. Our European operations have reached combined profitability, giving us confidence in their future contribution to group's broader diversification strategy. Our objective moving forward is to leverage this stability to increase our scale and enhance our earnings. We have the right expertise, a solid data and technological framework and a disciplined path ahead. Thank you. I'll now hand over to Milena to talk more about the group strategy. Milena Mondini: Thank you, Costi. So as you just heard, 2025 was an excellent year across the group. Now I would like to take a moment and step back with you and see what we have accomplished over the last 5 years. In 2020, we announced our 5-year group strategy based on 3 pillars: business diversification, Admiral 2.0 and Motor evolution. And today, we're extremely proud of what we achieved in this time frame. First, remarkable growth with turnover up nearly 90% and group risk and profit almost 60%. We returned overall GBP 3.2 billion to our shareholders. Second, we diversified the group with more than 50% of customers now coming from other lines of business or geographies and contributing close to GBP 100 million of profit. In addition, we developed new business such as Pet insurance in the U.K., Commercial insurance in the U.K. also, Household insurance in France and we extend our addressable target market with U.K. Commercial Insurance as just mentioned in B2B2C, in B2B and B2B2C in Europe by opening up the broker distribution channel. Third, we refocus our portfolio. We exit all of our price comparison sites and the U.S. insurance business to concentrate on the growth great opportunities we have in U.K. and in Continental Europe. The acquisition of More Than and of Flock are instrumental to strengthen our product diversification in the U.K. Fourth, we overachieved our Admiral 2.0 ambition. With cloud migration, new data platform, tech stack renewal, hybrid working, scaled agile delivery, predictive AI excellence at scale and the announcement of our multiproduct offer. Fifth, we made further progress in our Motor proposition, including market leadership in EV, as Alistair mentioned, growing telematic product, fast-growing subscription model and short-term insurance with our brand for the youngest Veygo. Last but most important, throughout this period, we maintained our historical and quite unique strength. More than 20-point combined ratio advantage versus market in our core business, a unique 30-point delta return on equity versus market, a group NPS above 50 and the legendary Great Place to Work status. So back to nowadays where this leave us. Our current market presents very significant growth opportunities. They are large, attractive, growing with a combined size of around GBP 130 billion. And today, our market share across many of these markets remains relatively modest, and this leaves us substantial headroom to grow. We're continuing evolving our offering to unlock further opportunity in lending with the first forward flow deal and a new car finance product in Europe, extending our distribution and product lines. Commercial Insurance and SME are also good opportunity to provide strong proposition to a large underserved market, experiencing similar trends to Personal Lines 20 years ago with more digitalization, pricing sophistication and automation, where we can deploy our competitive advantage. Organic growth in all these segments will be driven by market-leading expertise in price comparison site and digital distribution, channels that are growing faster than the rest of the market. Cross-selling and higher retention and increasing economies of scale; and fourth, automation and synergies across the group. Our plan is based on organic growth, but we will consider opportunities for selective accretive acquisitions to accelerate diversification. Importantly, the diversification also reduced over time our exposure to any single market cycle, making Admiral more resilient in time. So having delivered on our strategy, we now look forward starting with the market context that is fast evolving, but also presenting very interesting opportunities and tailwinds. The U.K. market cycle in Motor is expected to turn and the regulatory environment is expected to be more predictable as Alistair commented before. Market consolidation could create more rational dynamics overall. More importantly, the rapid evolution of AI and gen AI represents a major opportunity for us. Predictive AI is becoming the key driver of underwriting differentiation. And we already have 12 points of loss ratio advantage versus market and this is a big driver of it. Gen AI and automation offer efficiency potential of up to 30% in the long term for customer service area and may also disrupt distribution and proposition in the long run. What is interesting to us is also the potential to accelerate the transition to direct distribution in markets where direct has more room to grow. Another major trend is the advancement of car technology, another key pillar of our strategy since 2020 Motor evolution. In the short to medium term, the most impactful change will be the shift to electric vehicles, expected to reach around 80% of new car sales by 2030, where we already have underwriting and market share leadership, as Alistair commented before. This is followed by an increased penetration of advanced safety systems. These technologies have a positive impact on collision frequency, but this has been so far more than offset by an increase in severity. As for EV, our scale and sophisticated prices approach results in a competitive advantage. In the long run, we expect autonomous vehicles, now in their infancy, to grow in share and reach a point where frequency decrease will not be anymore offset by severity. For this to happen, we need to see technology, customer appetite, regulation, infrastructure, all to further develop across countries. It will take anyhow long time to scale with higher level autonomy expected to represent around 4% of the car park by 2035, and the overall market premiums expected to be continuing to grow for at least 20 years, supported by number of cars on the road and the mix. We remain very close to this evolution, having, for example, underwritten Wayve, an autonomous vehicles player in the U.K. since 2018. As AI and mobility trends evolve, our view is that the key winning factor will remain sophisticated data-driven decision-making, scale and a lot of good quality data at scale, an entrepreneurial mindset consistently looking for opportunity to innovate and cost efficiency. And those are all areas where Admiral has a structural advantage, including 8-point expense ratio delta versus market. So overall, we are strongly positioned to leverage those key trends. Now let me introduce our evolved strategy framework. First of all, this is not a discontinuity in our strategy. It's an inflection point where we start compounding what we have already built, a more diversified business, stronger platforms and proven competitive advantage. The focus is now making those trends to reinforce each other and more deliberately over time. I think about this strategy with a set of reinforcing layers, each layer supports the next and within each layer, the benefit compound as the business grows. The other layer of our strategy is where we compound performance. Our first pillar is scaled selectively and profitably. And this is about translating diversification into sustainable growth and accelerate margin in our newer lines of business as they mature. The middle layer is where we compound capabilities. Our second pillar is future-proof our competitive advantage and it is about leveraging on the strong capability we have built in data and technology and the multiproduct benefits to improve customer lifetime value and our structural edge. At the core, at the center, we are compounding our foundations. Our third pillar is amplify the Admiral DNA, and this is to ensure that our culture, our talent, the innovation and the impact continue to evolve, providing stability and long-term direction and resilience as we grow. So the pillars are interconnected. Stronger foundation are a driver of stronger capability and in turn, these are enabler of stronger performance. Let me now walk you through each of these pillars in more detail and explain what we intend to prioritize and what we aim to deliver for each. So first pillar, scaling selectively and profitably. We have a clear ambition to continue to scale all our business while increasing margins in our newer lines. In U.K. Motor, we'll continue to grow as we have done in every cycle since Admiral was founded with discipline and at the right time, as Alistair illustrated earlier. We'll continue to invest to maintain our market-leading margins. In other lines of business, U.K. Personal Lines, Admiral Money and Europe, we will continue to grow and at a faster pace of Motor on average, generating greater economy of scale and higher margins. A key focus will be transferring our underwriting and claims trends from U.K. Motor into other products and geography as well as creating more cost synergies across the group and leverage the benefit of multi-risk ownership. Overall, we expect to deliver strong revenue growth everywhere, including reaching top 3 position in Other Insurance Personal Lines in the U.K. and substantially higher margin for those business combined, more than doubling profit by 2028 and more profitable growth thereafter. Finally, we will continue to develop our new and still small U.K. Commercial Insurance business, building a stronger SME proposition and growing commercial motor starting with the integration of Flock. Now let's move to the capabilities that are the key enabler of the growth ambition that we just discussed. It's a virtuous circle that starts from our structural strength in data, customer focus and speed with the objective to increase customer lifetime value. And with higher customer lifetime value, we create optionality, the flexibility to reinvest in these capabilities or to invest and grow or to retain margins. On the left side of the slide, we see how this focus translate into better underwriting results and efficiency. We'll continue to extend our advanced predictive AI capability, increasing both the quality and the velocity of pricing across all the lines of business and geography beyond motor. We'll also increasingly leverage on connected vehicle data and predictive AI beyond underwriting into customer-based management. This model -- this predictive AI model already delivered over GBP 100 million of incremental loss ratio value, and we expect this to continue over time. At the same time, we see good potential from generative AI to improve customer engagement, to increase productivity in technology and service area, and in particular, to improve speed of settlement that is great for customer and in addition, correlates with lower cost of claims. It's a win-win. Combined with further automation and continued cost discipline, we expect more than GBP 100 million of annual efficiency benefit by 2028. That as I said before, we may decide to reinvest in existing capability. On the right side of the slide, we look at our customers. We are strengthening a mobile-first digital end-to-end experience, multiproduct ownership and retention, which is already above market and will further benefit from multiproduct customers retaining around 5 points better than the rest. Lower expense ratio, higher retention and multiproduct ownership are key driver of higher customer lifetime value. As mentioned, this creates optionality, but also a more resilience to long-term market trends, margin pressures and volatility. So moving to the third pillar, amplifying Admiral DNA. This is what makes Admiral Admiral and different. It's our culture, it's our approach and it's something we are deeply proud of. As the environment evolves, we are focused on ensuring that our DNA evolves too, starting with our people through reskilling, developing internal talent and strengthening diversity and mobility across the group. We had this year so many examples of senior leader moving across different area and geography, including the new CEO of Veygo and new Head of Claims, new Group Data Officer, new Head of Data and Tech in Europe. And this internal mobility allow us to get different perspective and cross-fertilization from one side, but also continuity and cultural fit from the other. Another strong feature of Admiral culture is relentless curiosity and innovation, and we'll continue to evolve our products and innovate for our customers. We focus on offering competitive price, inclusive product, affordable product, including for nonstandard risks. Safety and sustainability are central in our product proposition, whether through fleet safety proposition like Flock or through EV electric vehicle leadership or initiatives around flood prevention. We also want to increase our positive impact on communities, investing around 1% of profit into community initiatives with focus on employability and climate resilience. We are proud of the 45,000 volunteering hours delivered by our colleague in 2025 and remain committed to our net zero ambition by 2040. So that was the third pillar of our strategy. Our strategy is also supported by a simple and disciplined capital management framework that is designed to increase value over time. So how we allocate capital to our operation? In U.K. Insurance, we focus on optimizing returns over the medium term. As we've always done, targeting consistently high return on equity with no structural capital constraints. In other lines, we invest to support growth and margin expansions where financial orders are met or expected to be met in the near term. In newer hires, like commercial, for example, we allocate capital to R&D and early-stage investment while requiring a clear right to win and scalability in the medium to long term. A key structural advantage is our capital-efficient reinsurance model and this is a competitive advantage that is quite difficult to replicate as it stands as it is built over more than 20 years of strong track record. Geraint already talked you through the other steps of our framework, including the introduction of buyback as additional way to return surplus to our shareholders. Selective M&A remains an opportunistic tool to accelerate growth, especially on Other Personal Lines in the U.K. and in Europe, only where our financial hurdles are met. So in this slide, next slide, we bring all of it together. Our strategy and capital management framework designed to deliver strong value for our customers and shareholders. We already delivered strong earnings growth, exceptional return and resilience through the cycle with a 7.6% EPS CAGR over the last 5 years. Looking forward, our ambition is to sustain and build on that performance by scaling what already works, disciplined growing U.K. Motor, faster growth and margin expansions in other lines and continued optionality from capability improvements. Our model is quite unique in the sector, delivering at the same time, strong returns, growth and exceptional capital efficiency. Importantly, this is about quality of growth as much as quantity, retaining our competitive advantage, our capital discipline and our culture that underpins them. In short, we believe we can continue to deliver higher returns sustainably while staying true to what makes Admiral different. So conclusion, to sum up, 2025 was a record year for Admiral, record profits, record dividends and strong customer growth delivered through discipline in U.K. Motor and increasingly diversified contribution across the group. Second, we have fully delivered our 2020-2025 strategy. Admiral today is resilient and more diversified with proven competitive advantage that are difficult to replicate. Third, looking ahead to 2026, while U.K. Motor market remains competitive, we expect price to increase. Admiral is well positioned to perform strongly and remain disciplined and resilient through the cycle. Fourth, we have evolved our strategy to compound those trends, not change direction, but raising ambition while staying disciplined. We have strengthened our capital management framework, adding buybacks alongside dividends while maintaining a very strong balance sheet and flexibility to invest. We remain confident on our trajectory, on our ability to leverage market trends and continue to deliver even greater value to our customers and to our shareholders for the long term. Thank you very much for listening. And now we're ready to take questions. Milena Mondini: [Operator Instructions] I think, first one, I saw it. Darius Satkauskas: Darius Satkauskas with KBW. The first question is sort of a statement and a question. I appreciate the update to the capital return policy introduction of opportunistic buyback. I think one of the challenges with having an opportunistic buyback rather than the program is that when you do it, it's great. When you don't, it sort of signals in the market that management is saying the shares may be expensive. How are you going to deal with that challenge? And are there any hurdle rates you'd like to point for us to sort of gauge how you think about when we should expect buyback and when not? And the second question is, your Flock acquisition, where do you think you are in positioning for the potential liability shift to Commercial from Personal among your competitors? And who do you think is going to determine the win in the future? Is there a risk that a company like Allianz with a huge balance sheet simply takes the entire market in Commercial Insurance? Or do you think Admiral can appropriately compete 10 years down the line, 20 years down the line? Milena Mondini: Geraint, do you want to take the first one, I'll take the second? Geraint Jones: Yes. So buybacks, it will be based on what the Board assesses is the right thing to do to try and deliver the max return for shareholders over the medium to long term. I don't, certainly for the foreseeable future, expect it to be dip in, dip out. We'd expect to be doing it for 2026, and we'll give -- we -- the company will give an update on that at least annually, I suspect, as we move forward. But yes, I hear your point on opportunistic versus steady. Milena Mondini: So your second question is about Flock and Commercial Insurance. So there are a few reasons why we're interested in this market. It's attractive as stand-alone market, but it's also a market where we see we can deploy a lot of our strength. And the fleet market is very competitive. So you do need to be a very good underwriter. Our claims and pricing strength can be transferred across nicely. But we also think it's a market that is -- it will be disrupted. And that's why we didn't want to really enter in the traditional way, but just focus on a proposition that we think is fit for the future, is the type of business that's going to grow in the future. So it's telemetry based. There's a lot of data from -- a lot of driving data, a sector in which we already have developed strong components to very large and growing telematic portfolio in Personal Lines. It's an interesting proposition because there is a strong feedback loop to driver to increase safety, to increase performance. And I would say it's also a building block for car of the future. The more the car become -- embed safety features and become autonomous, the more this type of skill set, data-driven pricing and underwriting and the feedback loop is important. So for us, it's a very interesting way to create and to develop a business that is interesting per se, but is also a way into the future. And I think it's a competitive market. We need to do it in the right way and with a proposition that is future fit. That's our ambition there. And we think the mix of Flock skill, technology and proposition, an Admiral amount of data, strength in pricing, data-driven pricing sophisticated telematic and also very strong claims management really can create something unique. Sorry, I'm going to go in order one. Ivan Bokhmat: It's Ivan Bokhmat from Barclays. My first question would be on the strategy into 2030. I just want to clarify, perhaps, did I interpret it correctly. So the slide that shows your 8% CAGR in the past 5 years, you're saying that you're trying to achieve that same growth into 2030. So as a statement, maybe you could just confirm that. And secondly, on the trajectory of those earnings, as far as I understand, for 2026, you're talking about flattish numbers and then it would imply more of a hockey stick trajectory in later years. So perhaps you could just talk a little bit about how this trajectory might look like, where the acceleration will come and maybe specifically on the U.K. Motor, that cyclical target where you would grow 5% through the cycle over time, when will that time frame apply in this particular case? And maybe one final small question. The partial internal model, the -- if you apply imminently, do you think you will get the regulatory approval by year-end? And what does it mean for some extra capital decisions? Milena Mondini: Yes. So I think what we're seeing here is 3 things. As you know, we normally don't give very precise guidance on long-term or medium-term earnings. But what we're saying is that there are 2 very clear revenue for growth and profitable growth in the future. Our core market, that is U.K. Motor, is a market where we have a market-leading business, we expect to continue to grow across the cycle. We'll continue to do at the right time and with the right choice and the discipline around pricing. But we'll continue, as we've done in every single cycle since Admiral was founded. We'll continue to grow our U.K. business from a larger base and retaining very, very strong margin. We also have another leg that is our other lines of business, Personal Lines and U.K. Insurance, Europe and Money, and we're planning to grow across all of them indistinctively and also increase margin for those business combined. So if you take those 2 things together, we expect to increase shareholders' returns over time without having necessarily put a specific date because there will still be some cyclicality. But the other preservation is with increased contribution from other lines, although there will still be market model cyclically to impact our results. We think we are gradually, over time, reducing the dependence on a single cycle. So that's the key message. Geraint Jones: Internal model? On the internal model, we do expect to submit our application for approval very soon. The time line for review of that is not fixed. And as you can imagine, it's not a short read. So I think we'd update on the outcome of that at the appropriate time rather than comment on how long we expect it to take. If and when it's approved, you can be sure we'll be trying to use it around the business to optimize and things like that. And again, we'll talk about that at the right time. Milena Mondini: Sorry, you mentioned something also about the shape. And as I was saying, there is still crack in the market. So as Geraint suggested, we do see a different path across the next few years. So we'll grow through the cycle. But next year may have a different impact on our growth ambition than the year after that. So that's -- but that's very normal. That's what we have done in the past, as you've seen in the slide that Alistair projected. We tend to grow when it's the right time when underwriting margin are healthier and will continue to do so. Sorry... Benjamin Cohen: Ben Cohen at RBC. I just wanted to ask a few things on the U.K. Motor business. Firstly, would your central assumption be that you would be able to match claims inflation through the course of '26? And could you make a comment as to what you've seen in the market reaction as you've tried to put through or you have put through some price increases at the beginning of the year? And the third element, could you just remind us what happened to claims inflation in Motor kind of post the Ukraine, Russia invasion, just to maybe give some sort of comparison with maybe where we are now in terms of the situation in the Middle East? Milena Mondini: Al, take it the first and I'll, sorry... Alistair Hargreaves: Yes, sure. So in terms of managing through the cycle in 2026, we're expecting claims inflation, as I mentioned, to be towards more normal levels, so mid-single digits. We'll be looking at that. We'll be looking at elasticity within the market. We'll be thinking about average premiums and continuing to price with discipline. As you saw in 2025, we did that and we've -- as Geraint said, we're very happy with the profitability on that yet. It's not as strong as '24, but it's still strong. So that will be the same approach that we'll take to 2026. As Milena said, reiterated, we think that's the right approach to optimizing both value and growth over the medium term. So far, in terms of market at the start of this year, we're seeing different strategies from different players. But broadly speaking, I'd say that market premiums have been relatively flat. But as I say, we've started to increase our prices at the start of the year. In terms of claims inflation post the Russia invasion, there was a lot of disruption to the supply chain and that was one of the impacts that caused higher parts, vehicle inflation as well as supply chain constraints. We don't think it's a direct parallel to what we're seeing at the moment. In terms of the disruption that we're seeing at the moment is more about oil and fuel prices not directly related. But I think as you're inferring, it increases supply chain or the geopolitical instability increases the risk of that. So that's something we'll be watching very carefully through our supply chain. William Hardcastle: Will Hardcastle, UBS. First of all, I'm going to embarrass you, Geraint. Thanks very much for your help over the years. There's been some journey in the current role. I've always really enjoyed our interactions, some of them quite lively. But you've always been really helpful. So good luck for future endeavors, including the Admiral roles. Next, on to the questions, I'll ask you the tough ones now. You booked 2025 under -- undiscounted booked loss ratio at the 78% or 85% undiscounted. That's an average number. So I'm assuming the exit was slightly worse, given the shape of the pricing last year. I guess prepricing in excess of inflation, pre-percentile shifts, how roughly, where is the starting point essentially for that '26? How much worse than the 85% should we be thinking? And then moving on to something a bit bigger picture, doubling of the non-U.K. Motor business. It's quite non-Admiral to give a target like this. I'm sort of intrigued as to the logic, the thinking behind being -- it must imply a lot of confidence behind it. Does it imply any slowdown at all of top line and sort of extraction of the benefits you put through? Or is this just a better hope and a direction of Travel from here? Alistair Hargreaves: I'll take the first one. So the first one was about the exit loss ratio. So as you pointed out, the undiscounted booked loss ratio is at 85%. It's not -- it's higher, obviously, than '24 that was an exceptional year, but it's not unusual if you look back at previous years, hence, the comments about good profitability. As I said, we managed rates through the year, paying very close eye on claims trends. And in the second half, we were flat. And I think that means that the exit loss ratio was slightly higher than the overall, but not significantly so. And as I also mentioned, as we started in '26, we made some adjustments to price to make sure that our starting point in '26 was in the right place. Milena Mondini: The second point is about confidence about the other line of business. It's a mix of 2 things. First of all, is the momentum. If you look at where we are, momentum and maturity, if you want, of some of our other lines of business, we have fantastic 2025, doubling profit in Admiral Money, strong recovery in Europe and return to profitability with confidence in the prospect and the future. And other lines of insurance in the U.K. also deliver a stellar year. I think we are reaching a maturity in those areas that allow us to continue to grow and increase margin over time. And it's also, I would say, a reflection of our strategy because the strategy is also very much about compounding. And so what I mean is that we have a few things -- we're focusing a lot on is our proposition to multi customers, very important because customers with more risk have better retention, have better loss ratio and better NPS, tend to be happier and stick longer with better results and also better experience for them. So I think there is momentum in terms of the multi -- our journey to multi-products are probably later than some other player in the market because historically, we were very much a U.K. Motor story. But as this business grow, there's a lot of potential there. That's a very interesting opportunity, but also transferring some of the strength in Predictive AI, for example, across all the business is also another big driver of value. And so if you merge those 2 things, plus economy of scale, plus potential benefit, we do see a momentum that will allow us to both continue growing and deliver more profit. And so I think it's really very much a reflection of our strategy and a bit of the switch of focus from growing individual business that are stand-alone interesting to really compound the benefit. So it's just meant to be that over time. We'll continue to be disciplined. So we follow cyclicality. There's cyclicality in the U.K. Household market that will take into account, but we do think we can achieve both growth and higher margins. Thomas Bateman: Thomas Bateman from Mediobanca. Just a quick question on the reserving. I was surprised to see the PYD quite low, but then the risk adjustment percentile come down. Could you just explain now how that's working? And the second question is actually a follow-up to Will's on -- I guess, on Europe. I take your comment of Spain is breakeven now, but I guess you have been working on that for a while and there is more confidence there. And you alluded to AI platforms, et cetera. Have you been able to launch on any of those AI platforms, either in the U.K. or in Europe yet? Milena Mondini: So do you want to take the risk adjustment? Costi maybe briefly comment on the confidence in Europe and Spain, and I will pick up maybe on the AI. Geraint Jones: Actually, Tom, if you split out the Ogden impact on last year and compare year-on-year, you get the same percentage. So a fairly strong level of releases coming through year-on-year. The percentile was really ever so slightly down. I wouldn't say that we'd notably dropped the risk adjustment strength. So it's a very strong set of reserves and continued pretty consistent releases coming through basically in line, I think, with what we've guided in that kind of 10-ish range over the past couple of years. Costantino Moretti: So on Europe and then on the AI point, so basically, yes, as Milena mentioned, there is a good level of confidence. It's a large opportunity where we are making very good progress on several fronts. And what is giving to us the confidence is that we are keep trading at very good margins on the direct business and we are seeing very good progress coming from the distribution-diversification initiatives, which will help us to target much larger opportunities. And so once also those initiatives will turn into profitable ones in the medium term, we expect our overall margins to expand. In addition to that, we expect a more efficient reinsurance agreements to provide benefit in the medium to longer term. Clearly, there is also an element about the competitiveness on the expense side on the efficiency. And we're also there making good progress, and we are testing also some more advanced gen AI tools and models. On this front, it's more early days, but early signs are very promising. Milena Mondini: I think more in general on AI, there is a lot of opportunities. And a lot of that is focused on improving efficiency internally. It's about improving automation, increasing speed of servicing the customer and so forth. I guess your question was more referred to the distribution element. So how customers interact and choose insurance. And if you think about Admiral from very early stage, we've always been a bit of a forefront of disruption and distribution, and we were among the first direct player in the market in the U.K. We were the first to have an Internet-only brand, Elephant, let's call it in U.K. We're the first one to embed price comparison site with confused.com and so forth. So it's obviously something that, as you may imagine, we're very close -- we're working very close to price comparison site as they may embed more gen AI technology in their way of interacting to customer and distribution and adapting our website. We also have interesting pilot in part of the business, like gen AI embed chatbot in Veygo and other initiative across the group. So something we're very, very close. Now if you ask me, do you think this is going to be a very big disruption in U.K. Motor in the short term? I personally don't think is the case. I think there will be a different way of interacting with the customer. But the value proposition to a customer, how much you can save by shopping on price comparison site on Motor insurance is huge. It's hundreds of pounds sometimes. So I don't think it's going to be the first market where we see a lot of change. I think it's early to say. Everything is very nascent at this stage, but I think there are markets where this could be an acceleration to direct and that could be the one where customers are more used to speak with an intermediary, for example. So it can be commercial lines, it can be Europe where direct is not picked. But at this stage, it's very early to say. As for us, we try to be close to everything and work and progress on all the fronts at the same time. I think we had 1, 2 and 3, yes. Carl Lofthagen: Carl Lofthagen from Berenberg. Just the first one on the U.K. Home book. I think we've seen kind of continued expense ratio improvement as you've gained scale and you're now running the business at a combined ratio in sort of the mid-80s. Is that sort of the level that you're sort of happy with? Or are you willing to trade some margin to take market share as you've kind of said you want to be a top 3 player? And then the second question is just a clarification on the share count development. I think if I just look at the basic share count, which decreased by GBP 5 million from GBP 306 million to GBP 301 million in H2, but diluted went up GBP 1 million. Presumably, the shares you're buying back for the share scheme shouldn't impact the share count. Just I guess for modeling purposes, I mean, how should we kind of think about that, excluding sort of any sort of additional buybacks, et cetera? Milena Mondini: Sorry, Al, you take the first. Geraint will take the second. Alistair Hargreaves: So on the Household expense ratio, we've had an advantage in terms of expense ratio for Household for some time. But as you highlight, it's an area of focus. As the book grows and we get more renewals to customers, that helps in terms of expense ratio, but we're also focused on driving improvements. For example, Milena talked about how we can use gen AI for both customer experience and efficiency. So those are areas of focus. In terms of the combined ratio range, we think about Household similar to Motor, where it's about optimizing for value over the medium term. But as you're alluding to, we're a bit more biased towards growth on Household than margin. But we -- I think the 80% is good. I think we talked a bit about a range when we did the deep dive, so we're not sort of sticking to a specific target. But we'll do that in optimizing for value and growth over the medium term. Geraint Jones: On share count, Carl, if you look at the -- in the back of our accounts on Note 12, you got the update the number of shares that were in issue every year. It's been GBP 306 million odd for a couple of years since we stopped diluting for the share plans. The GBP 301 million is actually the number that's used in the EPS, and that excludes some of those shares that are held in the trust. The share purchases per share plans won't adjust the number of shares that were an issue, obviously. They will go to employees. The share buyback and cancel, obviously, that will reduce the number of shares in issue. So the purchase for the share plans doesn't change the number of shares. Buybacks obviously will. Derald Goh: It's Derald Goh from Jefferies. Two big picture questions, if I may, please. So the 4% sort of EV -- sorry, AV penetration rate by 2035, that's an interesting number. I'm just keen to hear what are the main variables that might sway that number. Essentially how prudent is that 4%? And maybe if you could also say what were your projections 10 years ago? How does that compare to what you had 10 years ago, let's say? And then secondly, going back to distribution, you mentioned there's potential to disrupt there. Maybe could you speak to your past experiences? I know you've been trying to push PCWs outside the U.K. Some places are more successful than others. What might be different this time that would allow you to be more successful with whether it's AI or changes in customer behaviors and what not? Milena Mondini: Sure. I think I'll take the first and second, but Costi, if you want to add anything on distribution outside U.K., it would be great. So EV, this is referred to this is referred to relatively common forecasts that have been out like the World Economic Forum and a lot of other organization. And I think the number is quite aligned. You may look at car sales in terms of car park is 4% because there is quite a lag time from new sales to fit into car park. The average -- the median age of a car in U.K. is 16 and probably the average is 11 years. So it takes time as the new model gets released. I think you're absolutely right. So it's still very much of an estimate, and there are a lot of influencing factors. You need to get, first of all, regulation in place, infrastructure in place, technology and investment in place and customer appetite in place. So there are a lot of things that can contribute and can go both direction. If we don't see the simultaneous development of all these 4 areas, it's difficult to imagine a world in which people will really freely just use autonomous vehicles car on the roads. So I cannot tell if it's prudent or not. But I would say this is really the majority of the -- I think everybody agrees that it takes some time, both because there are some hurdles and because there is time for the car park to evolve. And I think also take the chance to remind that this is about L3+. L3 basically means when the driver can take the highs off of the wheel, but still need to get in, in 10 seconds. So it's not really full benefit of EV in terms of, for example, liability shift and so forth. Anyway, it's very nascent now. So you asked me how this was versus 10 years ago? I think this is a story that we see in all the technology disruption. If I go back 10 years, this was supposed to be earlier. And so what happened is that this projection tend to shift. If you ask me how it was compared to a few years back, like maybe 3, 4? What I would say is not very different, but we see a slightly later adoption, but probably faster. It very often happen with every technology now that it takes longer, longer, longer, but then it can be more. So it's difficult to say, honestly. It's very, very early stage, and the U.K. is a bit behind the U.S. in terms of regulation and so forth. Second question was on distribution. I don't know, Costi, do you want to kick it off on? Costantino Moretti: Yes. On distribution, the -- well, the European markets, as you know, are very different. When we started our businesses a few years ago, I think direct was about 5%. Now on average, it's getting closer to 20% -- between 15% and 20%, so direct is still growing. And therefore, if a more AI-driven disruption would happen, we could say that being a leading player in those markets that will put us in a nice place. At the same time, price comparisons, you're right. We try to educate the market and to push more digital growth to accelerate. It didn't happen at the speed we expected. And at the moment, as I said, direct is still growing, price comparisons are doing nicely, but not at a supe- fast speed. At the same time, traditional are still a very important channel, which predominantly is the main channel, which is linked why we decided a while ago to start to diversify the distribution and on how to win and how we can be confident basically because the right to wins are exactly the same of direct. So risk selection, customer experience and lean operations. And the moment you demonstrate that you can replicate those, then you can win in that market and our results that are coming through are making us confident more and more that we can achieve this. Andreas de Groot van Embden: Andreas van Embden, Peel Hunt. Two questions, please. First one is on ancillary sales. I saw that the average sort of revenue per vehicle in the U.K. has come down from GBP 76 to GBP 71. Just wondered what your outlook is for this in '26 and '27, particularly not only on the installment income because I assume you've lowered your APRs, which has brought down the average premium per policy there or per vehicle there. But also on the other ancillary sales, whether you're seeing any pressure on those fees and commissions? And on -- the second question is on price velocity. I think you mentioned that. I just wondered what would you exactly meant by that in the U.K. and whether extending it means changing pricing more. I don't know whether you do intraday pricing or not in the U.K. But whether -- with that velocity, by how much could you extend it? And how important is that to maintain your competitive position, particularly through PCWs in the U.K. as the market becomes more competitive? Alistair Hargreaves: So it's Al. I'll take the first one. As you mentioned, the main driver of the change in the revenue is premium finance. It's worth noting that there's 2 impacts there. So we did reduce our APR through 2025, in line with the cost of funds. But also, we saw our average premiums coming down through the year. So that also impacts on the other revenue per vehicle. So in terms of our APRs, they're very competitive at the moment, not necessarily anticipating any changes, but we'll continue to assess for fair value on that product. In terms of average premiums, as we've said, we're expecting the market to turn and that will lead to -- and we're increasing our premium, so that will flow through as well. I don't think there's anything else of significant note to call out on other revenue. Milena Mondini: So on the price velocity, I think if we step back just a few years back, a lot of the pricing was done through SaaS or XL, and we could put price change in production overnight, we can have a meeting. If you all ask me, I'll let Geraint decide and make change almost overnight. That is still the case. And I think it's an advantage. And I think it's really rooted in the culture and the closeness of the management team to price into claims trend and that relevance that we give to loss ratio all around Admiral. But our pricing is more and more based on machine learning and predictive AI models. And this, of course, is not something that you change overnight because it's more complex, require more technology, the process to upgrade and renew the model just takes longer. And we've done a fantastic -- like a lot of work in the last year or 2 to really bring this time from ideation to change in production much shorter and shorter. I think there is still a bit we can go for. And so we're very close and we have a strong capability, more than 120 models in place, GBP 100 million of loss ratio incremental value. So we start from a good point. But I think there is more we can go to increase this even more. But the biggest opportunity in my mind is to extend this also more and to extend these trends more into other lines of business. So that's where I see the excitement. And to do that, we appointed this year a new group CDO. She did a great job in Europe to set up a new data platform. She just -- she's coming over and she came over actually a couple of months ago, and she's going to help to increase even more this ability. So I think we're really in a very strong position, but want to go. We're very keen to be as fast as we can. Operator: [Operator Instructions] We will now go to the question. And the question comes from the line of Vash Gosalia from Goldman Sachs. Vash Gosalia: Hopefully you can hear me. First of all, apologies for not being there in person. I have 2 questions, please. The first one is just on something you mentioned on your 2026 profitability. So if I heard you correctly, you said you plan to move to the middle of your confidence interval through 2026. And you've obviously also said you expect flattish profitability. So can I read that as your earnings in 2026 actually being supported by PYD just to offset some of the weakness in U.K. Motor? And any sort of color as to how or why that might be different would be really helpful. And the second question, a slightly longer term or big picture question. So you've obviously sort of alluded to you having a lot of sort of advantage on the cost ratio front. And you can obviously leverage AI and gen AI to improve that. But I'm just trying to think if the technology essentially democratizes the use of AI, wouldn't that allow your competitors to actually gain advantage quicker and narrow the gap to you? So any sort of color or comment on that would be helpful as well. Milena Mondini: Will you take the first? Geraint Jones: Yes. So we would expect to start to release our -- reduce our risk adjustment percentile from its current near max level towards the middle of the range during 2026. I would reject your assertion of weak U.K. Motor. I think U.K. Motor profitability for '25 is strong, but slightly less strong than the extremely strong 2024. So we think there's good profitability to come on 2025. And obviously, that starts to feed into the accounts in 2026. PYD and reserve releases are a constant feature of our income statement and profitability. But you are right to expect as we reduce the risk adjustment to some extent, obviously, that contributes to profitability in 2026 versus 2025. And if you do the mix, flat profitability, but higher profits from other lines of business means slightly lower profits from U.K. Motor, but from a very high start point. So I think -- Vash, I think that was the nature of the question, right? Vash Gosalia: Yes. I mean -- and apologies if I said like weak profitability. I meant more direction-wise. But yes, you've answered my question. Geraint Jones: No offense taken. Milena Mondini: On the second point, it's a very good question. It's a very good question. I think every technological evolution, data evolution and if you think about digitalization, automation, migration to cloud, more and more like technology, it becomes more and more a commodity itself, but the way technology is implemented is very differentiating and it becomes more so as we move along. And so a big decision on AI is how you do it. A big driver are how much this is adopted. So you can deploy gen AI tool to have all the organization, but how much is adopted, how is adopted is a massive driver of how much efficiency benefit you can drive. I think we start in a great situation because we tend to have a very strong culture, very transparent and people with good expertise that are really, really keen to do what is right for the business. Governance is another differentiating factor, how you govern what you put in place and how you make sure that it's solid, is stable, how make sure that the model learn over time. I think an appetite for innovation, bottom up as well as top-down is also very important. So I think a lot of the element that plays here are a culture and also the ability to do it faster, better and cheaper than others. And it's still early to say, but I think we are well positioned to achieve that. We have a last question. Shanti Kang: It's Shanti from Bank of America. You just touched a bit earlier when we talked about the internal model and how that could give you a bit of flexion for M&A. Historically, I guess, you guys have partnered with names via Pioneer or you've had a relationship with the existing names before you would kind of move forward with an M&A transaction. What kind of skill sets or regions, if you were looking at that, would you be thinking of? Milena Mondini: It's the last question. Do you want to take it? Geraint Jones: It sounds like I've explained this badly. I wasn't really referring to the internal model coming in, giving us more firepower for M&A necessarily. I understand the point of the question, but I think funding small M&A to retain profitability is one of the options I would talk about. I know you should cover where M&A might play a part of it. Milena Mondini: Yes. So as I said, our plan -- our history of successful organic growth, and we're excited about the plan we have on growing organically. We will look into opportunity mainly to accelerate diversification, I would say. So as we've done with Flock as we've done with More Than, we'll look at accelerated diversification in other lines of business in insurance in the U.K. or in Europe where we need more scale. But we stay open, look and see, but also very, very focused on our organic growth plan and consider different option on how to eventually tackle the challenge. Thank you very much. Thank you for your question, and thank you for your time. And we'll be around a few minutes if that can help. Thanks a lot.
Bullish sentiment decreased 0.1 percentage points to 33.1%. Neutral sentiment increased 4.4 percentage points to 31.4%.
Historical analysis shows energy inflation from geopolitical events is typically transitory and only marginally impacts overall inflation. According to my analysis, the impact of a conflict has always had only a marginal effect on stock prices.
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, discussed the upcoming February employment report, expected to show around 50,000 job additions. He speaks on "Bloomberg The Close.
The man who led Goldman Sachs through the 2008 financial crisis is sounding the alarm on private credit, joining a chorus of Wall Street veterans expressing concern at a pivotal time for the industry.
Veteran investor Howard Marks said he doesn't see a widespread problem brewing in private credit, but warned that the sector's rapid expansion over the past 15 years could expose weaker lenders when markets eventually turn.
The duration and the cost of the war are key factors for the U.S. federal budget.
The Investment Committee debate how to play the volatile markets and whether investors should buy the dip or not.
Stock declines for Nvidia and AMD came as Bloomberg reported the U.S. drafted regulations restricting AI chip shipments without U.S. approval, requiring companies to seek permission for nearly all exports of AI tech. Neither the White House, AMD, nor Nvidia immediately responded to requests for comment.
The outperformance of international stocks is faltering as oil prices climb to $80 barrel.
President Donald Trump is facing a major legal challenge from a group of states that are planning to file a lawsuit over his order placing a 10% tax on goods entering the US after the Supreme Court struck down his earlier sweeping duties last month. Greg Stohr reports on Bloomberg Television.
“This piece is absolutely embarrassing for young Wall Street and embarrassing for the firms they work for.” - Sozzi Yahoo Finance's panel weighs in on gives their thoughts on the recent profile of four young Wall Street bankers in Interview magazine.
How has the ETF handled the moment it was seemingly designed for? So far, the results are “meh.
Worries about global conflicts are overshadowing the AI enthusiasm that once dominated the market.